Reyhaneh Nosrati1,2, Mukund Balasubramanian1,2, and Robert Mulkern1,2
1Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States, 2Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
Synopsis
Several
studies have reported strong correlations between transverse relaxation rate (R2)
of the brain metabolites and neurological/psychiatric diseases. Typically, R2
quantification requires several PRESS acquisitions at different
echo-times leading to long scan times. Here, we evaluated the feasibility of a
novel technique based on a single-echo PRESS acquisition with full echo
sampling for R2 estimation of major brain metabolites (NAA, Cr and
Cho) and compared those to the values obtained using five PRESS acquisitions. The
proposed method allowed for R2 estimation with 87.7±6.8%
accuracy compared to the multiple PRESS acquisitions representing a five-fold decrease
in acquisition time in this case.
Purpose
To compare transverse relaxation rates of brain
metabolites estimated from single-echo PRESS acquisitions with multiple PRESS
acquisitions at different echo times.Introduction
Brain
metabolite transverse relaxation rates R2 are highly sensitive to molecular
motion mainly through interaction of metabolites with macromolecules. Significant
changes in metabolite relaxation rates have been reported in several brain pathologies
including Alzheimers1,
bipolar disorder2,
stroke3 and
schizophrenia2,4 and
have been shown to be affected by the aging process2,5. In
addition, metabolite R2 measurements allow for T2-corrected
metabolite concentrations6. Tissue
metabolite relaxometry is commonly based on multiple PRESS acquisitions at
different echo times resulting in long scan times. In this study, we evaluated
the feasibility of using a single-echo PRESS acquisition with full echo
sampling7 for
brain metabolite R2 estimations and compared them with conventional
R2Hahn values obtained from multiple PRESS acquisitions. Methods
Three
healthy adult subjects, having given informed consent, were scanned on a 3T Siemens Trio scanner using a 32-channel
head coil. One subject was scanned twice with ~2yr interval (subject A/A’). Single
voxel (2×2×2cm3) water-suppressed PRESS data were acquired with five different echo
times (TE’s) of 30, 144, 288, 360 and 432ms with a 3 s TR and with 48 or 96
signal averages. To test the methodology in a high SNR regime, similar data
acquisition but without water suppression was performed on water phantoms with
gadolinium concentrations ranging from 0.21 to 0.83 mM.
For
the single-echo R2 estimation, the TE = 288 ms data was used; the full echo (right and left side of
TE) was sampled with spectral data acquisition beginning shortly after
the last refocusing pulse yielding approximately 130 ms of data on the left side
of the echo center and 512 ms on the right side. Magnitude-mode spectra from the
Fourier transform (FT) of the full echo data (left-side + right-side), and
magnitude-mode spectra from the FT of right-side-only data were used to
calculate a ratio, β,
of peak heights for each metabolite:
$$ \beta= \frac{\text{peak height of the FT of the full echo}}{ \text{peak height of the FT of the right side only}} $$
R2
values were then evaluated using the transcendental equation7,8:
$$\beta=1+ \frac{R_2^*(1-e^{-(R_2^*-2R_{2})(\tau_{2}-\tau_{1})})}{R_2^*-2R_{2}} $$
where
$$$\tau_{1}=0.007s$$$ is the delay between the first two RF pulses and $$$\tau_{2}=0.144s$$$ is the delay between the last two RF pulses. To calculate R2 *,
Lorentzian
fits of absorption-mode spectra from the FT of the right-side-only time domain
data were used to measure full-widths-at-half maxima (FWHM) and R2* values were estimated as πFWHM. Fig.1d
shows β plotted
as a function of R2 for the NAA resonance of subject A’ (R2*= 18.2s-1)
which was used to estimate the corresponding R2 value from the measured β.
As shown in Fig. 2, R2Hahn
values were estimated using mono-exponential fits to the peak areas extracted
from Lorentzian fits to the right side absorption mode spectra vs TE to serve as "gold standard" for single echo R2 comparison.
