The Signal Profile Asymmetries for Robust multi-Compartment Quantification (SPARCQ) framework was recently developed and used to quantify water and fat content in tissues. Applying SPARCQ on bSSFP signal profiles obtained from phase-cycled acquisitions provided reliable fat fractions with a total scan time of 20:21min at low resolution. In this study, SPARCQ was accelerated and optimized for water-fat separation using numerical simulations and in vivo experiments to obtain a clinically acceptable protocol. Images and fat-fraction maps of knees at an isotropic resolution of (1.25mm)3 were obtained with a scan time of 7:12min.
[1] Rossi, Giulia M.C. A new approach to water fat separation in magnetic resonance imaging (MSc thesis) Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) (2019)
[2] Miller, K. L. Asymmetries of the balanced SSFP profile. Part I: theory and observation. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: An Official Journal of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 63.2 pp.385-395 (2010)
[3] Bieri, Oliver and Scheffler, Klaus. Fundamentals of Balanced Steady State Free Precession MRI. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 38:2–11(2013)
[4] Hargreaves, Brian. Bloch Simulator, MRI Tools. http://mrsrl.stanford.edu/~brian/bloch
[5] Griswold, Mark A. et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: An Official Journal of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 47.6: 1202-1210 (2002)
[6] Çukur, Tolga. Accelerated phase-cycled SSFP imaging with compressed sensing. IEEE transactions on medical imaging 34.1: 107-115 (2014)
[7] Lustig, Michael et al. Compressed sensing MRI. IEEE signal processing magazine 25.2: 72 (2008)
Figure 1
Top: Amplitude of the steady-state transverse magnetization vector as a function of the precession angle \Phi accumulated during a TR of 4.54ms (A) and 3.41ms (B). Water is assumed to be on-resonance. Asterisks indicate the points at which peaks are read out. Bottom (C): Relative distance between the water and fat peaks wrapped into a 1/TR period. A TR that maximizes the distance \Delta f_{peak} corresponds to a difference in precession angle \Delta \Phi = k\pi, k \in ℕ (green). A TR choice for which signals overlap correspond to \Delta \Phi = 0 (red).
Figure 2
Error between the simulated fat fraction and the estimated fat fraction quantified by SPARCQ as a function of TR. A periodic behaviour can be observed. The error is highest for those TR values where \Phi is nearly equal for both water and fat, i.e. where their bSSFP profiles are similar. The SPARCQ framework favors the estimation of the on-resonance component, i.e. water. For non-optimized TRs fat may be wrongly classified as water and this effect becomes more pronounced for higher fat fractions. Conversely, watery tissues (FF<0.25) will be correctly estimated for all TRs.
Figure 3
Mean error (over 500 repetitions) in the fat fraction estimation as a function of SNR and the number of phase-cycled bSSFP acquisitions N_{\phi} at fixed simulated fat fractions FF \in [0;1]. The error is computed as the difference between the simulated fat fraction (treated as ground truth) and the one estimated by SPARCQ. Therefore warm tones (red) on the plot represent underestimations while cool tones (blue) represent overestimations by SPARCQ.
Figure 4
Mean fat-fraction estimation \mu_{FF} (dotted line) and standard deviation \sigma_{FF} (shaded area) calculated in three ROIs in the knee containing 25 pixels each.
Figure 5
A and B. Comparison of the quantitative fat fraction maps (top) and the corresponding fat images (bottom) reconstructed by SPARCQ for the reference low-resolution protocol (A) and the accelerated high-resolution protocol (B). A signal void can be observed in the patella region. The SPARCQ frequency spectrum of this signal void (C) shows a misclassification of the on-resonance peak as water. Future studies will use the shape of the spectrum for classification of the water and fat signal. D. Scan and sequence parameters for both protocols.