Dushyant Kumar1, Deepa Thakuri1, Blake Benyard1, Hari Hariharan1, Ravi Prakash Reddy Nanga1, and Ravinder Reddy1
1Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
Synopsis
Though
oldest noninvasive imaging biomarker for creatine kinase (CK) reaction in exercised muscle, phosphorous
magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31PMRS) suffers from the poor
resolution. The 2D creatine Chemical
Exchange Saturation Transfer allows for the assessment of creatine recovery
with excellent in plane spatial resolution, it was not possible to construct
voxel wise parametric maps for recovery time constant due to low signal to
noise ratio (SNR). Recently developed 3D implementation of CrCEST allowed for
higher SNR and increased volumetric coverage and we exploit these two
advantages in our novel non-local spatially regularized approach to reconstruct
parametric map for recovery time constant.
Introduction
Systemic energy
deficiency, traditionally measured by 31PMRS (phosphorous magnetic
resonance spectroscopy) as the delayed phosphocreatine (PCr) recovery in exercised muscle, has been implicated in various
disorders, including primary mitochondrial disorders(1), muscle injury(2), cardiovascular disease(3) and diabetes mellitus(4). However, 31PMRS suffers from poor spatial resolution. Recently developed 3D implementation of CrCEST, with temporal resolution of 30s(5), provides higher SNR and increased coverage. Exploiting these two advantages, we present a
non-local spatially regularized approach to reconstruct parametric map for
recovery time constants.Methods
3D
CrCEST MRI was acquired at a 7.0T MRI scanner (Siemens) using a 28-Channel
phased-array knee coil. First baseline CrCEST data was performed for 2 minutes, followed by 2
minutes of mild plantar flexion exercise (with 30 push/second, air pressure 8 pound per square inch) and then 8 minutes of post exercise CrCEST
imaging. The sequence
consisted of the pulse train (5x100ms Hanning windowed, duty cycle 99%, B1rms =2.9 μT), followed by single shot GRE read out with TR =3.5ms, TE =1.47ms,
BW =710Hz/pixel, T1 recovery delay =5s. Other imaging parameters
were: FOV = 160x160x40mm3; FOV phase 100%; spiral centric encoding order with
elliptical scanning, GRAPPA factor = 2, averaging = 1; # slices = 8; BW = 710
Hz/pixel; shots = 1 in
transverse orientation. Raw CEST images were acquired at 6 saturation offset
frequencies ±1.5, ±1.8, ±2.1ppm (relative to water resonance). WASSR images
(from ±0 to ±0.9 ppm with a step-size of ±0.15 ppm), with a saturation pulse at
B1rms of 0.29μT with 200ms duration, was used to correct for B0 in
homogeneities(6).
B1
Calibration: Baseline CEST weighted images were acquired for following B1rms= 1.31, 1.6, 2.04, 2.47, 2.91, 3.2, 3.64, 4.08, 4.37 μT and corresponding CrCEST maps were
calculated. Finally, the calibration was calculated using linear model (i.e.
polynomial of order 1) on the voxelwise basis.
Two healthy human
volunteer (males, 28, 40 years old) participated in the approved study
protocol. This volunteer #1 was known to have slow creatine recovery (recovery
time constant >100s), most likely due to his ~2 hour/day bike commute. Based
on post exercise PCr spectra, acquired in
a separate session, the acidosis was confirmed.
Recovery Parameters Fitting Algorithm: Mono-exponential course was assumed for creatine
recovery curve
$$y_{k}(t)
= A_0 + A_1 exp(-\frac{t}{\tau_{Cr}})$$ where $\tau_{Cr}$ = Cr recovery time
constant, A0 = baseline level
and A1 = interpolated values of post exercise CrCEST level at t approaches 0s. Starting with “noisy” time series data at any voxel “i" and time frame “k”: yexp(i)
= yk(i), the weighted average over spatial domain can be
written as:
$$y_{k}^{Smooth}(i) = \sum{W(i,j)y_{k}(j)}, where \, k \in
{1,2,3, ...t} ...[1]$$
Calculation
of weights:
Out of the 16 time points acquired, only first eight of the decay curve were
used for calculating the weight factors. The selected segment of time recovery curve
was normalized and then Exponential
Divergence score, Dij, was calculated between voxels i,j using
formula given in(7). The weight (w(i,j)<1) , between
ith and jth voxels in a neighborhood of radius 7,
was calculated by combining the similarity and distance metric:
$$
W(i,j) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{(i_x-j_x)^2 + (i_y-j_y)^2 + (i_z-j_z)^2)}} \times
\frac{(e^{-\frac{Dij}{h}})}{\sum_j{(e^{-\frac{Dij}{h}})}}$$
where h is the tuning parameter and was set to be ~0.001
empirically.
