Kelly T Smith1, Akira Kawashima2, Mark D Tyson3, Erik P Castle4, Alvin Silva1, Yuxiang Zhou1, Michael C Roarke1, and Ming Yang1
1Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, PHOENIX, AZ, United States, 2Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, United States, 3Urology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, PHOENIX, AZ, United States, 4Urology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, United States
Synopsis
The most prevalent malignancy in US men is
prostate cancer. Appropriate treatment regimen is dependent on accurate tumor
staging. Pelvic multiparametric MR (mpMRI) is the established modality for
tumor and nodal staging. C-11 choline is FDA approved in diagnosis of recurrent
prostate cancer. Introduction of a
hybrid time-of-flight PET/MR system affords the opportunity to perform a
combined C-11 choline PET + mpMRI for prostate cancer staging. We feel this system would be beneficial in
staging of treatment naïve high risk prostate cancer.
Introduction
Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy
and the second most common cause of cancer related mortality in American
men. Accurate diagnosis and staging is
crucial for determining appropriate treatment regimens. Currently, pelvic multiparametric MRI (mpMRI)
is the established imaging modality for lesion detection and nodal
staging. C-11 Choline PET is under FDA
approval in diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer by targeting robust cell
membrane synthesis in prostate cancer.1-4 Comparison of pelvic mpMRI
and C-11 Choline PET has previously demonstrated the role for both in restaging
of recurrence in prostatectomy patients.
The opportunity to combine C-11 Choline PET with pelvic mpMRI in a
single study has presented itself with the introduction hybrid time-of-flight PET/MR
system. We believe hybrid prostate C-11 Choline PET/MR has an improved
diagnostic and staging benefit in prostate cancer, particularly in high risk
types. Methods
Twenty men diagnosed with prostate cancer, risk
stratified as high risk or very high risk by National Comprehensive Cancer
Network (NCCN) criteria were prospectively chosen to participate in this
study. Exclusion criteria included any
patient who had distant metastases, additional malignancies, or who did not
achieve preoperative clearance. Eighteen
patients have currently been recruited for this ongoing study. This HIPAA-compliant prospective study was
approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). After informed consent was
obtained, each patient underwent 7-bed position, pelvis-to-head torso PET/MR
immediately after intravenous C-11 choline injection (12-14 mCi), followed by
focused hybrid prostate mpMRI. The mpMRI protocol consists of large
field-of-view T1 LAVA-FLEX pre- and post-contrast and diffusion weighted images
(DWI), as well as high resolution sequences include T2 fast relaxation fast
spin echo in all planes, DWI, and dynamic contrast enhanced sequences were
obtained. Contemporaneous PSA level was
documented. Uroradiologist review of the
abdominopelvic CT and pelvis mpMRI with minimum 2 week memory extinction
period. Dual-board certified nuclear
radiologist review of the focused C-11 choline PET was performed. A consensus
review of focused PET and MR with fusion images was also performed. The number
of primary tumors and their maximal standard uptake value (SUVmax) were
documented. Reviewer’s overall perceived
confidence level for TNM staging was assessed.
Surgical pathology from radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node
dissection was considered as standard of reference. Tumor staging was compared amongst pelvic
mpMRI, focused C-11 choline PET, and combined pelvic mpMRI and focused C-11
choline PET. TNM staging was compared to
the surgical pathology staging. Evaluation
of lymph nodes were evaluated by region and compared with CT, pelvic MRI, and
combined pelvic mpMRI and focused C-11 choline PET. Evaluation of bone lesions was compared among
bone scan, CT, MRI, and combined pelvic MRI and focused C-11 choline PET where
available. Descriptive statistics were used. Results
To date, 18 patients were enrolled and the
patient’s characteristics were shown in Figure 1. Mean age was 63.5 years and ranged from 45-71
years. Total PSA averaged 11.85 ng/mL. Gleason score from biopsy was 7 in 2, 8 in 5,
9 in 10, and 10 in 1 patient. Gleason
score from surgical pathology was 7 in 2, 8 in 2, and 9 in 9 patients. One of the 18 patients was shown to have
unexpected bone metastasis at L5 on PET/MR with false negative bone scan and
CT. Seventeen patients underwent surgery.
TNM staging per modality was shown in Table 2. Bone marrow metastasis was present in one of
18 patients. The reviewers’ perceived
confidence level was increased at the consensus review of MRI and focused
PET/MRI when compared with each modality.
Total of 22 prostate lesions were identified. Average SUVmax of the prostate lesions on the
PET torso was 5.9 and 7.0 on the focused PET.
Seventeen of the 18 patients had an increase in SUVmax (average 20%)
from torso to focused PET. Total of 19
tracer avid nodal regions were identified.
Average SUVmax of the tracer avid lymph nodes on the PET torso was 5.4
and 6.1 on the focused PET. Discussion
All lesions delineated on mpMRI which exhibited
increased C-11 Choline uptake were confirmed as malignant on surgical
pathology. Supplementation with the C-11
choline data improved staging accuracy in 5 of the 18 cases with the fusion of
the C-11 choline PET+mpMRI as most accurate in 3 of the 18 cases. The joint analysis of C-11 choline PET with
MR also adds confidence to radiologic diagnosis. Conclusion
Our preliminary results demonstrated a
comprehensive C-11 choline PET/MRI including body PET/MRI as well as
simultaneous focused pelvic PET/MRI and mpMRI improves preoperative staging in
untreated patients with high risk prostate cancer. Further analysis of the data is necessary to
optimize patient selection for which fusion C-11 choline PET+mpMRI is the most
accurate staging modality. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Giovacchini,
G., Picchio, M., Coradeschi, E., Scattoni, V., Bettinardi, V., Cozzarini, C., …
Messa, C. (2008). [11C]Choline uptake with PET/CT for the initial diagnosis of
prostate cancer: relation to PSA levels, tumour stage and anti-androgenic
therapy. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 35(6),
1065–1073.
2. Perez-Lopez,
R., Tunariu, N., Padhani, A. R., Oyen, W. J. G., Fanti, S., Vargas, H. A., …
Koh, D.-M. (2019). Imaging Diagnosis and Follow-up of Advanced Prostate Cancer:
Clinical Perspectives and State of the Art. Radiology, 292(2), 273–286.
3. Schiavina,
R., Scattoni, V., Briganti, A., Franceschelli, A., Sanguedolce, F., Bertaccini,
A., … Martorana, G. (2008). 11C-Choline-Positron Emission Tomography/
Computerised Tomography For Preoperative Lymph- Node Staging In
Intermediate-Risk And High-Risk Prostate Cancer: Comparison With Clinical
Staging Nomograms. European Urology Supplements, 7(3), 283.
4. Wibmer,
A. G., Burger, I. A., Sala, E., Hricak, H., Weber, W. A., & Vargas, H. A.
(2016). Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer. RadioGraphics, 36(1), 142–159.