Tess E. Wallace1,2, Onur Afacan1,2, Tobias Kober3,4,5, and Simon K. Warfield1,2
1Computational Radiology Laboratory, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States, 2Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States, 3Advanced Clinical Imaging Technology, Siemens Healthcare, Lausanne, Switzerland, 4Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, 5LTS5, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland
Synopsis
FIDnavs can be
acquired extremely rapidly using standard scanner hardware and are consequently
an attractive tracking strategy for prospective motion correction (PMC), which
requires accurate pose updates to be passed to the sequence with minimal delay.
In this work, we demonstrate for the first time the efficacy of PMC using
FIDnav motion estimates in a moving phantom and in volunteers performing deliberate
head motion. Real-time pose updates from measured FIDnavs enabled substantial
improvements in image quality in structural scans acquired with motion. FID-navigated
PMC is a promising method for motion-robust imaging of patients who have
difficulty staying still during imaging.
Introduction
Motion
artifacts remain a major challenge for acquiring high-quality MRI in
uncooperative subjects. Prospective motion correction (PMC) aims to compensate
for motion-induced errors in spatial encoding by updating the imaging
volume in response to measured changes in head position. However, successful
PMC requires accurate pose estimates to be passed to the sequence with minimal
delay to avoid introducing additional ‘pseudo-motion’ artifacts into the images.1 Free induction decay navigators
(FIDnavs) have been shown to encode accurate rigid-body motion information2,3 and are highly suited for
real-time applications as they can be rapidly acquired on the order of
microseconds.4 In this work, we introduce a
novel method for PMC using FIDnavs and an extended Kalman filtering (EKF)
framework and demonstrate its ability to successfully compensate for motion in
3D structural imaging.Methods
Motion Model. Real-time motion tracking from FIDnavs was performed using the
EKF algorithm with the following
state-space model:5
$$$\bf{x_k}=\bf{Ax_{k-1}}+\bf{w_k}$$$ with $$$\bf{w_k}\sim{N(0,\bf{Q_k})}$$$
$$$\bf{y_k}=\bf{Hx_k}+\bf{v_k}$$$ with $$$\bf{v_k}\sim{N(0,\bf{R_k})}$$$
where $$$\bf{x_k}$$$ contains the rigid-body motion estimates at
time step $$$k$$$ and $$$\bf{y_k}$$$ is
a vector of the real and imaginary components of the FIDnav. Head motion
dynamics are modelled as a random walk, i.e. $$$\bf{A}=\bf{I}$$$.
The measurement model $$$\bf{H}$$$ is a linearized approximation of how FIDnav
measurements relate to underlying rigid-body motion parameters; $$$\bf{w_k}$$$ and $$$\bf{v_k}$$$ are Gaussian random vectors, with
covariance $$$\bf{Q_k}$$$ and $$$\bf{R_k}$$$.
Model
Calibration. To calibrate the system, low-resolution (4-mm)3 3D
FLASH images, with contrast parameters designed to match the FIDnav, were acquired
on the surface and body coils. Raw data was transferred to an external computer
for image reconstruction and simulation of the effects of relative motion
between the modeled coil profiles and the object. This calibration process
(Fig. 1) was performed once at the beginning of each scan session.
FID-navigated PMC. An FIDnav module (20 samples in 125 μs;
TNAV = 1 ms) was integrated into a 3D FLASH sequence every repetition
time, following RF excitation and before the imaging readout. Complex FIDnav
signals were averaged and used to update the EKF model parameters each TR. The
Kalman gain, which controls the ratio between measurement and process noise,
was chosen empirically ($$$K=0.001$$$)
to give a reasonable trade-off between noise suppression and tracking ability. Motion
estimates were calculated in the real-time processing unit of the vendor image
reconstruction system and passed to the correction module in the sequence, which updates
the applied gradients and RF pulses to compensate for rotational and
translational motion (Fig. 1).