Finally, we inverted the smoothed data (Eqn. [1]) using nonlinear
least square solution utilizing Levenberg-Marquardt-Fletcher
algorithm(8).Results
Both
volunteers utilized lateral gastrocnemius (LG) and medial gastrocnemius (MG)
muscles during the exercise. A major part of LG muscle
show slow recovery. Fig. 1 compares the performance of the regularized approach
against non-regularized approach. By suppressing the noisy instability, the regularized
approach resulted in better depictions of underlying parametric maps in LG, MG.
As other muscle group did not get utilized in the exercise, asymmetry change
post exercise were not significant. The parametric map for volunteer 2 showed
significantly slower recovery kinetic in terms rate constants and a higher post
exercise elevation in % Cest asymmetry (Fig. 2). Volunteer 2 showed much faster recovery, which
is what we typically expect from a healthy volunteer with sedentary to
moderately physically active life style (Fig. 2). Discussion
The
proposed algorithm resulted in a noise robust maps of recovery time
constants and other related parameters. Parts of the parametric maps, for volunteer 2 with faster Cr
recovery, were noisy/patchy. On the basis of empirical
evidence, it appears that numerically robust parametric map reconstructions are only
possible if τCr >3x temporal resolution. Fortunately, this condition would easily be met for patients with compromised
creatine kinetics(1), (Cr recovery rates >1.5 minutes). However, this condition may not met be satisfied for healthy
volunteers with sedentary to moderately physically active life style. We are
currently working on developing experimental methods to reduce the temporal
resolution to ~15s and that would eliminate this restriction. In future, we
will perform simulations to investigate the τCr cut-off for reliable
parametric reconstruction. We also plan to perform scan-rescan on
a few patients with delayed CK kinetics.Conclusions
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time demonstration of the ability to produce inter- and intra- muscular variabilities of creatine recovery specific parameters in exercised muscle and may provide a better imaging biomarker in disease conditions with delayed CK recovery.Acknowledgements
This project was supported by National
Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering of the National Institute of
Health through grant number P41-EB015893
(NIH/NIBIB) and R56-AG062665 (NIH).References
1. DeBrosse
C, Nanga RPR, Wilson N, D'Aquilla K, Elliott M, Hariharan H, Yan F, Wade K,
Nguyen S, Worsley D, Parris-Skeete C, McCormick E, Xiao R, Cunningham ZZ,
Fishbein L, Nathanson KL, Lynch DR, Stallings VA, Yudkoff M, Falk MJ, Reddy R,
McCormack SE. Muscle oxidative phosphorylation quantitation using creatine
chemical exchange saturation transfer (CrCEST) MRI in mitochondrial disorders.
JCI Insight 2016;1(18):e88207.
2. Armstrong RB, Warren GL, Warren JA.
Mechanisms of exercise-induced muscle fibre injury. Sports Med
1991;12(3):184-207.
3. Ooi DS, Isotalo PA, Veinot JP.
Correlation of antemortem serum creatine kinase, creatine kinase-MB, troponin
I, and troponin T with cardiac pathology. Clin Chem 2000;46(3):338-344.
4. Popovich BK, Boheler KR, Dillmann
WH. Diabetes decreases creatine kinase enzyme activity and mRNA level in the
rat heart. Am J Physiol 1989;257(4 Pt 1):E573-577.
5. Kumar D, Nanga RPR, Thakuri D,
Cember A, Hariharan H, Reddy R. Title: Repeatability of Creatine Recovery
Constants in Exercise Muscle Measured using
3D Creatine Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (3D CrCEST) Imaging at
7.0T
International
Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine:: (submitted as an abstract); 2020.
6. Kim M, Gillen J, Landman BA, Zhou J,
van Zijl PC. Water saturation shift referencing (WASSR) for chemical exchange
saturation transfer (CEST) experiments. Magn Reson Med 2009;61(6):1441-1450.
7. Divergence
(statistics), Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divergence_(statistics).
8. Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm, Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levenberg%E2%80%93Marquardt_algorithm