Daeun Kim1, Jonathan Polimeni2, Kawin Setsompop2, and Justin Haldar1
1Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 2Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States
Synopsis
Noise
correlations exist in multi-channel k-space data, and methods to optimally
account for this correlation have been used for a long time in image-domain
parallel imaging methods like SENSE. However,
methods to address noise are not widely-utilized for Fourier-domain parallel
imaging methods like GRAPPA, SPIRiT, and AC-LORAKS. In this work, we demonstrate that properly
accounting for spatially-varying noise correlation can substantially reduce the
noise level of coil-combined images.
Further, we demonstrate the existence of previously-unknown correlations
between the real and imaginary parts of the noise in reconstructed images. Accounting for this extra correlation can
reduce the noise level even further.
Introduction
In multichannel MRI, the thermal noise samples from different receiver
elements are often correlated with one another1. Methods that properly account for such noise
correlation can be important to maximize image SNR. Techniques that address noise correlation are
widely used by coil combination methods designed for fully-sampled data1
and accelerated image-domain parallel imaging methods like SENSE2,3.
While there are also many popular linear Fourier-domain multichannel
reconstruction methods (e.g., GRAPPA4, coil-by-coil SMASH5,
SPIRiT6, PRUNO7, AC-LORAKS8, etc.), the post-reconstruction
coil combination approaches that are used with these methods usually do not consider
noise correlation. We are only aware of
one previous attempt to address correlation issues for GRAPPA9,
where it was demonstrated that accounting for the spatially-varying noise
covariance of the reconstructed images could yield moderate improvements in
SNR. In this work, we generalize this
idea to the broader class of linear Fourier-domain reconstruction methods. In addition, we make the novel observation
that the multichannel reconstructions obtained from linear Fourier-domain
multichannel reconstruction methods often exhibit non-trivial crosscorrelations
between the real and imaginary parts of the noise. Based on this observation, we propose an optimal
improved approach that leads to even further improvements.Theory
Consider a scenario in which a vector $$$\mathbf{d}$$$ of undersampled
noisy multichannel k-space data is measured.
For simplicity, assume that this data has been pre-whitened3
so that it does not exhibit any noise correlations prior to applying a
reconstruction procedure. Subsequently,
a linear Fourier-domain reconstruction procedure (e.g., GRAPPA) is applied to
this data to yield fully-sampled estimated k-space datasets for each channel,
which are collected into the vector $$$\mathbf{k}$$$. Regardless of which reconstruction technique
was used, linearity implies that we can write $$$\mathbf{k} = \mathbf{A}\mathbf{d}$$$
for some matrix $$$\mathbf{A}$$$.
Finally, it is common to perform linear Fourier reconstruction of these
estimated k-space datasets, which we denote by
$$$\mathbf{f}=\mathbf{F}^{-1}\mathbf{k}$$$, where $$$\mathbf{f}$$$ is the vector of
reconstructed multichannel images, and $$$\mathbf{F}^{-1}$$$ denotes the inverse
Fourier transform operation. The final
step in most image reconstruction pipelines is then to combine the images from
multiple channels together.
Even though we assumed that $$$\mathbf{d}$$$ was prewhitened, it is
straightforward to show that the noise in the reconstructed multichannel images
$$$\mathbf{f}$$$ is no longer white, and has a spatially-varying noise covariance
matrix $$$\boldsymbol{\Psi}$$$ given by $$$\boldsymbol{\Psi}=\mathbf{F}^{-1}\mathbf{A}\mathbf{A}^H\mathbf{F}^{-H}$$$. While this covariance matrix is generally
very large and intractable to work with, it is straightforward to estimate its
components using existing Monte Carlo simulation methods10.
To achieve optimal SNR, it is important to perform the final coil
combination step while accounting for the spatially-varying covariance
structure. When using a coil-combination
approach that relies on sensitivity maps, then the standard "SNR-optimal” coil
combination approach for a voxel $$$n$$$ with voxel-specific sensitivity map
matrix $$$\mathbf{S}_n$$$ and voxel-specific noise covariance matrix
$$$\boldsymbol{\Psi}_n$$$ is given by1-3 $$$(\mathbf{S}_n^H\boldsymbol{\Psi}_n^{-1}\mathbf{S}_n)^{-1}
\mathbf{S}_n^H\boldsymbol{\Psi}_n^{-1}\mathbf{f}_n,$$$ where $$$\mathbf{f}_n$$$
is the vector of multichannel image data for the $$$n$$$th voxel.
Importantly, the above procedure is only optimal if there is no correlation
between the real and imaginary parts of the reconstructed image noise. However, in this work, we make the novel
observation that there frequently does exist correlation between the real and
imaginary parts of the noise for the Fourier-domain image reconstruction
methods we consider. This correlation is
illustrated in Fig. 1.
