Kimberly Chan1, Theresia Ziegs2, and Anke Henning1,2
1Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States, 2Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tuebingen, Germany
Synopsis
It has been shown that neural networks combined
with variable k-space undersampling (MultiNet GRAPPA) is superior to a
conventional GRAPPA reconstruction at 9.4T.
Here, the feasibility of performing MultiNet GRAPPA for 1H
FID-MRSI at 7T is investigated with and without novel modifications to the
original acquisition/reconstruction scheme.
In this study, it is shown that MultiNet GRAPPA is shown to be feasible for
1H MRSI acceleration at 7T with a new k-space undersampling scheme for
higher signal-to-noise and increased map reliability and use of a novel technique
to increase SNR retention using semi-synthetic calibration data without an
increase in acquisition time.
Purpose
MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) can map metabolite distributions,
but suffers from long acquisition times.
To address this, acceleration techniques, like GRAPPA, have been applied
to decrease acquisition times (1-3). It
was recently proposed to improve upon the conventional GRAPPA reconstruction using
multiple neural networks for MRSI reconstruction combined with variable k-space
undersampling (MultiNet GRAPPA) (3).
This approach was shown to be superior to a conventional 1H
FID MRSI GRAPPA reconstruction at 9.4T. Here,
the feasibility of performing MultiNet GRAPPA for 1H FID-MRSI at 7T
is investigated with and without several novel modifications to the original
acquisition/reconstruction scheme. In
particular, we present (1) a new k-space undersampling scheme of 3.6x for higher
signal-to-noise and increased map reliability and (2) a technique to increase
SNR retention using semi-synthetic calibration data without an increase in
acquisition time.Methods
Figure 1a shows the k-space undersampling masks
resulting in 6x, 7.3x, and 3.6x acceleration.
Figure 1b shows a schematic of the method to artificially bolster the
amount of training data. A Gaussian
probability distribution is fit to the noise distribution in each coil taken
from an anatomical image, randomly sampled, added to each voxel in the
individual coil images, and inverse Fourier transformed back into k-space. This is repeated multiple times to form several
semi-synthetic averages and used to train the neural networks that facilitate
the GRAPPA reconstruction by predicting missing k-space points.
Elliptically-sampled
MRSI data were acquired in 3 healthy adults (2 male, age: 44.7 ± 14.7) on a Philips
Achieva 7T scanner with a 32-channel receive head coil (Nova Medical). A 1H FID-MRSI sequence without lipid
suppression (4, 5) was used as well as an optimized water suppression scheme (5). Data were acquired with a flip angle=32°, TR=300 ms, TE=1.02
ms, spectral bandwidth=4000 Hz, and 512 spectral points for a total acquisition
time of 16 minutes. One dataset was
acquired with a field-of-view of 192x192 mm2 at the level of the
corpus callosum, while the other datasets were acquired with a field-of-view of
200x200 mm2 right above the level of the corpus callosum. All datasets had a slice thickness of 12 mm
and used a 64x64 phase encoding matrix. A high resolution anatomical image at 4x4
times the resolution of the MRSI data was also acquired at the same slice
position with the same dimensions as the MRSI data. A T1-FFE sequence was used with a flip angle=80°, a TR=37 ms, and a TE=4 ms.
The
elliptically-sampled 1H-MRSI data was retrospectively undersampled which
resulted in effective scan times of 4.4, 2.7, and 2.2 minutes for 3.6x, 6x, and
7.3x acceleration respectively. Data
were reconstructed using MultiNet with two separate neural networks trained with
200 hidden layers for each level of undersampling. This resulted in 4 neural networks: 2-voxel
cross-neighbor and 2-voxel adjacent-neighbor to fill the outermost k-space
region and 1-voxel cross-neighbor, and 1-voxel adjacent neighbor to fill up to
the fully-sampled center k-space region.
For retrospective lipid removal, L1 regularization was
applied to the reconstructed data (6). The
performance of MultiNet GRAPPA was evaluated with several quantitative metrics:
the signal-to-noise (SNR), structural similarity index (SSIM) (3) of the
metabolite maps to the elliptically-sampled data, and Cramer-Rao Lower Bounds
(CRLBs) of LCModel fits to the data. SNR
was calculated as the ratio between the NAA peak over the root-mean-square of
the noise from 10-12 ppm.Results
In
all subjects, the SNR increases with the number of semi-synthetic anatomical
averages used to train the neural network (Figure 2). In addition, the 3.6x accelerated data
retains ~30% more SNR than the other accelerated data. The spectra reconstructed with 16 semi-synthetic
averages retained 50.5% ± 15% more SNR than the spectra reconstructed with the
center of k-space from one anatomical average as was originally proposed (3). This can be seen visually in figure 3 where
the spectra reconstructed with 16 semi-synthetic anatomical averages are less
noisy. These spectra are also visually
similar to the spectra reconstructed from the fully-sampled data. Figure 4 shows metabolite maps for 3 major
metabolites referenced to water. Visually,
the maps reconstructed with 16 semi-synthetic averages are more similar to the maps
generated from the fully-sampled dataset.
In addition, the SSIM of the accelerated metabolite maps to the
fully-sampled metabolite maps increases with more semi-synthetic training
averages.Discussion
MultiNet
GRAPPA is shown to be feasible for 1H MRSI acceleration at 7T with a new k-space undersampling scheme for 3.6x acceleration and semi-synthetic anatomical averages to improve neural network training. Furthermore,
this method is simple to implement and doesn’t require additional hardware or
software.
The use of more semi-synthetic anatomical
calibration data allows for improved neural network training, and consequently
more accurate GRAPPA reconstructions. This
results in improved SNR retention, and consequently, increased metabolite map
similarity to the fully-sampled metabolite maps. While it is possible to instead acquire more
anatomical data, this would result in increased acquisition times. For 16 averages, this would increase the
acquisition time of the anatomical data from 10 seconds to 2.7 minutes. In addition, averages acquired in real time
would be sensitive to head motion which would result in the neural networks
learning motion between averages and therefore, less accurate GRAPPA
reconstructions.Acknowledgements
This work was funded by
the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) (Grant Number:
RR180056) and European Union (Horizon2020, CDS-QUAMRI, Grant Number: 634541).References
1.
Hangel et al.,
NMR in Biomed 2015
2.
Moser et al.,
Magn. Reson. Med 2019
3.
Nassirpour et
al. NeuroImage 2018
4.
Henning et al,
NMR in Biomed 2009
5.
Nassirpour et
al. NeuroImage 2016
6. Bilgic et al. Magn. Reson. Med 2013