2806

Quantitative ultrashort echo time (UTE)-Cones monitoring of tendon healing  after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) surgery
xue yu xie1, puye wu2, and shuang chen3
1radiology, huashan hospital, shanghai, China, 2GE healthcare, beijing, China, 3huashan hospital, shanghai, China

Synopsis

A longitudinal monitoring of the supraspinatus tendon healing during the first year after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) surgery using quantitative ultrashort echo time (UTE)-Cones.

abstract

Objectives To prospectively evaluate the healing process of supraspinatus tendon by using 3D ultrashort echo time (UTE)-Cones during the first year after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) surgery. Methods Twenty-two patients who underwent ARCR were included and performed with quantitative MRI and clinical examinations at serial follow-up timepoints: 3, 6 and 12-month postoperatively. Twenty healthy controls underwent MRI examitations as well. The supraspinatus tendon repair status was assessed according to Sugaya’s classification. Then, the tendon was divided equally into lateral, middle and medial subregions to get T2* values on UTE-Cones images. Results The mean T2* value of lateral region increased from 3-month to 6-month and then decreased at 12-month (P<0.001). Moreover, the T2* value of lateral subregion at 12-month was comparable to that of healthy tendon (P=0.32). While for other subregions, the T2* values showed no significant differences among the three timepoints. The paients achieved satisfactory outcomes at 12-month on basis of clinical scores. The T2* value of lateral subregion correlated strongly with semi-quantitative Sugaya’s classification (r=0.82, P<0.001). No significant correlations were found regarding T2* values and clinical scores (P>0.05). Conclusions The healing process of supraspinatus tendon after ARCR was revealed by the T2* value of lateral subregion which increased at 3-month, peaked at 6-month, and was comparable to healthy tendon at 12-month follow-up. Quantitative 3D UTE-Cones which provided biochemical characteristics of the tendon, could be a powerful method to dynamically monitor the supraspinatus tendon healing after ARCR.

Acknowledgements

Compliance with ethical standards

References

1.Tashjian RZ, Granger EK, Chalmers PN (2018) Healing Rates and Functional Outcomes After Triple-Loaded Single-Row Versus Transosseous-Equivalent Double-Row Rotator Cuff Tendon Repair. Orthop J Sports Med 6:2325967118805365 4

2. Malavolta EA, Assuncao JH, Ramos FF et al (2016) Serial structural MRI evaluation of arthroscopy rotator cuff repair: does Sugaya's classification correlate with the postoperative clinical outcomes? ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY 136:791-797 5

3. Pfalzer F, Huth J, Sturmer E, Endele D, Kniesel B, Mauch F (2017) Serial clinical and MRI examinations after arthroscopic rotator cuff reconstruction using double-row technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:2174-2181 6

4. Khazzam M, Kuhn JE, Mulligan E et al (2012) Magnetic resonance imaging identification of rotator cuff retears after repair: interobserver and intraobserver agreement. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE 40:1722-1727 7

5. Benjamin M, Bydder GM (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging of entheses using ultrashort TE (UTE) pulse sequences. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING 25:381-389 8 Chang EY, Du J, Chung CB (2015) UTE imaging in the musculoskeletal system. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING 41:870-883

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 28 (2020)
2806