Hikari Yoshihara1, Nicolas Kunz2, Jean-Claude Martinou3, and Hongxia Lei2
1Laboratory for Metabolic Imaging, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2Animal Imaging and Technology Core (AIT), Center for Biomedical Imaging (CIBM), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, 3Faculty of Science, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
Synopsis
Dynamic shimming updates with first- and second-order shims are essential for dual-voxel spectroscopy of mouse cortex and hippocampus at high magnetic field. We show
that DSU is feasible for studying pharmacological effects in transgenic mice at 14.1 T.
INTRODUCTION
At high magnetic field, the challenges for multivoxel MRS in murine
brains are substantially amplified. For instance, first- and second-order shim correction becomes essential
to improve local field homogeneity. Thus, we aimed first to demonstrate the
feasibility of acquiring in vivo high-field 1H MR spectra
concurrently from both the mouse cortex and
hippocampus at 14.1T using dynamic
shim updates (DSU) on
both shims without any
supplementary hardware. The second aim was to apply the DSU approach to mice with
glutamatergic neurons devoid of mitochondrial pyruvate carrier 1 (MPC1)1 and
to their control littermates following i.p. injection of the GABAa receptor
antagonist pentylenetetrazole (PTZ). Changes in the hippocampal neurochemical
profile might occur, given the abundance of glutamatergic neurons there.METHODS
Animals :
Eight male MPC1CAM2HO/TG mice bearing the modified MPC1 at glutamatergic
neurons by the insertion of two flanking loxP sites that enable excision gene through Cre-mediated recombination were used for this
study.1 Four were treated with tamoxifen dissolved in oil to generate
the MPC1-/- genotype, and the other four received oil alone to remain
MPC1+/+. On scanning days, all mice were anesthetized with 3% isoflurane
mixed with 1:1 air and oxygen and their breathing rates were thereafter
maintained in the range of 80-110bpm by adjusting the percentage of isoflurane
(1-2%). 30min before the MRS measurements, mice were administered i.p. 20mg/kg
pentylenetetrazole (PTZ), corresponding to half the dose that induced seizures in
MPC1-/- mice in preliminary experiments (not shown). The head was
fixed with two ear pieces and one bite bar, and rectal temperature was
maintained at ~36ºC via circulating warm water via silicone tubes.
MR methods:
All experiments were performed in a horizontal 14.1T scanner, equipped
with 400mT/m gradients (200μsec rise time) interfaced to a
DirectDrive console (vnmrj, Agilent Inc.).
Second-order shim coils are with maximum strengths of Z2 = 5.3 × 10−2mT/cm2,
YZ = 1.2 × 10−1mT/cm2, XZ = 1.2 × 10−1mT/cm2,
XY = 4.5 × 10−2mT/cm2 and X2Y2 = 4.2 × 10−2mT/cm2.
A home-made quadrature surface coil (two geometrically decoupled 12mm-diameter
loops) resonating at 600MHz was used for radio-frequency transmission and
reception. Anatomical MR images were acquired using fast-spin-echo images (TEeffective/TE=50/4000ms,
nt=8). Field homogeneities were optimized using FASTMAP2 on mouse
unilateral cortex (1.8×0.8×2 mm3) and hippocampus (2.2×1.2×1.5 mm3),
and the parameter sets saved separately. Localized 1H MRS (TE/TR=2.8/4000ms)
was acquired using SPECIAL3. The optimized spectral parameters, including
excitation, water suppression, outer volume suppression and the number of averages
per scan (e.g. 16 averages per scan), for cortex and hippocampus were stored
separately. The spectral measurement windows were between 0.5-1 hour after the
PTZ-injection.
Dynamic Shim
Update (DSU):
With the corresponding shims and the optimized spectral parameters, the dynamic
shim update (DSU) acquisition scheme (Figure
1) was applied to both mouse cortex (DSUcortex) and hippocampus
(DSUhippocampus).
Data
processing:
The unsuppressed water signals acquired from the same VOIs were used for
quantification. Spectral data were then collected, frequency corrected and
summed for further analysis with LCModel. All metabolites except macromolecules
(Mac) in the basis set of the LCModel were simulated, i.e. alanine (Ala),
ascorbate (Asc), aspartate (Asp), creatine (Cr), myo-inositol (Ins), γ-aminobutryric
acid (GABA), glucose (Glc), glutamine (Gln), glutamate (Glu), glycine (Gly),
glycerophosphocholine (GPC), glutathione (GSH), lactate (Lac), N-acetyl-aspartate
(NAA), N-acetyl-aspartyl-glutamate (NAAG), phosphocholine (PCho),
phosphocreatine (PCr), phosphorylethanolamine (PE), scyllo-inositol (Scyllo),
and taurine (Tau).RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
DSU both 1st- and 2nd-order shims without any extra
hardware is feasible for dual-voxel spectroscopy at 14.1T. With updating the 2nd-order shims (Table 1), quality spectra were obtained
in an interleaved fashion from two brain regions, i.e. cortex and hippocampus (Figure
2). The resulting linewidths and SNRs were 16±2Hz and 10±1.5 for cortex,
and 11±2Hz and 16±1.2 for hippocampus, respectively. The quantified
neurochemical profiles of both MPC1+/+ and MPC1-/- mice are
summarized in Figure 3. Although the
metabolic changes due to the low dose of PTZ under isoflurane anesthesia are
not substantial and remain to be explored further, regional differences in Lac,
Ins and Glu were noticeable (Figure 4).
Since DSU enables interleaved acquisition of both cortex and hippocampus
regions, the metabolite difference, e.g. lactate (Figure 4a), cannot be biased by differences in isoflurane exposure,
a potentially confounding factor if the two regions were scanned sequentially. In
addition, the DSU scheme offers concurrently studying two important and
distinct brain regions in the very same animal upon a small dosage of the GABAa
receptor antagonist, i.e. PTZ. A consistently lower GABA level was observed in the
hippocampus of MPC1+/+ mice (unpaired student t-test p-vaule<0.05, Figure 3b). In summary, we show that DSU of interleaved high-field
spectral acquisition is feasible for studying pharmacological effects in transgenic
mice.Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the CIBM of the UNIL,
UNIGE, HUG; CHUV, EPFL and Leenaards and Louis-Jeantet Foundations.References
1. Vanderperre
B, Herzig S, Krznar P, et al. PLoS Genet.
2016;12:e1006056.
2. Gruetter R,
Tkac I. Magn Reson Med. 2000;43:319‐323.
3. Mlynarik V,
Gambarota G, Frenkel H, Gruetter R. Magn Reson Med. 2006;56:965‐970.