Martin Schwartz1,2, Petros Martirosian1, Günter Steidle1, Thomas Küstner1,2,3, Bin Yang2, Alto Stemmer4, Thorsten Feiweier4, Ludger Schöls5,6, Matthis Synofzik5,6, and Fritz Schick1
1Section on Experimental Radiology, University Hospital of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany, 2Institute of Signal Processing and System Theory, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany, 3School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom, 4Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany, 5Department Neurodegenerative Diseases, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Tübingen & Center for Neurology, Tuebingen, Germany, 6German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Tuebingen, Germany
Synopsis
Quantification of spontaneous mechanical activities in musculature like fibrillations
or fasciculations is of high interest for the assessment of neuro-muscular
function in normal and impaired subjects. The diagnostic assessment of
neuromuscular disease focuses at specific muscular regions, and the measurement
protocol was optimized in order to robustly quantify spontaneous activities in
these areas. This work shows preliminary results regarding activity patterns of
healthy and diseased subjects.
Introduction
Spontaneous mechanical activities of human
resting musculature (SMAM)1 can be assessed by diffusion-weighted
imaging (DWI) in MRI. Quantification and detection of these small muscular
movements is of high interest for diagnostic assessment in patients with
neuromuscular disease (NMD).2 Previous works have shown that SMAMs
can be measured in many muscular areas in healthy subjects. However, patients
with neuromuscular disorders might show intensified fasciculations or other
unintended muscular activities in specific muscular regions, e. g. in the
tongue. The ability of the MR sequence to detect spontaneous muscle activity strongly
depends on the selected diffusion-sensitive time.3
The present study investigates the feasibility
of measuring spontaneous activities in specific regions which are important in
the assessment of NMD. In addition, the influence of the diffusion sensitivity
of the MR sequence on the detectability in patients is evaluated. Preliminary
results from four patients are shown.Methods
Diffusion-weighted
measurements were performed in 6 healthy subjects (age: 30±11 years, gender: 6 male)
and four patients with potential neuromuscular disorder (age: 63±9 years,
gender: 3 male, 1 female) on a 3T MR system (MAGNETOM Prismafit,
Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). A prototype diffusion-weighted
stimulated-echo EPI sequence was applied for recording spontaneous muscular
activities under free-breathing conditions.3,4 Protocol parameters
were optimized for the different body regions (Fig. 1A). To enhance patient
comfort and reduce overall scan-time for each participant, relevant body
regions were selected according to the clinical symptoms, e. g. paresis of
lingual musculature, muscle weakness, or motor coordination disorder. Relevant
body regions were: 1) calf musculature at the location of maximum diameter (patients:
P1, P2, P4); 2) shoulder musculature at the region near to the humeral head
(P1, P2, P3); 3) lingual musculature (tongue) centered at the septum (P2, P3). Measurements
of the tongue were recorded in sagittal orientation due to better visualization
as compared to transversal orientation.
Time-series
of motion-sensitive single-shot DWI measurements were co-registered before
further processing since measurements were conducted under free-breathing
conditions. All images were therefore registered by a Local-All-Pass5,6
registration. Spontaneous activities were automatically analyzed by a
pre-trained neural network7 with
the following building blocks: encoder-decoder structure8,9,
residual blocks10, attention-gates11, and prediction smoothing by convolutional long short-term memory
(CLSTM)12,13 blocks (Fig. 1B).
Results were masked by a user-defined region-of-interest to discard
motion-corrupted regions (e.g. tissue
compartments directly at the lung). Furthermore, signal dropouts in the tongue
musculature due to swallowing were manually removed. Activity was analyzed in
terms of the number of SMAM-affected
signal dropouts in DWI and event count maps (ECM: summation of activities
over repetitions).Results & Discussion
Results
of the different muscular regions are given in Fig. 2-4. Image quality at
the shoulder regions is reduced for enlarged diffusion sensitivity Δ due to a shortened
recovery time. For subjects with a high rate of SMAMs, the sensitivity of the
DWI sequence with Δ = 145 ms seemed to be too high, and therefore
small differences in the activation pattern cannot be visualized (Fig. 2B, P2).
