Bernd A Jung1, Onur Afacan2, Till Lerch1, Young-Jo Kim3, Tobias Kober4,5,6, Michael Ith1, Markus Klarhoefer7, and Florian Schmaranzer1
1Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland, 2Dept of Radiology, Boston Children`s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States, 3Dept of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston Children`s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States, 4Advanced Clinical Imaging Technology, Siemens Healthcare, Lausanne, Switzerland, 5Dept of Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, 6LTS5, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland, 7Siemens Healthcare, Zuerich, Switzerland
Synopsis
Although commonly used for T1 mapping of hip cartilage, 3D dual flip
angle (DFA) techniques are sensitive to flip angle variations related to B1
inhomogeneities. Therefore, the IR-based MP2RAGE technique was compared with a
standard 3D DFA acquisition including B1 field mapping for T1
mapping of hip cartilage in a phantom study and in healthy volunteers at 3T.
For the phantom study, a 2D IR-based sequence was additionally acquired to provide
reference T1 maps. MP2RAGE resulted in more accurate T1 values with less
regional variations compared to DFA method and therefore enables a more robust
T1 mapping of hip cartilage.
Introduction
Due to the advent of femoroacetabular impingement and the almost
exponential rise in joint-preserving procedures performed over the last 15
years, there has been an increasing desire to improve surgical decision in
patients eligible for hip preservation surgery1. Reliable prognostic
tools to identify those patients who benefit most from surgical intervention
are needed2. While standard morphologic imaging has proven to be
efficient in diagnosing labrum tears3, the evaluation of early cartilage
damage has been elusive4. Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of
cartilage (dGEMRIC) as a biomarker for cartilage quality has been frequently
used in clinical studies5,6 to study cartilage quality in early degenerative
hip disease. Currently, the standard technique for post-contrast T1 mapping of
hip cartilage is based on a 3D dual-flip-angle (DFA) gradient echo based method7.
However, this technique is susceptible to B1-related flip angle
variations increasing at higher B08. More recently, the
magnetization-prepared 2 rapid gradient echo (MP2RAGE)
sequence was introduced to obtain 3D T1 maps with minimized effect of B1 inhomogeneity
even at higher B09. In this study we compared the 3D MP2RAGE
technique and the standard 3D DFA acquisition against a 2D IR technique in
phantoms with varying T1 values. Additionally, we assessed the variability in
pre-contrast T1 of cartilage and periarticular muscles of MP2RAGE in comparison
to the DFA method in healthy volunteers.Methods
All
measurements were performed at 3T (MAGNETOM Skyra, Siemens Healthcare, Germany)
with a 15-channel knee coil. 3D DFA, a prototype 3D MP2RAGE, and 2D single-slice fast spin echo IR (as a reference for T1 values) sequences
were acquired in a phantom study. Eleven phantoms with different concentrations
of Gd-DTPA (Magnevist, Berlex Laboratories, New Jersey,
USA) ranging from 0.14 to 1 mM have been used to obtain a range of T1 values. A
B1-mapping sequence was acquired to assess a potential correlation
between B1 variations and variations of the DFA and the MP2RAGE T1
values from the reference 2D IR T1 values. ROIs were placed for each phantom to
measure T1 for the DFA, MP2RAGE, and 2D IR methods as well as B1
variations.
18 asymptomatic hips in 9 volunteers (27±2 years) underwent
non-contrast, quantitative T1 imaging with the acquisition of axial-oblique MP2RAGE
and DFA (including a prescan for B1 correction) images. To optimize the accuracy of T1
measurements within a range of expected cartilage pre- and post-contrast T1-values between 400 and 1100
ms, the inversion times and flip angle values for both MP2RAGE images were
determined according to the simulations as described by Marques9. To reduce acquisition time, the in-plane phase-encoding
direction was switched to the inner loop of the gradient echo block, and the
slice-encoding including partial Fourier was set to the outer loop. Sequence
parameters are summarized in Fig.1.
