Hyungseok Jang1, Yajun Ma1, Michael Carl2, Saeed Jerban1, Eric Chang1,3, and Jiang Du1
1University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States, 2GE Healthcare, La Jolla, CA, United States, 3VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, United States
Synopsis
Cartilage has a complex structure comprised of
multiple zones with different MR signal properties. Among them, osteochondral junction (OCJ) cannot be directly imaged with conventional MR
imaging techniques. In this study, we explore the feasibility of inversion
recovery prepared fat-saturated zero echo time (IR-FS-ZTE) to image the human
knee OCJ. To accentuate the signal from the OCJ region with
short T2*, adiabatic inversion recovery along with fat-saturation preparation
was applied, followed by continous, slient ZTE imaging. The feasibility and
efficacy of IR-FS-ZTE were shown in ex vivo cadaveric human knee joints and in
in vivo healthy volunteers.
Introduction
Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common joint
disease, afflicting ~30 million people in the US alone1. Degeneration of articular cartilage usually
accompanies OA, making it a common indicator for diagnosis and prognosis of the
disease. Cartilage has a complex structure comprised of multiple zones:
superficial, intermediate, deep, and calcified layer. Osteochondral junction (OCJ)
is the region where calcified cartilage meets subchondral bone. Recently, it has
been shown that inversion recovery (IR) prepared ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging
can directly resolve the short T2* signal from the OCJ region2. In this study, we explore the feasibility and
efficacy of IR prepared fat saturated zero echo time (IR-FS-ZTE) for imaging the
OCJ region in a human knee.Methods
Figure 1-A illustrates a typical
inversion recovery curve in the different cartilage layers and subchondral bone.
Due to the short T2* (<1ms), the longitudinal magnetization in calcified
layer and subchondral bone is not inverted, but partially saturated, by the
relatively long adiabatic inversion pulse (~10 ms). By selecting TI tuned to
the nulling point of the superficial/intermediate layer, the signal from OCJ
region can be accentuated, allowing improved image contrast and dynamic range
for the short T2 component. Figure 1-B shows a pulse sequence for the signal
preparation, where an adiabatic inversion recovery is followed by fat saturation
to suppress signal from tissues in the superficial/intermediate layer and marrow
fat simultaneously. Then, silent ZTE imaging is performed immediately after the
fat-saturation pulse, where multiple spokes are continuously acquired with smoothly rotating
readout gradient, as shown in Figure 1-C. Unfortunately, ZTE encoding inevitably
leaves a hole of missing data in the encoded k-space due to the RF coil
deadtime (a blind time during RF transit/receive mode switching). In this
study, the hole was filled with additional encoding with a reduced readout
bandwidth (BW), as in Water- and Fat-suppressed Proton Projection MRI
(WASPI)3, as illustrated with blue dots in
Figure 1-D.
The 3D IR-FS-ZTE sequence was
implemented on a 3T clinical scanner (MR750, GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA) and
evaluated with three cadaveric human knee joints (81F, 61M, and 57M donors) and
three healthy volunteers (28M, 35M, and 36M) using an 8-channel transmit/receive knee coil (GE
Healthcare). MR imaging parameters were as follows: 1) IR-FS-ZTE: an adiabatic inversion
pulse (GE Silver-Hoult pulse with width of 8.64ms and BW of 1.5kHz); a GE
standard fat-saturation pulse; a 24μs hard pulse; flip angle=8o;
readout BW=62.5kHz; FOV=13x13x8cm3; matrix=256x256x40 (ex vivo) or 220x220x40
(in vivo); TR/TE=1200ms/12μs; TI=200, 300, 420, 520, and 700ms (ex vivo) or
580ms (in vivo); RF-to-RF timing=2.3ms (ex vivo) or 1.9ms (in vivo); number of spokes
per IR=24 (ex vivo) or 36 (in vivo); and scan time=25min 20sec (ex vivo) or
9min 58sec (in vivo); 2) FS-ZTE: no IR preparation, other parameters matched
with IR-FS-ZTE, scan time = 1min 41sec; 3) PDw-FSE: FOV=15×15cm2, matrix=352×256,
TR/TE=3220ms/27.8ms, number of slices=40, acceleration factor=2, and scan
time=2min 30sec; 4) T2w-FSE: FOV=15×15cm2, matrix=352×256, TR/TE=7585/71.5
ms, number of slices=40, acceleration factor=2, scan time=2min 32sec.
