Tzu-Cheng Chao1, Dinghui Wang1, Guruprasad Krishnamoorthy2, and James G. Pipe1
1Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States, 2Philips Healthcare, Gainesville, FL, United States
Synopsis
Deblurring with water/fat
separation plays a critical role in spiral imaging. The reconstruction quality depends on good off-resonant frequency estimation. A field map before
each spiral imaging exam is often acquired to approximate the B0 of the scanned subject. However, the estimation errors occur due to nonconcurrent collection of the imaging data. The proposed work introduces an iterative method to update
the field map based on the acquired images to improve spiral image
reconstruction. The results have shown that the blurring can be reduced along with
improved fat/water separation after updating the reference B0 used for reconstruction.
Purpose:
The use of spiral imaging
has drawn more attention in clinical application due to its high SNR efficiency
and being less prone to motion1-3. Image blurring due to off-resonance in spiral acquisition still
remains a challenge. Inaccuracies in field map estimation may degrade the quality of image deblurring approaches4-6. The present work proposed a self-reference model to estimate the
discrepancies of the field between the image data and the pre-acquired field estimation to
improve the image quality for the two-point Dixon spiral acquisition. Theory:
Both water and fat signals
are assumed in-phase at TE = 0. The signals at two different echo times can be
modeled by $$ S_1 = e^{j\theta}(W+F\Psi_1)e^{j \omega_0{TE}_1}, and $$ $$ S_2 = e^{j\theta}(W+F\Psi_2)e^{j \omega_0 {TE}_2} $$ ,where $$$ W $$$ and $$$ F $$$ are both real numbers, $$$ \theta $$$ is the underlying object phase, $$$\Psi_1$$$ and $$$ \Psi_2 $$$ are modeled normalized fat signals at $$$ {TE}_1 $$$ and $$$ {TE}_2$$$ respectively, and $$$ \omega_0 $$$ is the resonant frequency or the field map. The two-point Dixon algorithm estimates water ( $$$ W' $$$ ) and fat( $$$ F' $$$ ) components in terms of a reference resonant frequency $$$ \omega_{ref} $$$ as: $$ W' = (\Psi_2 - \Psi_1)^{-1} (\Psi_2S_1e^{-j \omega_{ref}{TE}_1} - \Psi_1S_2e^{-j \omega_{ref}{TE}_2}), and $$$$ F' = (\Psi_2 - \Psi_1)^{-1} (S_2e^{-j \omega_{ref}{TE}_2} - S_1e^{-j \omega_{ref}{TE}_1}). $$ Rewriting $$$ W'$$$ and $$$ F' $$$ as $$ W'+F'\Psi_1 = e^{j\theta}(W+F\Psi_1)e^{j \Delta \omega{TE}_1}, and $$ $$ W'+F'\Psi_2 = e^{j\theta}(W+F\Psi_2)e^{j \Delta \omega{TE}_2}$$, one can assess the mismatch between the frequencies, $$$ \Delta \omega \equiv \omega_0 - \omega_{ref} $$$. Accordingly, the field difference becomes $$ \Delta \omega = {1 \over {({TE}_2 - {TE}_1)}} arg({{(W'+F'\Psi_2) \bullet conj(W'+F'\Psi_1)} \over {(W+F\Psi_2) \bullet conj(W+F\Psi_1)}}) $$ with two unknown variables $$$ W $$$ and $$$ F $$$. These two variables can be
approximated by $$$ |W'| $$$ and $$$ |F'| $$$respectively as the equality
holds at $$$ \Delta \omega = 0 $$$. In practice, an iterative processing is applied to keep updating $$$ \omega_{ref} $$$ as well as both $$$ W' $$$ and $$$ F' $$$ as
shown in Fig. 1 until reaching the convergence criterion. The amount to update $$$ \omega_{ref} $$$
is controlled by a relaxation parameter $$$ \alpha $$$ to prevent from divergence due
to noise or numerical error. An empirical value $$$ \alpha = 0.5 $$$ was adopted in this work as far as speed and stability in computation was concerned.Materials and Methods
Volunteer studies were conducted on a 3.0T scanner (Ingenia Elition, Philips, Best, Netherlands) with informed
consent. Four participants were enrolled for the head scan and the other four
for the abdominal scan. The image sequences and the corresponding parameters are
listed in Table 1.
A separate scan for $$$ \omega_{ref} $$$ estimation was performed ahead of the image
acquisition. An additional 60 Hz offset was added to the pre-acquired field map
to simulate error estimation. The image data along with the
offset
field map were reconstructed with the proposed iterative
algorithm. The convergence criterion was set when the difference between the
reconstructed images of two consecutive iterations.Results
Figures 2 and 3 demonstrate the results from a
head scan and an abdominal scan from two different volunteers. Significant blurring exhibits over different parametric images as well as misplacement of fat and
water signals (Figs. 2 and 3 upper row). This blurring effect becomes
diminishing after updating the field map (Figs. 2 and 3 lower row). In the head
scan, better gray matter and white matter structure along with sharper
delineation of the extraocular muscles appears in the water image after
correction (Fig. 2). The optic nerve tracts are also more apparent in the in-phase image. The edges
of the vessels in the abdominal scan (Fig. 3) become better outlined from the
parenchyma with the corrected field map. The abdominal cage as well as the edge of the internal organs
become well defined in the water and in-phase images in addition to improved component separation. The field maps before and after correction in both scans demonstrate consistent quantitative differences with the added value in the error simulation.Discussions
An iterative method to update field map is proposed in the present work to improve deblurring of fat and water spiral image. The results suggest that the proposed method can mitigate blurring by improving the accuracy of the off-resonance values in
different anatomies. Although the range of frequency offsets the algorithm can correct has not been examined here, error is likely to occur if the offset exceeds the chemical shift between fat and water. Thus, this algorithm is not entirely autofocused, and a reasonable field map estimation and good shimming still play essential roles in the final image quality. With these in place, the proposed method should be capable of updating the field map for all the subsequent scans in the same experiment.Conclusions
A
semi-autofocus algorithm to update the field map for two-point Dixon spiral
imaging was proposed and tested in the present work. This algorithm features
correcting fat-water swap and minimizing blurring artifact by updating the field
map from the image data and an approximate field map reference. Acknowledgements
This work was funded in part by Philips Healthcare.References
1. X. Feng, et al., Non-Cartesian balanced steady-state free precession pulse sequences for
real-time cardiac MRI. Magn Reson Med, 2016. 75(4): p. 1546-55.
2. A.B. Kerr, et al., Real-time interactive MRI
on a conventional scanner. Magn Reson Med, 1997. 38(3): p. 355-67.
3. C.H. Meyer, et al., Fast spiral coronary artery
imaging. Magn Reson Med, 1992. 28(2):
p. 202-13.
4. L.C. Man, et al., Improved
automatic off-resonance correction without a field map in spiral imaging.
Magn Reson Med, 1997. 37(6): p. 906-13.
5. T.B. Smith, et al., Automatic
off-resonance correction in spiral imaging with piecewise linear autofocus.
Magn Reson Med, 2013. 69(1): p.
82-90.
6. D. Wang, et al., Joint
water-fat separation and deblurring for spiral imaging. Magn Reson Med,
2018. 79(6): p. 3218-3228.