Samuel Anthony Hurley1, Matthew G Spangler-Bickell2, Timothy Deller3, Timothy W Skloss3, Floris P Jansen3, Tyler J Bradshaw1, and Alan B McMillan1
1Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, United States, 2Nuclear Medicine Unit, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy, 3GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, United States
Synopsis
Motion during PET acquisition will result in blurring, which
may reduce the diagnostic value of the images and cause inaccurate quantitation.
Motion during an MR exam results in image replicates and ghosting along the
phase encoding direction and other effects due to inconstant phase, rendering
images non-diagnostic. In this work, we evaluate the ability of an optical motion tracking system to simultaneously enable prospective correction in MR and retrospective correction in PET of rigid body head motion.
Introduction
Motion during PET acquisition will result in blurring, which
may reduce the diagnostic value of the images and cause inaccurate quantitation.
Motion during an MR exam results in image replicates and ghosting along the
phase encoding direction and other effects due to inconstant phase, rendering
images non-diagnostic. Many methods have been proposed in the literature, but no commercial solution exists for arbitrary rigid
motion correction in a PET, only basic correction for respiratory and
cardiac motion in body. Frame-based image registration techniques have been
demonstrated, but have low temporal resolution and can be inaccurate. In MR imaging, external optical systems are available to correct
for motion artifacts [1,2]. In this work, we extend the application of an optical
MR motion correction system to head FDG PET imaging. Data are acquired such
that prospective correction of MR data and retrospective correction of PET list
mode data can be accomplished from the same dataset of motion estimates.Methods
PET data were acquired on a GE SIGNA PET/MR (GE Healthcare,
Waukesha, WI, USA). An optical camera (HobbitView Inc., San Jose, CA) was attached
to the 8-channel head coil with a 3D printed adapter, and a custom connector
located in the scanner bore, allowing fast installation/removal of the camera
and straightforward integration with existing patient workflow. The marker consists of an 8.5 x 4 cm curved piece of plastic
with a pattern of unique symbols, enabling the camera to identify vertices, and
is positioned on the patient’s forehead. Image processing is run in real time on
a dedicated Linux server synchronized with the scanner’s clock. Rigid body
motion estimates are recorded at 50 frames per second, and used to
retrospectively correct list mode data during reconstruction.
Seven subjects were scanned
with informed consent, in accordance with all local ethics policies, after injection
of 18F-FDG and a short uptake duration. A 15-minute time of flight
(TOF) PET scan of the head was acquired, along with MR based attenuation correction.
The subject was instructed to hold still for 6 mins (static reference data),
then gently rock their head from left to right for 6 mins to simulate
non-compliant patient motion. Structural MR imaging
using 3D BRAVO (TR = 8.2 ms, TE = 3.1 ms, TI = 450 ms, 240x240 matrix, 240 x 240 FOV, 60 slices, 1 mm thk, 1 mm isotropic resolution) was acquired with and without prospective motion correction
enabled for both periods of rest and motion during the exam.
TOF-OSEM reconstructions with were performed in MATLAB
(R2018b, Mathworks, Natick, MA) using GE Healthcare’s list mode reconstruction
software with standard clinical reconstruction settings. Three 5-minute frames
were reconstructed for comparison: non-motion reference (static), without
motion correction (NoMC), motion correction from camera data (MC).Results and Conclusions
The motion-corrected PET images (MC) exhibited substantial
recovery of image fidelity, were of diagnostic quality, and were visually
indistinguishable from static reference images, while the uncorrected motion PET images (NoMC) exhibited significant blurring, and were of non-diagnostic quality. The structural MR acquired during the motion portion of the exam, without prospective correction enabled, were also non-diagnostic. MR during the motion period of the exam with prospective correction enabled were of diagnostic quality, although still showed residual artefacts due to motion. Given the large motions subjects were instructed to perform, it is not expected that artefact-free images are recovered, however for smaller, involuntary motions full recovery of image fidelity was observed.
Root mean squared error (RMSE) of the PET values in the
brain were 3618 Bq/cc for MC and 4592 Bq/cc for NoMC, a 26.1% improvement. Peak
signal to noise ratio (PSNR) was 37.5 for MC and 35.4 for NoMC, a 7.7%
improvement. Structural similarity index (SSIM) was 0.89 for MC and 0.84 for
NoMC, a 5.6% improvement.
In this work, we demonstrate a clinically viable method for prospective
correction of structural brain MR imaging and simultaneous retrospective
correction of rigid body motion for head PET imaging in a seven subject. This
method can enable simultaneous PET/MR imaging of patients with movement
disorders (e.g. Parkinson’s disease) where motion is slow and continuous and
cannot be broken into discrete frames, eliminate the need to anesthetize
pediatric patients for brain scans, and improve the alignment of PET with MR
for attenuation correction and anatomical localization. Furthermore, all counts
are used in the list mode reconstruction, resulting in high SNR images.Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge support from the NIH (R01-EB026708), and financial support from GE Healthcare.References
[1] Maclaren et al. MRM 2012
[2] Maclaren et al. MRM 2017