To optimally account for this real-imaginary correlation structure, the
previous coil-combination strategy should be replaced by
$$\left[\begin{array}{cc}1\\i\end{array}\right]^T(\tilde{\mathbf{S}}_n^H\tilde{\boldsymbol{\Psi}}_n^{-1}\mathbf{S}_n)^{-1}\tilde{\mathbf{S}}_n^H
\tilde{\boldsymbol{\Psi}}_n^{-1}\tilde{\mathbf{f}}_n,$$
where $$\tilde{\mathbf{S}}_n=\left[\begin{array}{cc}\mathrm{real}(\mathbf{S}_n)&-\mathrm{imag}(\mathbf{S}_n)\\\mathrm{imag}(\mathbf{S}_n)&\mathrm{real}(\mathbf{S}_n)\end{array}\right],$$ $$\tilde{\mathbf{f}}_n=\left[\begin{array}{c}\mathrm{real}(\mathbf{f}_n)
\\\mathrm{imag}(\mathbf{f}_n) \end{array}\right],$$ and
$$$\tilde{\boldsymbol{\Psi}}$$$ is the covariance matrix corresponding to
separated real and imaginary components.Methods
The proposed approach was investigated using real 32-channel phantom
data. ACS data was obtained from a
prescan, and sensitivity maps were also obtained using ESPIRiT11. Image reconstruction was performed using
three different linear Fourier-domain methods (GRAPPA4, C-based AC-LORAKS8,
and S-based AC-LORAKS8) for three different parallel imaging
acceleration factors (R=2,3, and 4 with uniform undersampling). To assess SNR-optimality, theoretical noise
standard deviation maps were obtained using Monte Carlo simulations10. We considered three different coil
combination approaches: (1) the standard approach that ignores the
spatially-varying noise correlations (i.e., assuming $$$\boldsymbol{\Psi}_n$$$ is
the identity matrix for all voxels); (2) the "conventional whitening" approach9
that accounts for spatially-varying correlations but does not account for
real-imaginary correlations; and (3) our proposed new whitening approach that
accounts for both spatially-varying correlations and the correlations between
the real and imaginary parts of the noise.Results
Results for the three different reconstruction methods are shown in Figs.
2-4. Results demonstrate that the
improvements in the noise standard deviation can be substantial when using the
conventional whitening procedure (~60% in some cases), and that our proposed
new real-imaginary whitening procedure can lead to further additional
improvements (~20% additional improvement beyond conventional whitening). However, the actual improvement levels that
are achieved levels can vary substantially depending on the reconstruction
method and the acceleration factor.Conclusion
Based on a novel observation about the structure of
covariance matrices, we proposed and evaluated a novel method that can be used
for optimal-SNR coil combination of the reconstructed multichannel images
obtained from arbitrary linear Fourier-domain reconstruction methods. We observe that accounting for
spatially-varying noise correlation can reduce noise substantially, while accounting
for real-imaginary cross-correlations can reduce noise even further. Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by research grants
NSF CCF-1350563, NIH R01-MH116173, NIH R01-NS074980, and NIH R01-NS089212.
References
1. Roemer PB, Edelstein WA, Hayes CE, Souza SP, Mueller OM. The NMR phased array. Magn Reson Med 1990; 16(2):192-225.
2. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42(5):952-62.
3. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Börnert P, Boesiger P. Advances in sensitivity encoding with arbitrary k‐space trajectories. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: An Official Journal of the International Society for Magn Reson Med 2001;46(4):638-51.
4. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, Nittka M, Jellus V, Wang J, Kiefer B, Haase A. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med 2002;47(6):1202-10.
5. McKenzie CA, Ohliger MA, Yeh EN, Price MD, Sodickson DK. Coil‐by‐coil image reconstruction with SMASH. Magn Reson Med 2001;46(3):619-23.
6. Lustig M, Pauly JM. SPIRiT: iterative self‐consistent parallel imaging reconstruction from arbitrary k‐space. Magn Reson Med 2010;64(2):457-71.
7. Zhang J, Liu C, Moseley ME. Parallel reconstruction using null operations. Magn Reson Med 2011;66(5):1241-53.
8. Haldar JP. Autocalibrated LORAKS for fast constrained MRI reconstruction. Proc IEEE ISBI 2015;910-13.
9. Polimeni JR, Setsompop K, Triantafyllou C, Wald LL. Optimal SNR combinations of multi-channel coil data for GRAPPA-reconstructed and time-series EPI data. Proc ISMRM 2013;3355.
10. Robson PM, Grant AK, Madhuranthakam AJ, Lattanzi R, Sodickson DK, McKenzie CA. Comprehensive quantification of signal‐to‐noise ratio and g‐factor for image‐based and k‐space‐based parallel imaging reconstructions. Magn Reson Med 2008;60(4):895-907.
11. Uecker M, Lai P, Murphy MJ, Virtue P, Elad M, Pauly JM, Vasanawala SS, Lustig M. ESPIRiT—an eigenvalue approach to autocalibrating parallel MRI: where SENSE meets GRAPPA. Magn Reson Med 2014;71(3):990-1001.