Lin Chen1,2,3, Anja Soldan4, Kenichi Oishi1, Andreia Faria1, Marilyn Albert4, Peter C.M. Van zijl1,2, and Xu Li1,2
1Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States, 2F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States, 3Department of Electronic Science, Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Plasma and Magnetic Resonance, Xiamen University, XIAMEN, China, 4Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
Synopsis
We investigated
the associations between brain iron levels, as measured by QSM MRI, and amyloid-β plaque load as measured by 11C-PiB PET
imaging, and their possible synergistic effect on both global composite
and domain specific cognitive functions, including memory, visuospatial processing and language.
Various association patterns were observed between iron load and amyloid-β deposition in
voxel-based analysis. More importantly, in cognitively normal adults, iron
levels in several brain regions were found negatively associated with cognition.
This was independent of amyloid-β load,
suggesting that the impact of iron on cognition may be related to other known molecular
changes during early aging.
Introduction
Alzheimer’s
Disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia.1 Recent studies
suggest that, together with the well-known amyloid-β and tau pathology2-4, cerebral iron overload may play
an important role in AD pathogenesis. In
addition, the interaction between iron and amyloid-β may further promote the neurodegeneration and cognitive decline in
AD5-7. However, the local correlations between iron and amyloid-β and their possible combined effects on
different cognitive domain functions in normal aging are still poorly
understood. In this study, voxel-level correlations between iron levels from quantitative
susceptibility mapping (QSM) measures and amyloid-β plaque load based on 11C-PiB PET imaging were
investigated, together with their possible effect on global and domain
specific cognitive functions. Methods
Ninety-seven
participants (68.7 ± 9.0 y/o, 35 males) were recruited through the BIOCARD cohort8,9. Among
them, 76 were categorized as cognitively normal and 21 as impaired but not MCI
(i.e. Subject or other source expressed concerns about cognitive changes but
the cognitive testing did not show changes, or vice versa10). Global
cognitive composite score was calculated based on 4 individual measures8,
multiple
domains of cognition score (verbal episodic memory, executive function,
visuospatial processing, and language) were assessed from neuropsychological
tests8. For susceptibility imaging, subjects were scanned on
a 3T Philips scanner using a 3D multi-echo GRE sequence (TR/TE1/∆TE = 40/6/6
ms, 5 echoes, voxel size = 1×1×1 mm3). QSM processing involved best-path based
phase unwrapping11, VSHARP-background field removal12 and
SFCR13. The dynamic 11C-PiB PET studies were performed on
a GE Advance scanner and Distribution volume ratio (DVR) images were calculated
in the native space of each PET image14. Selected ROIs in superior
and middle frontal gyrus (SMF), inferior and orbital frontal gyrus (IOF),
parietal, temporary, occipital and entorhinal cortex (ENT), cingulate, amygdala
and hippocampus were extracted using a multi-atlas approach (mricloud.org) and
further combined with a gray matter mask generated using FSL FAST. Caudate
nucleus (CN), putamen (PT) and globus pallidus (GP) were extracted by co-registering
individual QSM image to a group averaged QSM template with manual segmentation.
The Biological Parametric Mapping (BPM) toolbox was used to estimate the
voxel-based correlations between iron and β-amyloid load. Analysis was
performed using robust Huber regression correcting for age, gender, APOE ε4
status. One-way T-tests were used to investigate potential correlations (FWE-corrected
cluster-level p < 0.05 combined
with an uncorrected voxel-level p <
0.001), with a cluster size threshold of 200 voxels. To estimate the impact of
β-amyloid and iron on cognitive function in significant clusters, ridge
regressions were used with a global cognitive composite score as outcome and
age, gender, APOE ε4, years of education, β-amyloid load and iron load as
predictors. Furthermore, multiple linear regression models, with cognitive
scores (global composite and domain-specific cognition scores) as outcome, and age,
gender, APOE ε4, years of education, volume, DVR and QSM as predictors, were
used to test the effect of ROI-based β-amyloid and iron load on cognition. All analyses were performed in cognitively normal
subjects (Model 1) and repeated
excluding impaired but not MCI subjects (Model 2).Results
The BPM analysis
resulted in 9 clusters of negative correlation (blue) and 3 clusters of
positive correlation (red) between susceptibility and DVR (Fig.1(A)). Among the
9 clusters, two showed a negative association between susceptibility and the global
cognitive composite score: frontal cortex [β=-0.126, p=0.020] and cingulate
[β=-0.106, p=0.047] (Fig. 1(B)). Regarding Model 2, similar results were
obtained (7 clusters showing a negative association between susceptibility and
DVR, with two clusters in the frontal and temporal cortex showing negative
associations between susceptibility and global cognitive composite score). The
ROI-based analysis also revealed negative correlations between global cognitive
performance and iron in SMF [β=-0.219, p=0.041], cingulate [β=-0.219, p=0.046] and GP [β=-0.264, p=0.015], while DVR did not show significant
associations with cognition. For Model 2, negative correlations between
cognition and iron were observed in all ROIs, except amygdala and ENT (Table 1).