Results
Fig.1 shows representative R2
estimation pipeline for subject A’ which includes location of the voxel for
spectra acquisition (periventricular white matter tracts), fully sampled time domain signal (right and left side), magnitude
mode spectra of the full echo (right and left) and right side only along with
the corresponding β vs. R2 curve for one example.
The β and
R2* pairs that were used to extract R2 values from single
echo acquisition (TE = 288 ms) data in all subjects are provided in Table 1. The
mean ± SD R2 values from all subjects for NAA, Cr and Cho evaluated
from these pairs were 3.8 ± 1.5 s-1, 6.6 ± 1.4 s-1 and
4.3 ±0.8 s-1, respectively, and compared favourably with the corresponding
R2Hahn values of 4.0 ± 0.6 s-1, 6.5 ± 0.4 s-1
and 4.8 ± 0.4 s-1.
Fig. 3
demonstrates the correlation plots of R2Hahn vs R2 values
extracted from the β and R2* pairs for gadolinium-doped water phantoms as well as all subjects. Linear
fits to phantom (Fig. 3a) and all subject (Fig. 3b) data yielded slopes of 1.0 (R2
= 0.97) and 1.2 (R2 = 0.84) respectively.Discussion
Spectroscopic
measurements of brain metabolite R2 values are challenging due to
low SNR and so generally require long scan times which can be difficult
to accommodate particularly in very sick children where such measurements may
prove useful2,6. In
this work, we applied our recently proposed method for R2 estimation7,8
using a single-echo PRESS acquisition and provided reasonably accurate (with respect to
R2Hahn) estimation of R2 under both high SNR regime in phantoms
(92±8% accuracy) as well as low SNR brain
metabolite (88±7% accuracy) in five times less scan time than that
used for the R2Hahn measurements. The precision of the single-echo
method relies on a reliable measurement of β, which is more challenging in the low SNR regime of metabolite spectroscopy than in high SNR regime of gadolinium-doped water phantoms. Further work to
identify optimal full echo sampling parameters, including TE and the number of
signal averages, remains to be done. However, the preliminary results of this
study suggest that single-TE brain metabolite relaxometry is quite feasible and
may have the potential to replace multiple PRESS acquisitions with different
TE’s. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Dumoulin
M, Zimmerman E, Hurd R, Hancu I. Increased brain metabolite T2 relaxation times
in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. In: Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med.
; 2005.
2. Ongür D,
Prescot AP, Jensen JE, et al. T2 relaxation time abnormalities in bipolar
disorder and schizophrenia. Magn Reson Med. 2010;63(1):1-8.
doi:10.1002/mrm.22148
3. Walker PM, Ben
Salem D, Lalande A, Giroud M, Brunotte F. Time course of NAA T2 and ADC(w) in
ischaemic stroke patients: 1H MRS imaging and diffusion-weighted MRI. J
Neurol Sci. 2004;220(1-2):23-28. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2004.01.012
4. Du F, Cooper
A, Cohen BM, Renshaw PF, Öngür D. Water and metabolite transverse T2 relaxation
time abnormalities in the white matter in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res.
2012;137(1-3):241-245. doi:10.1016/j.schres.2012.01.026
5. Kirov II,
Fleysher L, Fleysher R, Patil V, Liu S, Gonen O. Age dependence of regional
proton metabolites T2 relaxation times in the human brain at 3 T. Magn Reson
Med. 2008;60(4):790-795. doi:10.1002/mrm.21715
6. Baker EH,
Levin SW, Zhang Z, Mukherjee AB. Evaluation of disease progression in INCL by
MR spectroscopy. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2015;2(8):797-809.
doi:10.1002/acn3.222
7. Mulkern R V,
Balasubramanian M. Spectroscopic sampling of the left side of long-TE spin
echoes: a free lunch? MAGMA. 2018;31(2):321-340.
doi:10.1007/s10334-017-0647-7
8. Mulkern R V,
Balasubramanian M. On spectrally selective measurements of irreversible and
reversible transverse relaxation rates from single voxel, single echo time
PRESS acquisitions. In: Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 26. ;
2018:1344.