All MR images were reconstructed using
online reconstruction based on GE Orchestra SDK v1.7.1. The following gridding
parameters were used: alpha=2 and kernel width=3 data points. Density function
was analytically calculated based on the inter-spoke distance and intra-spoke
sampling density. The low resolution k-space data acquired using WASPI were
combined with high resolution data using a linear merging filter with width of
2 data points. The reconstructed images in each RF receiver channel were
combined using weighted sum of squares method, in which the weighting factors were
calculated based on the noise power in each channel.Results
Figure 2 shows the IR-FS-ZTE images from a
representative ex vivo knee sample (from an 81-year-old female donor) acquired
with the five different TIs (200, 300, 420, 520, and 700ms) and the FS-ZTE
image as a comparison. The IR-FS-ZTE with TI=520ms showed the best contrast for
the OCJ region. Compared to the FS-ZTE, the IR-FS-ZTE clearly revealed the
morphology in the OCJ region (red arrows) and the degenerated lesion (green
arrows). Figure 3 shows the IR-FS-ZTE images from a representative healthy
volunteer (35-year-old male). In the clinical sequences, the signal from the
OCJ region is invisible due to the short T2 decay (green arrows). The proposed
IR-FS-ZTE shows the high signal intensity from the OCJ region owing to the adiabatic
IR preparation, fat saturation, and near-zero TE (red arrows).Discussion and Conclusion
In this study, we developed and evaluated the
feasibility of IR-FS-ZTE MR sequence for imaging of the OCJ region. In the ex vivo and in vivo experiments, the
proposed IR-FS-ZTE showed highly specific morphological imaging of the OCJ
region. Potentially, the proposed IR-FS-ZTE can be
advantageous over other IR-FS-UTE techniques in terms of faster encoding for
the signal with extremely short T2* due to the near-zero nominal TE (12μs) and
shorter effective TE due to the constant gradient encoding (no need for ramping
up gradients). Moreover, the reduced acoustic noise compared with other UTE
sequences could be beneficial for patient comfort4. However, ZTE is limited in FA and readout BW5. In future studies, we will systematically compare
ZTE with other UTE techniques2,6–8 in phantoms, ex vivo samples, and in vivo subjects.Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge grant support from NIH
(R01AR075825, 2R01AR062581, 1R01 AR068987), Veterans Affairs (Merit Awards
1I01RX002604), and GE Healthcare.References
1. Lawrence RC, Felson DT, Helmick CG, et al. Estimates of
the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United
States: Part II. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:26–35.
2. Ma Y, Jerban S, Carl
M, et al. Imaging of the region of the osteochondral junction (OCJ) using a 3D
adiabatic inversion recovery prepared ultrashort echo time cones (3D
IR‐UTE‐cones) sequence at 3 T. NMR Biomed. 2019;32:e4080.
3. Wu Y, Dai G,
Ackerman JL, et al. Water- and fat-suppressed proton projection MRI (WASPI) of
rat femur bone. Magn. Reson. Med. 2007;57:554–567.
4. Weiger M, Brunner
DO, Dietrich BE, Müller CF, Pruessmann KP. ZTE imaging in humans. Magn. Reson.
Med. 2013;70:328–332.
5. Cheng Li, Magland
JF, Seifert AC, Wehrli FW. Correction of Excitation Profile in Zero Echo Time
(ZTE) Imaging Using Quadratic Phase-Modulated RF Pulse Excitation and Iterative
Reconstruction. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 2014;33:961–969.
6. Jang H, Ma Y,
Searleman AC, et al. Inversion recovery UTE based volumetric myelin imaging in
human brain using interleaved hybrid encoding. Magn. Reson. Med. 2019:mrm.27986
doi: 10.1002/mrm.27986.
7. Jang H, Lu X, Carl
M, et al. True phase quantitative susceptibility mapping using continuous
single‐point imaging: a
feasibility study. Magn. Reson. Med. 2019;81:1907–1914.
8. Lee YH, Suh JS,
Grodzki D. Ultrashort echo (UTE) versus pointwise encoding time reduction with
radial acquisition (PETRA) sequences at 3 Tesla for knee meniscus: A
comparative study. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;34:75–80.