Image quality in the region of the tongue can be highly disturbed by dental
treatment which is not uncommon with increased age (Fig. 2, P3). A high rate of
SMAM was measured for P2 in the tongue despite an at least partial paresis and
linguistic disorder (Fig. 2, P2). Clinically reported fasciculations were in
good accordance with the findings in P2 and P3 at the shoulder musculature
(Fig. 3B), both revealing high activation patterns. Rather high activation was
measured in P4 at the calf musculature (Fig. 4) in contrast to P1, P2 as well
as most healthy subjects (P4 suffers from a muscle coordinate disorder).
However, high rates of SMAMs can also be measured in some healthy subjects
(Fig. 4, Healthy #2). Marked inter-individual differences over different body
regions were detected ranging (in an overall percentage of SMAM-affected DWI) in
25±42/13±3/8±9% (calf/shoulder/tongue) for the healthy subgroup and in
47±47/85±21/49±46% for the subgroup with neuromuscular disorders.Conclusion
Quantification
of SMAMs in specific muscular regions might present a novel imaging biomarker
candidate for neuromuscular/neurodegenerative diseases. Based on our findings, DWI
sequences with moderate SMAM-sensitivity should be able to differentiate
activation patterns in subjects with a high rate of spontaneous activities.
Since healthy subjects can also show a high activation pattern in skeletal
musculature, larger studies with patients suffering from
neuromuscular/neurodegenerative disease should be set up to investigate
potential small differences in the activation patterns.Acknowledgements
This work was supported and funded by the German
Research Foundation (DFG) under Grants SCHI 498/11‐1 and YA 28/16‐1.References
[1]: Steidle G,
Schick F. Addressing spontaneous signal voids in repetitive single-shot DWI of
musculature: spatial and temporal patterns in the calves of healthy volunteers
and consideration of unintended muscle activities as underlying mechanism. NMR Biomed 28(7):801-10, 2015.
[2]: Whittaker R,
Porcari P, Braz L, Williams TL, Schofield IS, Blamire A. Functional magnetic
resonance imaging of human motor unit fasciculation in amyotrophic lateral
sclerosis. Annals of Neurology 85(3),
2019.
[3]: Schwartz M,
Steidle G, Martirosian P, Ramos-Murguialday A, Stemmer A, Yang B, Schick F.
Estimation of the Sensitivity Characteristics and Detection Capability of
Diffusion-Weighted MR Sequences in Imaging Spontaneous Mechanical Activity in
Musculature. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting
ISMRM, Honolulu, USA, 2017.
[4]: Schwartz M,
Martirosian P, Küstner T, Steidle G, Feiweier T, Yang B, Schick F. Whole-Body
Mapping of Spontaneous Mechanical Activities in Musculature. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting ISMRM,
Montreal, Canada, 2019.
[5]:
Gilliam C, Küstner T, Blu T. 3D Motion Flow Estimation using Local All-Pass
Filters. Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Biomed.
Imag. (ISBI), Prague, Czech Republic, 2016.
[6]: Küstner
T, Neumann V, Schwartz M, Würslin C, Martirosian P, Gatidis S, Schwenzer NF,
Schick F, Yang B, Schmidt H. An MR Motion Correction toolbox for registration
and evaluation. Proceedings of the Annual
Meeting ISMRM, Singapore, 2016.
[7]:
Schwartz M, Küstner T, Martirosian P, Machann J, Steidle G, Yang B, Schick F.
Robust Quantification of Spontaneous Muscular Activities by Simultaneous
Interpretation of sEMG Data. Proceedings
of the 36th Annual Scientific Meeting ESMRMB, Rotterdam,
Netherlands, 2019.
[8]:
Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical
Image Segmentation. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention
(MICCAI), Munich, Germany, 2015.
[9]: Milletari
F, Navab N, Ahmadi SA. V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for
Volumetric Medical Image Segmentation. arXiv:1606.04797,
2016.
[10]: He K,
Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and
Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, USA, 2016.
[11]: Oktay
O, Schlemper J, Le Folgoc L, Lee M, Heinrich M, Misawa K, Mori K, McDonagh S,
Hammerla NY, Kainz B, Glocker B, Rueckert D. Attention U-Net: Learning Where to
Look for the Pancreas. Conference on
Medical Imaging with Deep Learning (MIDL), Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2018.
[12]:
Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J. Long Short-Term Memory. Neural Computation 9(8):1735-80, 1997.
[13]: Shi X, Chen Z, Wang H, Yeung DY, Wong Wk, Woo
Wc. Convolutional LSTM Network: A Machine Learning Approach for Precipitation
Nowcasting. arXiv:1506.04214, 2015.