MRI Experiments. A pineapple was scanned at 3T (MAGNETOM Prisma,
Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) with a 64-channel head coil. Three consecutive
FID-navigated 3D FLASH volumes (TE/TR=3.5/10 ms; FA=25°; RBW=400 Hz/px; matrix
size=128x128x56; in-plane resolution 1.8 mm2; 4-mm slice thickness) were acquired with a single motion event during the second volume and PMC
enabled. The accuracy of FIDnav motion estimates was assessed relative to
rigid-body registration of image volumes acquired in both positions with PMC
off.
Two volunteers were scanned following written, informed
consent. Four sagittal T1-weighted anatomical scans were acquired in
each subject (TE/TR=4/10 ms; FA=30°; RBW=400 Hz/px; matrix size=256x256x128;
in-plane resolution 1 mm2; 2-mm slice thickness) with and without deliberate
motion (head shaking every 1-minute), and with and without PMC enabled. Normalized
root-mean-square error (NRMSE) and structural similarity index (SSIM) were
computed following rigid-body registration to the reference no-motion image.
Results
Sagittal views of the pineapple acquired with 18 mm
translation along the z-axis (A) and 10° rotation around the x-axis (B), with
and without PMC, are shown in Figure 2. FID-navigated PMC successfully maintained
a fixed relationship between the object and scanner co-ordinate frame, with
mean absolute errors of 1.1 mm and 1.2°.
Figure 3 shows a four-way comparison between scans acquired with and without subject motion, and with and without PMC. The corresponding real-time motion estimates are shown in Figure 4, which are consistent with instructions given to subjects. In the no motion scans, FID-navigated PMC did not introduce any additional artifacts. In scans with deliberate head motion, a substantial reduction in ringing and blurring artifacts was achieved with FID-navigated PMC, compared to scans with PMC off (Fig. 5). Across both volunteers,
NRMSE decreased from
4.33% ± 1.00% to 2.97% ± 0.01% with PMC; SSIM increased
from 0.93 ± 0.05 to 0.97 ± 0.03.Discussion
Our initial results demonstrate for the first time that online
motion parameters can be estimated from ultra-short FIDnavs and prospectively
applied to compensate for motion in 3D FLASH structural scans. Image quality was substantially improved in volunteers when PMC was enabled during motion. Residual artifacts may be
due to small tracking errors or induced B0 field changes, currently
not accounted for in the motion model. The total
time required for reference data acquisition and processing was <5 minutes,
which may be reduced in future iterations using on-scanner reconstruction and
calibration. Unlike other navigator methods, which typically require sufficient
dead time (~300-500 ms) to be present in the sequence, FIDnavs do not require
spatial gradient encoding or image reconstruction, and the linearized model facilitates
rapid, non-iterative motion estimation. Conclusion
FID-navigated PMC enables real-time motion compensation, without the need for specialized tracking hardware, which
has potential to substantially improve structural MRI in uncooperative patient
populations.Acknowledgements
This research was supported in part by NIH
grants R01 EB019483, R01 NS079788, R01 DK100404, R44 MH086984, IDDRC U54
HD090255, and by an Early Career Award from the Thrasher Research Fund.References
1. Maclaren, J.,
Herbst, M., Speck, O. & Zaitsev, M. Prospective motion correction in brain
imaging: A review. Magn. Reson. Med. 69, 621–636 (2013).
2. Babayeva, M. et al. Accuracy and
precision of head motion information in multi-channel free induction decay
navigators for magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 34,
1879–1889 (2015).
3. Wallace, T. E., Afacan, O., Waszak, M.,
Kober, T. & Warfield, S. K. Head motion measurement and correction using
FID navigators. Magn. Reson. Med. 81, 258–274 (2019).
4. Kober, T., Marques, J. P., Gruetter, R.
& Krueger, G. Head motion detection using FID navigators. Magn. Reson.
Med. 66, 135–43 (2011).
5. Spincemaille, P., Nguyen, T. D., Prince,
M. R. & Wang, Y. Kalman filtering for real-time navigator processing. Magn.
Reson. Med. 60, 158–168 (2008).