Yiming Wang1, Limin Zhou1, Sheng Qing Lin1, Joshua S. Greer1,2, and Ananth J. Madhuranthakam1,3
1Radiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States, 2Pediatrics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States, 3Advanced Imaging Research Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
Synopsis
3D arterial spin
labeled (ASL) MRI using turbo spin echo (TSE) based acquisitions suffer from
image blurring, due to T2 decay along the echo train. To date,
several methods have been proposed to reduce T2 blurring, including
k-space filtering and variable flip angle schemes. In this study, the performances
of k-space filtering was compared with variable flip angle scheme to compensate
or reduce T2 blurring of 3D ASL images acquired with Cartesian TSE.
Results showed k-space filtered images provided similar sharpness improvement
compared with variable flip angle method.
Introduction
3D TSE and GRASE
acquisitions are recommended for brain ASL because of their high SNR and
compatibility with optimal background suppression [1]. While 3D TSE
acquisitions are more robust to B0 inhomogeneities, they suffer from
image blurring due to T2 decay along the long echo trains. Several
methods have been proposed to reduce or compensate T2 blurring, including
k-space filtering [2, 3] and variable flip angle schemes [4].
While variable flip angle methods can reduce T2 blurring, it needs
optimization and may be more sensitive to B1 inhomogeneities
compared to constant refocusing flip angle method. In this study, we compared the
variable flip angle schemes [4] implemented in 3D Cartesian TSE
acquisition, with k-space filtering method [2] using a constant
refocusing flip angle scheme for robust 3D ASL images of brain perfusion.Methods
Variable flip angle schemes: Variable flip angle schemes were designed using the
extended phase graph (EPG) algorithm [5] using gray matter T1 and
T2 [6], inversely calculated from the predefined signal
shapes along the echo train. The signal shapes were defined either as a Fermi
or Hann function (‘direct Fermi’ or ‘direct Hann’ [4]), or the
adapted forms (‘optimal Fermi’ or ‘optimal Hann’ [4]) which used
increased amplitudes in the first few echoes to improve SNR. Maximum amplitudes and linewidths allowed by
the EPG algorithm were used for these signal shapes for the benefit of SNR, by
means of iterating among a range of different values. A Fermi filter was then used
with optimized radius (r = 56) and
width (w = 8) to increase the overall
SNR of the images. The resultant signals of different variable flip angle schemes
were simulated as well using the EPG algorithm to validate the calculated flip
angles.
k-space filtering method: A k-space
filtering method was designed as the inverse of the EPG simulated signal along
the echo train to compensate for the T2 decay modulation, combined with
a Fermi function to minimize the noise contribution in the later echoes. The k-space
filter intensity increases before reaching the 50% of the ETL and progressively
decays to 0 at the end of the echo train. This k-space filtering method was
applied to ASL images acquired with a constant refocusing flip angles of 120°.
MR Acquisition: This study used pseudo-continuous
ASL (pCASL) with optimized background suppression and a 3D TSE Cartesian
acquisition with Spiral Profile Reordering (CASPR) on a 3T scanner (Ingenia,
Philips Healthcare) [7]. 3D ASL was performed in 2 healthy
volunteers with IRB approval. The imaging parameters were: TR/TE = 6000/14 ms,
FOV = 220x220x110 mm3, matrix = 64x64 with 36 slices, acquired
resolution = 3.5x3.5x6 mm3, reconstructed resolution = 3x3x3 mm3,
label duration = 1.8 s, post-label delay = 1.8 s, 1 repetition, 4 background
suppression pulses and acquisition time = 3:00 minutes. A M0 image
was acquired using same acquisition parameters in 1:30 minutes. Other
parameters were echo spacing = 2.8 ms and ETL = 80. Each volunteer was scanned
with 5 ASL acquisitions with different refocusing flip angle schemes, including
constant, direct Fermi, direct Hann, optimal Fermi, and optimal Hann.
Image analysis: The k-space
filtering combined with the Fermi windowing was implemented on the scanner reconstruction
platform (Philips Recon 2.0). A blur metric was used to quantitatively determine
the blurring of the images [8].Results
Fig. 1
shows the flip angle schemes of different methods along the echo train (ETL =
80), where the ‘optimal’ methods have larger values than ‘direct’ methods, in
particular for the first few refocusing flip angles. Fig. 2c-f show the EPG
simulated signals of different flip angle designs, where the signals at the peripheral
k-space are better maintained than the constant flip angle design (Fig. 2a), to
which a truncated k-space filter (Fig. 2b) was applied to demodulate the signal
decay. Fig. 3c-f show the 3D brain ASL images in a volunteer using different
variable flip angle schemes, compared against the constant flip angle image without
(Fig. 3a) and with (Fig. 3b) k-space filtering, showing reduced blurring with
both variable flip angle and k-space filtering methods. Fig. 4 shows the blur
metric values calculated at the central slices in the 3D ASL images acquired in
2 healthy volunteers with variable flip angle schemes, compared against the
values of constant flip angle images without and with k-space filtering. ASL
images acquired with constant refocusing flip angles combined with k-space
filtering showed similar blur metric values compared with images acquired using
variable flip angle schemes (Fig. 4).Discussion and Conclusion
Variable
flip angle schemes were designed and applied to 3D brain ASL images acquired
with 3D Cartesian TSE, and its performance in reducing T2 blurring was
compared against k-space filtering with constant flip angle methods. Optimized
k-space filtering with constant refocusing flip angle could achieve similar
deblurring provided by variable flip angle schemes, and can be more robust to B1
inhomogeneities. Future study will consider comparing these two methods
systematically in more volunteers and evaluate its sensitivity to B1
inhomogeneities. Acknowledgements
This work was partly supported by the NIH/NCI grant U01CA207091.References
[1]
Alsop, DC et al. MRM 2015; 73(1):102-116.
[2]
Wang, Y et al. ISMRM 2019:4962.
[3]
Galazzo, IB et al. ISMRM 2014:2704.
[4]
Zhao, L et al. MRM 2018; 80(4):1391-1401.
[5]
Hennig, J et al. MRM 2004; 51(1):68-80.
[6] Wright,
PJ et al. MAGMA 2008; 21(1-2):121-130.
[7] Greer,
JS et al. MRM 2019; 82(5):1713-1724.
[8] Crete-Roffe, F et al.
HVEI 2007; 12:6492-6416.