Martin Krämer1, Marta B Maggioni1, and Jürgen R Reichenbach1
1Medical Physics Group, Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Jena University Hospital - Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany
Synopsis
Segmentation
of tendons based on MRI data is challenging because of their very
short transverse relaxation times and typically curved structure as
well as small diameter. In this work, we performed combined T2*
and T1
mapping using multi-echo and variable flip angle ultra-short
echo-time imaging. Based on the resulting relaxation parameter maps,
bivariate histograms were calculated which showed distinct clusters
that could be ascribed to various tissues. Ranges for both relaxation
parameters were defined using these histograms and applied to
volumetrically segment and subsequently visualize the patellar and
quadriceps tendon.
Introduction
With
recent advances and improved availability of ultra-short echo-time
(UTE) imaging sequences1,
musculoskeletal MRI is increasingly focusing on imaging of tendons.
In particular, the quantification of relaxation parameters holds a
high potential for the characterization of various diseases, such as
tendinopathy, as well as the general condition of tendons2,3.
One major challenge, however, is the segmentation and visualization
of tendons, because they can be small compared to other tissues and
can have curved structures. Segmentation of tendons is made even more
difficult by the fact that UTE images typically show very little
contrast between tissues due to the very short echo-times. In this
work, we present an automated segmentation approach of the patellar
and quadriceps tendons based on bivariate histograms of
volumetrically measured T2*
and T1
relaxation times.Methods
Data
acquisition was performed using a 3D radial center-out UTE sequence
with short hard-pulse excitation1.
For T2*
estimation, corresponding power images from a monopolar multi-echo
readout with echo-times (TE) of 0.10ms, 2.48ms, and 4.90ms were fitted
voxel-wise using a squared exponential function that included an
additional offset parameter to account for potential noise bias4.
T1
relaxation times were estimated from a variable flip angle
acquisition using five flip angles of 5°,12°,20°,30°, and 38° and
by performing a two-parameter fit to the fast low-angle shot (FLASH)
gradient-echo signal equation3.
Other acquisition parameters were: 80×61×50 matrix,
(160×123×100)mm³ field of view, (2.0×2.0×2.0)mm³ isotropic
spatial resolution, 20ms repetition-time and a 125kHz readout
bandwidth. Measurements were performed on five volunteers, aged
between 24 and 50 years old, without known pathologies on a 3T
whole-body MRI scanner (Magnetom PRISMA, Siemens Healthineers) using
a 16-channel NORAS Variety flex coil (NORAS MRI products GmbH).
Images were reconstructed offline with MATLAB using re-gridding with
iterative sampling density compensation and an optimized kernel5.
Prior
to further processing, the reconstructed 3D relaxation parameter maps
were masked to exclude contributions from noise regions outside the
knee. To calculate the bivariate histograms, the T1
and T2*
relaxation times of all voxels were binned into equally sized bins.
Clearly visible clusters in the histograms were manually outlined by
drawing ROIs around them, and subsequently visualized using 3D
surface reconstruction. To improve the masks resulting from this
histogram analysis and to remove outliers, a connectivity analysis
was performed prior to visualization, retaining only the largest
connected components of the masks. Since no prominent cluster was
found in the bivariate histogram located in the range of the expected
T1
and T2*
times of the patellar and quadriceps tendons, a ROI was placed in the
histogram encompassing a rectangular region in the ranges of
1.0ms<T2*<3.0ms
and 350ms<T1<900ms. Results
Maps
of the T2*
and T1
relaxation parameters are shown in Figure 1 for a single subject,
demonstrating that both the patellar and quadriceps tendons were
clearly identifiable. Since the longest echo-time was only 4.9 ms,
the values obtained for other tissues with longer T2*
are more uncertain and most likely underestimated.
The
bivariate histogram (Figure 2) revealed several well-delineated
clusters, exhibiting similar relaxation parameters in the range of
150ms<T1<450ms
and 3ms<T2*<7ms.
Also visible is a broader cluster in the range of 800ms<T1<1500ms
and 5ms<T2*<11ms.
By separating and masking the bivariate histogram, the tissue types
underlying the clusters became evident as shown in Figure 3. The
narrow and sharp clusters between 150ms< T1<450ms
and 3ms<T2*< 7ms
mainly reflect bone marrow (Figure 3, blue) as well as fat and skin
(Figure 3, green), while the broader cluster with higher T1
values (Figure 3, yellow) can be attributed to muscle tissue. By
placing an ROI in the range of 1.0ms<T2*<3.0ms
and 350ms<T1<900ms
in the bivariate histogram, the patellar and quadriceps tendons could
also be extracted (Figure 3, red).
Based
on the segmentation of both tendons (Figure 3, red), a color-coded 3D
volumetric rendering was created to visualize the distributions of T1
and T2*
values over the entire tendon volume (Figure 4), including parts of
the entheses. Inspection of these volumetric renderings indicates
that T1
is not constant over the volume of the tendons, but contains “hot
spots” in some subjects as well as an increase in the relaxation
times towards the entheses.Discussion and Conclusion
Using
bivariate histograms of T2*
and T1
for 3D segmentation of the quadriceps and patellar tendons allowed
for a fully automated approach and required only one-time user
interaction to define the relaxation time bins used for segmentation
of the tendon voxels. Visualizing volumetric relaxation maps holds
the potential for future studies to assess these parameters not only
over manually selected region-of-interests, but across the entire
tendon volume. As demonstrated (Figure 4), T1
within the tendons varies individually, implying that placement and
size of any region-of-interest based analysis highly affects mean
values.
Our
results suggest that a bivariate histogram analysis can also be
applied to other tissues types, such as fat or muscles. For this
purpose, however, acquisition of data with longer echo-times would be
recommendable to avoid underestimation of T2*
and compression of the T2*
bins along the x-axis of the histograms. Additionally, further
optimized and accelerated6,7
protocols for faster T1
mapping would help to reduce the relatively long scan time of
currently 22 minutes or alternatively to increase spatial resolutionAcknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
-
Herrmann
KH, Krämer M, Reichenbach JR. Time
Efficient 3D Radial UTE Sampling with Fully Automatic Delay
Compensation on a Clinical 3T MR Scanner. PLoS One.
2016;Mar14;11(3):e0150371.
-
Ma
Y-J, Lu X, Carl M, et al. Accurate T1 mapping of short T2 tissues
using a three-dimensional ultrashort echo time cones actual flip
angle imaging-variable repetition time (3D UTE-Cones AFI-VTR)
method. Magn Reson Med 2018;80(2):598–608.
-
Krämer
M, Maggioni MB, Brisson NM, et al. T1
and T2*
mapping of the human quadriceps and patellar tendons using
ultra-short echo-time (UTE) imaging and bivariate relaxation
parameter-based volumetric visualization. Magn Reason Imaging.
2019;63:29–36.
-
Henkelman
RM. Measurement of signal intensities in the presence of noise in MR
images: Technical Reports: Signal intensities in MR image noise. Med
Phys. 1985;12(2):232–233.
-
Zwart
NR, Johnson KO, Pipe JG. Efficient sample density estimation by
combining gridding and an optimized kernel. Magn Reason Med.
2012;67(3):701–710.
-
Pruessmann
KP, Weiger M, Börnert P, et al. Advances in sensitivity encoding
with arbitrary k -space trajectories. Magn Reson Med
2001;46(4):638–51.
-
Lustig
M, Donoho D, Pauly JM. Sparse MRI: The application of compressed
sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 2007;58(6):1182–95