Peibei Cao1,2, Linfang Xiao1,2, Yilong Liu1,2, Yujiao Zhao1,2, Yanqiu Feng3, Alex T Leong1,2, and Ed X Wu1,2
1Laboratory of Biomedical Imaging and Signal Processing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China, 2Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China, 3School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
Synopsis
Convolutional
neural network (CNN) has emerged as a powerful tool for medical image
reconstruction. In this study, we designed and implemented a CNN model for partial
Fourier MRI reconstruction, and compared its performance with the existing projection
onto convex sets (POCS) method. The
results demonstrated that our proposed deep learning approach could
effectively recovered the high frequency components and outperformed the POCS
method especially when partial Fourier fraction is close to 50%.
Introduction
Despite
the excellent spatial resolution and soft tissue contrast, clinical MRI suffers
from the intrinsic limitation of generally long scan time. In practice, partial
Fourier data acquisition is often performed along phase encoding direction and
frequency encoding direction to accelerate scan and shorten echo time,
respectively. Subsequently missing k-space data are often estimated using the projection
onto convex sets (POCS) method1, yet its performance is suboptimal in presence
of rapid image phase variations especially when partial Fourier fraction is low.
Recently, deep learning algorithms including deep convolutional neural networks
(CNNs) are entering the field of MRI reconstruction and demonstrate great
potential in parallel imaging reconstruction, noise and artifact suppression2-5.
In this study, we aimed to develop a deep learning approach for robust partial
Fourier reconstruction. We designed a CNN model and trained it using large human
knee datasets. The results demonstrated that our method was robust and
outperformed the existing POCS method.Method
CNN Model
The
CNN model is illustrated in Figure 1.
It has five convolutional layers and each layer is followed by the batch
normalization layer and the activation function – Rectified Linear Unit (ReLU),
due to its nonlinear characteristics. The real and imaginary parts of the
original images act as two channels of the input for the network. Similarly,
the two channels of the output are the real and imaginary parts of the predicted
residual. The training and testing processes were implemented using PyTorch 1.0
on a Linux workstation (Intel Xeon(R) E5-1620 v4 CPU, 64GB RAM and two NVIDIA
GTX 1080ti GPUs).
Data preparation, CNN
training and testing
For
model training, validation and testing, we employed the large and original knee
datasets from the Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R)
at NYU School of Medicine and NYU Langone Health6. They were complex single-channel coronal
proton density-weighted knee image datasets obtained from 1500 normal subjects
on 3T and 1.5T clinical MRI scanners. For each subject dataset, images from 20 consecutive
slice locations were extracted. The complex images were then resized to 256×256.
The resulting 30,000 images (1500×20) were divided into
three groups, i.e., 70% for training, 15% for validation, and 15% for testing,
respectively. The performance of our CNN model and existing POCS method were
compared for different partial Fourier fractions that varied from 0.65 to 0.51 along
the frequency encoding or phase encoding direction.
For frequency encoding partial Fourier, we examined the partial Fourier
fractions of 0.65, 0.55 and 0.51. For phase encoding partial Fourier, we examined the
partial Fourier fractions of 0.6 and 0.55.
To further evaluate the robustness of the CNN model trained with the
complex human knee proton-density-weighted images as described above, we
applied and evaluated its performance in partial Fourier reconstruction of the brain
T1-weighted gradient-echo (GE) and T2-weighted fast spin echo (FSE) image
datasets acquired on a separate 3T Philips MRI scanner.Results
Figure 2 shows the typical reconstruction
results by the proposed CNN method and existing POCS methods for partial
Fourier faction of 0.55 along the frequency encoding direction (vertical). Figure 3 compares the performance of
POCS and CNN methods at partial Fourier fractions of 0.65, 0.55 and 0.51
(nearly half-Fourier) along frequency encoding direction (vertical), together
with the residual image root mean square error (RMSE) analysis of POCS and CNN
results from all 800 test image datasets. Figure
4 compares the performance of the two methods at partial Fourier fractions
of 0.6 and 0.55 along the phase encoding direction (horizontal). These results
clearly demonstrated that the proposed CNN method performed better than the POCS
method, especially in preserving high frequency image information without
amplifying noise. Figure 5 shows the
partial Fourier reconstruction of brain images using the knee-image-trained CNN
model at partial Fourier fraction of 0.55 along the vertical phase encoding
direction (Figure 5A) and along the horizontal frequency encoding direction (Figure
5B), again demonstrating the superior and robust performance of the proposed
CNN method over POCS.Discussion and conclusions
This
study demonstrated a new deep learning approach for the partial Fourier MRI
reconstruction using convolutional neural networks. The proposed CNN model is
based on the complex image residual map prediction from the complex image
directly reconstructed by zero-padding the missing k-space data. The
experimental results indicated that this CNN approach robustly reconstructed
partial Fourier k-space data by recovering high frequency image
information/structures without noise amplification even when partial Fourier
fraction approached 0.5 (i.e., half-Fourier), significantly outperforming the
traditional POCS method. Further, knee-image-trained CNN model were also
successfully demonstrated to be applicable to partial Fourier reconstruction of
other organ images with different contrasts (i.e., brain T2-weighted FSE images
as well as the T1-weighted GE images where rapid local phase variations often
occur). Future studies will focus on the optimization and evaluation of various
CNN models for reconstruction accuracy and robustness.Acknowledgements
This study is supported in part by
Hong Kong Research Grant Council (C7048-16G and HKU17115116 to E.X.W.),
Guangdong Key Technologies for Treatment of Brain Disorders (2018B030332001)
and Guangdong Key Technologies for Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
(2018B030336001) to E.X.W.References
1. Haacke E.M, Lindskogj E.D, Lin W. A fast, iterative,
partial-fourier technique capable of local phase recovery. Journal of Magnetic Resonance 92,
126-145 (1991).
2. Mardani
M, Gong E, Cheng JY, Vasanawala SS, Zaharchuk G, Xing L, Pauly JM. Deep
generative adversarial neural networks for compressive sensing MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 38, 167–179 (2019).
3. Quan TM,
Nguyen‐Duc T, Jeong W‐K. Compressed sensing MRI reconstruction
using a generative adversarial network with a cyclic loss. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 37,
1488–1497 (2018).
4. Qin C, Schlemper J, Caballero J, Price AN, Hajnal JV, Rueckert D.
Convolutional recurrent neural networks for dynamic MR image reconstruction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 38, 280–290 (2019).
5. Zhang
QQ, Ruan GR, Yang W, et al. MRI Gibbs-ringing
artifact reduction by means of machine learning using convolutional neural
networks. Magnetic Resonace in Medicine 82, 1-13 (2019).
6. from the Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and
Research (CAI2R) at NYU School of Medicine and NYU Langone Health.
https://fastmri.med.nyu.edu/