Jeehun Kim1,2, Chaoyi Zhang3, Mingrui Yang1,2, Hongyu Li3, Mei Li1,2, Richard Lartey1,2, Leslie Ying3,4, and Xiaojuan Li1,2,5
1Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States, 2Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States, 3Electrical Engineering, University at Buffalo, the State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, United States, 4Biomedical Engineering, University at Buffalo, the State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, United States, 5Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States
Synopsis
Quantitative T1ρ MRI provides valuable information on
compositional changes in cartilage, but requires longer scan time compared to
conventional imaging. In this work, kernel-based low-rank compressed sensing
reconstruction was used to accelerate T1ρ imaging and the retrospective and
prospective undersampled results from four subjects were compared to reference T1ρ
values.
Purpose
Quantitative MRI provides valuable information on
compositional changes in soft tissues. Among the techniques, numerous studies
have suggested that T1ρ imaging could be used to detect early cartilage
degeneration in osteoarthritis.(1, 2)
However, the long scan time of T1ρ due to the necessity of acquiring multiple
images remains as a challenge for clinical application. Accelerated T1ρ imaging
combining parallel imaging and compressed sensing have shown promising results.(3, 4)
However, previous studies primarily applied retrospective downsampling and no
studies yet have reported results from prospective downsampling. In this work, we
applied a novel Kernel-based low-rank (KLR) compressed sensing reconstruction
and demonstrated the feasibility of accelerated T1ρ imaging with retrospective
and prospective downsampling in the knee.Methods
In the quantitative T1ρ technique, the exponential decay model represents the underlying relationship between echo images. However, additional factors in
actual data acquisition such as noise and motion effect further complicate this
relationship. To solve this, we used the kernel-based low-rank (KLR) method to
reconstruct the images. Specifically, temporal bases were learned from low-resolution images obtained from a fully sampled center k-space of
each echo. These temporal bases can represent not only the exponential model but
also the noise and motion effects. Then an optimization problem was formulated by
adding temporal bases as constraint along with a data fidelity term, which can be solved by an iterative algorithm. The
details of the KLR method can be found in (5).
Four volunteers were
studied using a 3T MR scanner (Magnetom Prisma, Siemens Healthcare AG,
Erlangen, Germany) with a 1Tx/15Rx knee coil
(QED). The imaging protocol included 3D magnetization-prepared angle-modulated
partitioned k-space spoiled gradient-echo snapshots (MAPSS) T1ρ imaging (6, 7) and dual-echo steady-state (DESS) imaging sequences. For retrospective undersampling, two healthy
volunteers were scanned with parallel imaging (GRAPPA) factor of 2, and
reconstructed K-space data was used to simulate retrospective undersampling.
Undersampling factors (denoted as RF) of 4, 6, and 8 were simulated. For
prospective undersampling, the mask generated during retrospective
undersampling simulation was implemented to the sequence program. Two healthy
subjects were scanned with the implemented sequence with RF of 4, 6, and 8,
respectively. For both retrospective and prospective cases, imaging with 2x GRAPPA was used as reference image. Detailed sequence parameters are listed
at Table 1. For KLR compressed
sensing reconstruction, the number of principal components was set to 6, and the soft
threshold value of 10 was used.
For T1ρ quantification, a two-parameter mono-exponential
fitting was performed. Automatic segmentation was performed on the first echo
of T1ρ image to segment six compartments (medial/lateral femur [MFC/LFC],
medial/lateral tibia [MT/LT], trochlea [TRO], and patellar [PAT]). For
prospective undersampling, a deep learning automatic segmentation was used on
the DESS image to segment four compartments (Femur [FC], medial/lateral tibia
[MT/LT], and patellar [PAT]). The coefficient of variations (CVs) were
calculated between the reference and different undersampled results.Results
Table 2 summarized the
quantitative results for the T1ρ map generated from the compressed-sensing
reconstruction of both retrospectively and prospectively undersampled acquisition.
For retrospective undersampling, the average CVs with respect to the reference
value increased with higher RFs, but the overall average was lower than 3% (Table 3). With prospective
undersampling, the overall CV increased compared to the retrospectively
undersampled reconstruction, but the average CVs stayed under 5%. Figure 1 shows two slices of T1ρ
maps from prospective undersampling.Discussion
With our novel compressed sensing reconstruction, 8 echoes of T1ρ weighted images could
be collected within 4 minutes to generate a T1ρ map within 5% CV of the reference T1ρ
map. The CVs were comparable to the scan-rescan repeatability of in vivo T1ρ
imaging reported in the literature.(2) 3D MAPSS T1ρ imaging with
RF cycling and variable flip angles has been validated to provide more accurate
and reliable T1ρ quantification by minimizing the filter effect in k-space and
T1 recovery contamination (6, 7). However, RF cycling
requires a double scan time. The proposed acceleration method in the study
will significantly reduce the acquisition time while keeping the quantification
accuracy. In this study, the reconstruction based on the KLR algorithm showed
promising results. No spatial regularization was applied within each echo
images. We will investigate if combining spatial regularization and KLR will
further improve quantification accuracy. There also remains a question
regarding the discrepancy between retrospective simulation and actual
prospectively undersampled outcome, which can be contributed by the different
order of k-space data acquisition and different noise distribution between the
simulation and actual acquisition. Different schemes of acquisition ordering
will be implemented and evaluated in the future.Conclusion
In this study, we have
demonstrated the feasibility of highly accelerated T1ρ imaging with high
quantification accuracy by using prospective downsampling and novel compressed
sensing reconstruction. To confirm the results warrants large scale studies. Such novel acceleration techniques will significantly facilitate the rapid
clinical translation of quantitative MRI techniques.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Atkinson HF, Birmingham TB, Moyer
RF, Yacoub D, Kanko LE, Bryant DM, et al. MRI T2 and T1rho relaxation in
patients at risk for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. BMC musculoskeletal disorders. 2019;20(1):182
2. MacKay JW, Low SBL, Smith TO, Toms
AP, McCaskie AW, Gilbert FJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the
reliability and discriminative validity of cartilage compositional MRI in knee
osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and cartilage. 2018;26(9):1140-52
3. Zhou Y, Pandit P, Pedoia V, Rivoire
J, Wang Y, Liang D, et al. Accelerating T1rho cartilage imaging using
compressed sensing with iterative locally adapted support detection and JSENSE.
Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2016;75(4):1617-29.
4. Zibetti MVW, Sharafi A, Otazo R,
Regatte RR. Accelerating 3D-T1rho mapping of cartilage using compressed sensing
with different sparse and low rank models. Magnetic resonance in medicine.
2018;80(4):1475-91.
5. Nakarmi U, Wang Y, Lyu J, Liang D,
Ying L. A Kernel-Based Low-Rank (KLR) Model for Low-Dimensional Manifold
Recovery in Highly Accelerated Dynamic MRI. IEEE transactions on medical
imaging. 2017;36(11):2297-307
6. Li X, Han ET, Busse RF, Majumdar S.
In vivo T(1rho) mapping in cartilage using 3D magnetization-prepared
angle-modulated partitioned k-space spoiled gradient echo snapshots (3D MAPSS).
Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2008;59(2):298-307.
7. Li
X, Pedoia V, Kumar D, Rivoire J, Wyatt C, Lansdown D, et al. Cartilage T1rho
and T2 relaxation times: longitudinal reproducibility and variations using
different coils, MR systems and sites. Osteoarthritis and cartilage.
2015;23(12):2214-23.