Dominic Bertham1,2, Matthew Farrow3, Ai Lyn Tan3, Steven Tanner1, Paul Emery3, and John Biglands1
1Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, United Kingdom, 2Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, United Kingdom, 3Leeds institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
Synopsis
Muscular weakness is associated with fatty
infiltration and changes to muscle fibre structure.
Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be able to detect subtle muscle changes
in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Before
this method is used, variability of MRI measurements involving regions of interest (ROI) must first be measured. Fat fraction, T2
measurement and diffusion tensor imaging was performed on 19 participants
with RA. Intra-rater and inter-rater
variability of MRI measurements for thigh muscle ROIs were assessed. Inter-rater and intra-rater variability scores
were high, suggesting that these measurements are sufficiently precise to allow
the study of subtle changes to muscle.
Introduction
MRI allows the analysis of muscles in vivo while also being
non-invasive. Evidence suggests that quantitative
MRI measurements may be able to detect changes in muscle related to conditions such
as rheumatoid cachexia caused by rheumatoid arthritis (RA) 1. Rheumatoid cachexia is a form of muscle loss attributed
to chronic inflammation resulting in increased
skeletal muscle deterioration and weakness 2. This deterioration in RA patients is
believed to be related to the severity of the arthritis 3. Furthermore,
muscle composition may be affected by the deposition of fat inside muscle fibres
4. MRI is considered to be the gold standard
method for the evaluation of muscle volumes and micro structure 5 as well as intra-muscular
and inter-muscular fat 4. Quantitative MRI measurement has become an increasingly
important tool for the diagnosis of muscle disorders, disease tracking and
detection of sub clinical muscle disease 6,7. Fat fraction (FF) using the Dixon chemical
shift imaging method measures intramuscular fat 8; Diffusion
tensor imaging (DTI) parameters, such as mean diffusivity and fractional
anisotropy, are sensitive to changes in muscle micro structure 9,10. Measurements of T2 relaxation times of muscle,
with areas of high free water content in muscle (as in areas of inflammation caused by RA) manifest
as higher T2 values compared to T2 values of normal tissue 11. It may be possible to use these quantitative
MRI measurements to clinically assess muscular changes at an early stage and
identify pathology. Before this
technique is clinically tested the variability of
these measurements must firstly be established.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the variability of quantitative
measures of FF, DTI and T2 within the thigh muscles of participants in a study
involving nineteen RA diagnosed volunteers.Methods
This
study utilised STEAM-EPI diffusion, 2-point Dixon with a 3D gradient echo
readout (VIBE) and a multi-echo spin echo (MESE) SPAIR sequence to measure T2, (figure
3). 19 RA
participants who provided written informed consent to the MUSCLE II study (Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultra Sound CLinical Evaluation of muscle pathology II; REC:17/EM/0079) had an MRI of their thigh. ROIs were then drawn by two researchers using digital imaging software around the muscle groups that make up the hamstrings and quadriceps in the thigh. These ROIs of muscle were drawn on
the middle slice (20 of 40) of the in-phase 2-point VIBE Dixon volume. The ROIs were then copied on to the
corresponding slice of the STEAM-EPI diffusion
and MESE series, (Figure 3). Mean values
for each parameter for the hamstrings and quadriceps were obtained by combining
these ROIs and taking the mean value over all ROIs.
For
intra-rater repeatability, the chosen 19 MRI data sets were contoured twice by
the same researcher at a 6-month interval between measurements to reduce
bias. For inter-rater reproducibility the same 19 MRI data sets was contoured independently by two researchers. Variability was measured using the intra-class
correlation coefficient (ICC). Agreement
between the two measurement techniques was measured using Bland-Altman
plots. For ICC, a two-way mixed model
with absolute agreement was used. ICC
values between the two measurements are defined as: above 0.60 are classed as
good and values above 0.75 are classed as excellent 12.Results
(Figures
1 & 2) Bland Altman plots show there is good intra-rater
variability and inter-rater variability of MRI measures for hamstring and
quadricep muscle groups. ICC
measurements (figure 4) show excellent agreement for intra-rater variability
and inter-rater variability 12.Conclusion
It has been observed that there is low variability in FF and DTI measurements for healthy participants 13. We have now
shown that in patients with RA, Inter-rater and intra-rater
variability scores were high, providing excellent ICC results for
FF, DTI and T2 measurements. This implies that the measurements have sufficient
precision to detect subtle changes in muscle. This further suggests that these techniques have the potential to be used to investigate
changes in muscle in response to RA disease process,1,2.Acknowledgements
This paper presents independent research supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) and Leeds Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.References
1. von
Haehling, S. & Anker, S. D. Cachexia as a major underestimated and unmet
medical need: facts and numbers. J. Cachexia. Sarcopenia Muscle 1, 1–5 (2010).
2. Masuko, K. Rheumatoid
cachexia revisited: a metabolic co-morbidity in rheumatoid arthritis. Front.
Nutr. 1, 20 (2014).
3. Filippin, L. I. et al.
Temporal development of muscle atrophy in murine model of arthritis is related
to disease severity. J. Cachexia. Sarcopenia Muscle 4, 231–238 (2013).
4. Hausman, G. J., Basu, U.,
Du, M., Fernyhough-Culver, M. & Dodson, M. V. Intermuscular and
intramuscular adipose tissues: Bad vs. good adipose tissues. Adipocyte 3, 242–255 (2014).
5. Pons, C. et al.
Quantifying skeletal muscle volume and shape in humans using MRI: A systematic
review of validity and reliability. PLoS One 13, e0207847 (2018).
6. Díaz-Manera, J., Llauger,
J., Gallardo, E. & Illa, I. Muscle MRI in muscular dystrophies. Acta
Myol. myopathies cardiomyopathies Off. J. Mediterr. Soc. Myol. 34, 95–108 (2015).
7. Fischer, D., Bonati, U.
& Wattjes, M. P. Recent developments in muscle imaging of neuromuscular
disorders. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 29, 614–620 (2016).
8. Burakiewicz, J. et al.
Quantifying fat replacement of muscle by quantitative MRI in muscular
dystrophy. J. Neurol. 264,
2053–2067 (2017).
9. Damon, B. M. et al.
Skeletal muscle diffusion tensor-MRI fiber tracking: rationale, data
acquisition and analysis methods, applications and future directions. NMR
Biomed. 30,
(2017).
10. Novikov, D. S., Jensen, J.
H., Helpern, J. A. & Fieremans, E. Revealing mesoscopic structural
universality with diffusion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 5088–5093 (2014).
11. Johnston, J. H. et al.
Quantitative Skeletal Muscle MRI: Part 1, Derived T2 Fat Map in Differentiation
Between Boys With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and Healthy Boys. Am. J.
Roentgenol. 205,
W207–W215 (2015).
12. Cicchetti, D. V. Guidelines,
criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment
instruments in psychology. Psychol. Assess. 6, 284–290 (1994).
13. Farrow, M. et al.
Normal values and test–retest variability of stimulated-echo diffusion tensor
imaging and fat fraction measurements in the muscle. Br. J. Radiol. 92, 20190143 (2019).