Qinhe Zhang1, Wan Dong1, Yishi Wang2, Jiazheng Wang2, and Ailian Liu1
1The first affiliated hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China, 2Philips Healthcare, Beijing, China
Synopsis
This study measured the quantitative
imaging metrics
of the pancreas and correlated ADC,
sADC, D*,D, f, FF and R2* of pancreas with BMI, TAT, SAT and VAT. This study viewed that there was significant
relationship between R2* and VAT, TAT (r=0.495, 0.533, respectively). And, ADC
was related to SAT (r=0.460). These may illustrate the impact of different fat
distribution on the function of pancreas.
Introduction
At present, pancreatic fibrosis and steatosis
are important pathological processes of pancreatic injury repair caused by
acute and chronic pancreatitis, pancreatic tumor and other diseases[1].
Novel quantitative MR imaging techniques such as DWI, IVIM, 3D
mdixon-quant[2-3] can provide in vivo characterization of
tissues and have the potential to be non-invasive biomarkers to diagnose
certain solid organ pathologies. Quantitative imaging metrics can also be used to monitor the course of
therapy in clinical trials. However, there are lack of data on normal
quantitative metrics of the pancreas and correlation with obesity parameters
(e.g. BMI(body mass index, BMI), TAT(total adipose tissue,SAT( subcutaneous adipose tissue)
and VAT(visceral adipose tissue)).
Materials and methods
21 inpatients were included in this study, and underwent
upper abdomen MRI scans (including 3D mDIXON-quant, DWI, IVIM) at 3.0T.
Inpatients
had the following characteristics: age range, 22-73 years (average, 53.90 ±
12,837years); BMI range, 18.73-35.75 kg/m2 (average, 24.18 ± 3.93
kg/m2); TAT range, 115.26-355.18 cm2 (average, 226.16 ±
68.90 cm2); SAT range, 48.80-191.44 cm2 (average,
104.72 ± 40.58 cm2); VAT range, 43.39 - 216.37 cm2 (average,
121.44 ± 51.75 cm2). 3D mDIXON-quant sequence scanning parameters:FOV=375mm, TR/TE=6.0/1.05ms, voxel size
2.3mm×1.8mm, slice thick 5.0/-2.5. DWI sequence scanning parameters:FOV=450mm, TR/TE=7700/74ms, voxel size
3.7mm×6.3mm, slice thick 6.0/0. IVIM sequence scanning parameters:
FOV=400mm, TR/TE=3000/91ms, voxel size 3.0mm×2.5mm, slice thick 7.0/1.0. On
ISP workstation, 2D region of interest (ROI) were placed on the head, body and
tail regions of pancreas in DWI, IVIM and 3D mDIXON-quant, respectively(Fig.1). The mean value of three ROIs was calculated
as the value of the whole pancreas. ROIs area were approximately 25-100 mm2.
All ROIs were placed within the interested tissue by avoiding blood vessels,
pancreatic duct and abdominal adipose tissue as much as possible. The TFA and VFA
were measured using 3D mDIXON-quant at the level of L1-L2 using Image J (National Institutes of
Health, USA). The regions with a fat fraction of
>50% were marked red in the image. After manually placing the outlines in
the abdominal wall and skeletal muscle, the TFA and VFA could be automatically
calculated (Fig.2). The SFA equals to TFA minus VFA. The Spearman test was used to analyze the correlation between imaging parameters and BMI, SAT, VAT and TAT. This
study has been approved by the local IRB.Results
There was significant
correlation between R2* and VAT, TAT
(r=0.495,0.533, respectively). And, ADC was related to SAT (r=0.460). Other imaging parameters were not related with BMI, SAT, VAT and TAT(P>0.05).Discussions
This study viewed that R2* was related to VAT
and TAT, which demonstrated that central obesity may easily result in iron
deposition of pancreas[4]. While there was a positive relationship
between ADC and SAT. It may reveal that SAT may have a protective effect on the
pancreas.conclusion
This study measured the ADC, sADC, D*,D, f, FF and R2* of the pancreas in
subjects with no pancreas disease. R2* was related to VAT and TAT, as the SAT
increases, the ADC value decreases.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement foundReferences
1Tirkes, Dhiraj Yadav,et al.Magnetic
resonance imaging as a non‑invasive method for the assessment of pancreatic fbrosis (MINIMAP): a comprehensive study design from the
consortium for the study of chronic pancreatitis[J]. Abdominal Radiology,
2019,44:2809–2821.
2Christophe Cassinotto, Matthieu Feldis, et
al.MR relaxometry in chronic liver diseases: Comparison of T1 mapping, T2
mapping, and diffusion-weighted imaging for assessing cirrhosis diagnosis and
severity[J]. European Journal of Radiology, 2015, 84:1459–1465.
3Yoon Jeong Hee, Lee Jeong Min, Lee Kyung Bun et al.
Pancreatic
Steatosis and Fibrosis: Quantitative Assessment with Preoperative
Multiparametric MR Imaging[J]. Radiology, 2016, 279: 140-50.
4Li Ruo-Kun, Zeng Meng-Su,Qiang Jin-Wei et al. Improving Detection of Iron Deposition in
Cirrhotic Liver Using Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging With Emphasis on
Histopathological Correlation[J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2017, 41: 18-24.