For domain-specific cognition, a negative correlation was observed in
hippocampus [β=-0.239, p=0.048] between episodic memory and iron in Model 1, while the
correlations for Model 2 were significant in all ROIs, except for amygdala and
basal ganglia (Table 2). Negative associations between visuospatial processing score and iron
were observed in hippocampus [β=-0.360, p=0.002] and GP [β=-0.257, p=0.012]; Similar
results were found in Model 2 (Table 3). Language score and susceptibility were found
negatively associated in ENT [β=-0.247, p=0.030] and GP [β=-0.281, p=0.008], additional
negative correlations were also observed in CN for Model 2 (Table 4).Discussion and Conclusion
Among cognitively normal individuals, iron load in
several brain regions was negatively associated with both amyloid-β deposition
and global and domain-specific cognitive functions. This contrasts with the
reported positive association between iron and amyloid-β among patients with
MCI and dementia and their possible synergistic impairment on cognition6,7.
Instead, the present study suggests that the impact of increased brain iron
load on cognition in cognitively normal individuals may be related to other molecular
changes known to occur during aging, beyond increased β-amyloid plaque load.Acknowledgements
Funding support: NCRR and NIBIB (P41 EB015909). References
[1] Viola KL, Klein WL. Amyloid beta oligomers in
Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis, treatment, and diagnosis. Acta Neuropathol.
2015;129(2):183-206.
[2]
Acosta-Cabronero J, Williams GB, et al. In vivo quantitative susceptibility
mapping (QSM) in Alzheimer's disease. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e81093.
[3]
Kim HG, Park S, Rhee HY, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping to evaluate
the early stage of Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage Clin. 2017;16:429-438.
[4]
Lane DJR, Ayton S and Bush AI. Iron and Alzheimer's Disease: An update on emerging
mechanisms. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2018;64(s1):S379-S395.
[5]
van Bergen JM, Li X, Hua J, et al. Colocalization of cerebral iron with Amyloid
beta in Mild Cognitive Impairment. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:35514.
[6]
Ayton S, Fazlollahi A, Bourgeat P, et al. Cerebral quantitative susceptibility
mapping predicts amyloid-beta-related cognitive decline. Brain 2017;140(8):2112-2119.
[7]
van Bergen JMG, Li X, Quevenco FC, et al. Simultaneous quantitative
susceptibility mapping and Flutemetamol-PET suggests local correlation of iron
and beta-amyloid as an indicator of cognitive performance at high age.
Neuroimage 2018;174:308-316.
[8]
Albert M, Soldan A, Gottesman R, et al. Cognitive changes preceding clinical
symptom onset of mild cognitive impairment and relationship to ApoE genotype.
Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2014;11(8):773-784.
[9]
Soldan A, Pettigrew C, Cai Q, et al. Cognitive reserve and long-term change in
cognition in aging and preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol. Aging 2017;60:164-172.
[10]
Albert M, Dekosky S, Dickson D, et al. The diagnosis of mild cognitive
impairment due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National
Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines
for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011; 7(3):270-279.
[11]
Abdul-Rahman HS, Gdeisat MA, Burton DR, et al. Fast and robust
three-dimensional best path phase unwrapping algorithm. Appl Opt 2007;46(26):6623-6635.
[12]
Schweser F, Deistung A, Lehr BW, et al. Quantitative imaging of intrinsic
magnetic tissue properties using MRI signal phase: an approach to in vivo brain
iron metabolism? Neuroimage 2011;54(4):2789-2807.
[13]
Bao L, Li X, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping using structural
feature based collaborative reconstruction (SFCR) in the human brain. IEEE
Trans Med Imaging 2016;35(9):2040-2050.
[14]
Zhou Y, Resnick SM, Ye W, et al. Using a reference tissue model with spatial
constraint to quantify [11C]Pittsburgh compound B PET for early diagnosis of
Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage 2007;36(2):298-312.