xue yu xie1, puye wu2, and shuang chen3
1radiology, huashan hospital, shanghai, China, 2GE healthcare, beijing, China, 3huashan hospital, shanghai, China
Synopsis
A longitudinal monitoring
of the supraspinatus tendon healing during the first year after arthroscopic
rotator cuff repair (ARCR) surgery using quantitative ultrashort echo time (UTE)-Cones.
abstract
Objectives To prospectively evaluate the healing process of supraspinatus
tendon by using 3D ultrashort echo time (UTE)-Cones during the first
year after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) surgery.
Methods Twenty-two
patients who underwent ARCR were included and performed with quantitative MRI and
clinical examinations at serial follow-up timepoints: 3, 6 and 12-month
postoperatively. Twenty healthy controls underwent MRI examitations as well. The
supraspinatus tendon repair status was assessed according to Sugaya’s
classification. Then, the tendon was divided equally into lateral, middle and
medial subregions to get T2* values on UTE-Cones images.
Results The mean T2* value of lateral region increased from
3-month to 6-month and then decreased at 12-month (P<0.001). Moreover,
the T2* value of lateral subregion at 12-month was comparable to that of healthy
tendon (P=0.32). While for other subregions, the T2* values showed no
significant differences among the three timepoints. The paients achieved satisfactory outcomes at 12-month on basis
of clinical scores. The T2* value of
lateral subregion correlated strongly with semi-quantitative Sugaya’s
classification (r=0.82, P<0.001).
No significant correlations were found regarding T2* values and clinical scores
(P>0.05).
Conclusions The healing
process of supraspinatus tendon after ARCR was revealed by the T2* value of
lateral subregion which increased at 3-month, peaked at 6-month, and was
comparable to healthy tendon at 12-month follow-up. Quantitative 3D
UTE-Cones which provided biochemical characteristics of the tendon, could be a
powerful method to dynamically monitor the supraspinatus tendon healing after
ARCR.Acknowledgements
Compliance with ethical standardsReferences
1.Tashjian RZ, Granger EK, Chalmers PN (2018) Healing Rates and Functional
Outcomes After Triple-Loaded Single-Row Versus Transosseous-Equivalent
Double-Row Rotator Cuff Tendon Repair. Orthop J Sports Med 6:2325967118805365
4
2. Malavolta EA, Assuncao JH,
Ramos FF et al (2016) Serial structural MRI evaluation of arthroscopy rotator
cuff repair: does Sugaya's classification correlate with the postoperative
clinical outcomes? ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY 136:791-797
5
3. Pfalzer F, Huth J, Sturmer
E, Endele D, Kniesel B, Mauch F (2017) Serial clinical and MRI examinations
after arthroscopic rotator cuff reconstruction using double-row technique. Knee
Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:2174-2181
6
4. Khazzam M, Kuhn JE,
Mulligan E et al (2012) Magnetic resonance imaging identification of rotator
cuff retears after repair: interobserver and intraobserver agreement. AMERICAN
JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE 40:1722-1727
7
5. Benjamin M, Bydder GM
(2007) Magnetic resonance imaging of entheses using ultrashort TE (UTE) pulse
sequences. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING 25:381-389
8 Chang EY, Du J, Chung CB
(2015) UTE imaging in the musculoskeletal system. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE
IMAGING 41:870-883