For
radial reformatting of 3D images the greater trochanter serves as landmark for the
12 o’clock position. ROIs at clock-face positions 1 o’clock–5 o’clock, 12
o’clock–7 o’clock were clustered as mean anterior and posterior cartilage
regions. For measurement of periarticular muscle T1 manually placed regions of interest
of comparable size in the satorius- and gluteus maximus muscles
(antero-posterior) and the internal obturator- and the vastus lateralis muscle
(medio-lateral) (see Fig.2).Results
The
phantom study is summarized in Fig.3. T1 values over Gd concentration in 11
phantoms reveals excellent agreement for MP2RAGE and 2D IR techniques, whereas
DFA shows clear discrepancies compared to 2D IR (3A). Mean differences for the
DFA- and the MP2RAGE technique compared against the 2D IR technique were 253±85
and 3±11 ms (3B). The Bland-Altman analysis showed a strong tendency of increasing
T1 deviation of the DFA technique relative to the 2D IR technique with
increasing T1 relaxation of the phantoms. Mean B1 variation was 21.1±4.2%
(15.2%–28.8%). The discrepancy in T1 relaxation between the DFA- and the 2D IR
technique increased strongly with increasing B1 variation (3C). By contrast, no
such tendency was observed for MP2RAGE (3D).
The
volunteer study is summarized in Fig.4. Mean T1 values (range of means, 1434–1542
ms) of overall-, anterior and posterior cartilage were consistently higher (all
p<0.001) for the DFA technique compared to the MP2RAGE technique with mean
values ranging from 1028 to 1036 ms, respectively (4A). Regional difference
between mean anterior and posterior cartilage T1 was observed for the DFA
technique (106±163 ms, 95%-CI 32–185 ms, p=0.008). No such difference was
observed for the MP2RAGE technique (4B). Mean T1 values (1279 to 1686 ms) of
periarticular muscles were consistently higher (all p<0.001) for the DFA
technique compared to MP2RAGE (1137 to 1179 ms).Discussion
Despite the used B1 prescan, inter-individual differences in
T1 values of cartilage were greater with the DFA method compared to the MP2RAGE
due to the greater flip-angle variations at 3T. The results supports the
initial hypothesis that an IR-based acquisition of 3D T1 maps of hip cartilage using
the MP2RAGE would be more robust than the B1-sensitive variable-flip-angle
technique at 3T. Future studies should use intravenous or intra-articular
contrast injection and compare post-contrast T1 relaxation of hip cartilage
against a 2D IR T1 reference in patients with hip pain and different stages of
radiographic joint degeneration.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Sutter R, Pfirrmann CWA: Update on Femoroacetabular
Impingement: What Is New, and How Should We Assess It? Semin Musculoskelet
Radiol 2017; 21:518–528.
2. Hanke MS, Steppacher SD, Anwander H, et al. What
MRI Findings Predict Failure 10 Years After Surgery for Femoroacetabular
Impingement? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475:1192–1207
3. Sutter R, Zubler V, Hoffmann A, et al.: Hip MRI:
how useful is intraarticular contrast material for evaluating surgically proven
lesions of the labrum and articular cartilage? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;
202:160–169.
4. Blankenbaker DG, Ullrick SR, Kijowski R, et al.: MR
arthrography of the hip: comparison of IDEAL-SPGR volume sequence to standard
MR sequences in the detection and grading of cartilage lesions. Radiology
2011; 261:863–871.
5. Schmaranzer F, Haefeli P, Hanke M, et al.: How does
the dGEMRIC index change after surgical treatment for FAI? A prospective
controlled study: Preliminary results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475:1080–1099.
6. Palmer A, Fernquest S, Rombach I, et al.:
Diagnostic and prognostic value of delayed Gadolinium Enhanced Magnetic
Resonance Imaging of Cartilage (dGEMRIC) in early osteoarthritis of the hip. Osteoarthr
Cartil 2017; 25:1468–1477.
7. Sur S, Mamisch TC, Hughes T, Kim Y-J: High
resolution fast T1 mapping technique for dGEMRIC. J Magn Reson Imaging
2009; 30:896–900.
8. Siversson C, Chan J, Tiderius C-J, et al.: Effects
of B1 inhomogeneity correction for three-dimensional variable flip angle T1
measurements in hip dGEMRIC at 3 T and 1.5 T. Magn Reson Med 2012;
67:1776–1781.
9.
Marques JP, Kober T, Krueger G, et al. MP2RAGE, a self bias-field
corrected sequence for improved segmentation and T1-mapping at high field. Neuroimage
2010; 49:1271–1281.