Dinesh K Deelchand1 and Pierre-Gilles Henry1
1Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
Synopsis
The goal of this study
was to compare the spectral quality and metabolite concentrations obtained with
short echo-time 2D spiral MRSI and single-voxel spectroscopy (SVS) in the human
brain at 3T. Semi-LASER was used for localization (SVS) or pre-localization
(MRSI). MRSI was acquired in a transverse slice through the posterior cingulate
cortex (PCC), and SVS was from PCC. Results
show comparable spectral quality between acquisitions. Differences in
concentrations between the two techniques is likely due to the MRSI point-spread
function. This study shows feasibility of acquiring high-quality
spiral MRSI data similar in spectral quality to SVS within a few minutes.
Purpose
Proton
magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS) is a non-invasive technique
that enables measurement of the concentration of various metabolites in the
brain. MRS
data can be acquired using single-voxel
spectroscopy (SVS) or with magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI)1.
Although SVS is commonly used due to high spectral quality (localization,
optimized B0 shim and water suppression), it is limited to a single
volume-of-interest (VOI). In contrast, MRSI data are acquired simultaneously
from many VOIs covering a single or multiple slices.
To
our knowledge only one study compared SVS and MRSI in the human brain (at 4T)2.
The study used conventional MRSI technique which is associated with long scan
time. Several fast acquisition MRSI techniques3 are currently
available to drastically reduce MRSI scan time. Of these, spiral provides high
sampling efficiency in covering k-space. The aim of this study was to compare
the spectral quality and metabolite concentrations obtained with short
echo-time (TE) 2D spiral MRSI and SVS data in the human brain at 3
tesla.Methods
Healthy
subjects (N=4, 53±19 years old, male) were scanned on a 3T Siemens
Prisma scanner. The standard body
coil was used for transmit and a 32-channel head coil for receive.
MRSI data were acquired from an axial
slice positioned above the corpus callosum and containing the posterior
cingulate cortex (PCC) as shown in Figure 1. Spiral readout gradients were used
to simultaneously encode two spatial and one frequency dimensions (FOV=160×160 mm2,
matrix=16×16). To achieve a spectral bandwidth (SBW) of 1.14 kHz, spiral
readout with five spatial interleaves was used. For SVS acquisition (SBW=6 kHz),
a VOI of 14×14×20 mm3 (Figure 1) was selected to match the effective
voxel size of the MRSI acquisition (i.e. ~4 mL, no spatial filtering) and this VOI
was positioned in PCC which contains mostly white matter. All
MRS data were localized using semi-LASER4 (TR/TE=3000/29
ms). Metabolite (100 shots) and water reference scans data were collected with both
techniques. B0 shimming was
performed within the MRSI VOI (80×80x20 mm3) using FAST(EST)MAP
which resulted in water linewidth of 10±1 Hz across the large VOI. Metabolite
cycling was used to suppress the water signal, and outer volume suppression was
used to prevent lipid contamination. MRSI data reconstruction was performed in MATLAB.
All spectroscopic data was processed with MRspa5 and quantified
using LCModel6 with water scaling option. Concentrations difference between techniques was
compared using paired t-test.Results and Discussion
High-quality short TE
semi-LASER 1H spiral MRSI data were obtained in all participants. Figure
2 shows an example of MRSI dataset measured in one subject (total scan time 5
minutes), showing high spectral quality with very little lipid contamination (Figure
2).
Comparison between SVS
data and the corresponding MRSI data in PCC shows very similar spectral quality
and spectral pattern between acquisitions (Figure 3) with the MRSI data having
slightly narrower linewidth in the PCC voxel (water linewidth was 6.4±0.6 Hz
with MRSI and 6.9±0.8 Hz with SVS). Signals from the five major metabolites
e.g. N-acetyl aspartate (NAA), total creatine (tCr), choline containing
compounds (tCho), glutamate (Glu), and myo-inositol
(Ins) and other lower concentration metabolites are clearly visible in all
datasets. The SNR per unit volume per unit time were also comparable: 13±3 with
SVS vs. 11±2 with MRSI.
To have comparable number
of points between acquisition techniques, the SVS data (metabolite and water
reference scans) were down-sampled to a SBW of 1.2 kHz by selecting every 5
points in the time domain. The mean measured concentration of metabolites showed
a trend to be higher with spiral MRSI than SVS (Figure 4) especially for Glu,
Ins and tCr. Only tNAA was significantly different between acquisitions. One likely explanation
for this difference could be due to the PSF of the MRSI acquisition (Figure 2)
since no spatial filtering was applied during reconstruction of the MRSI data. This
would result in difference spectral contribution from neighboring voxels in the
MRSI data compared to the sharper profile of the SVS VOI. We plan to perform additional
experiments using spatial filter in the MRSI data with matching SVS VOI.
Conclusion
The
current study demonstrates the feasibility of acquiring high-quality
short TE spiral MRSI data similar to the spectral quality usually
obtained with SVS in the human brain within
the same acquisition time (~5 min). The difference in
concentration observed between the two MRS techniques are likely related to the
PSF differences between the MRSI and SVS acquisitions.Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NIH grants: P41 EB027061, P30
NS076408 and 1S10OD017974-01References
[1]
Wilson et al. Mag Reson Med 2019
[2]
McNab and Bartha NMR Biomed 2006
[3]
Shankar et al. NMR Biomed 2019
[4]
Öz and Tkac Magn Reson Med. 2011
[5] MRspa:
https://www.cmrr.umn.edu/downloads/mrspa/
[6] Provencher Magn Reson Med. 1993