Bradley Bolster, Jr.1, Stephan Kannengiesser2, and Vibhas Deshpande3
1Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT, United States, 2Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany, 3Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Austin, TX, United States
Synopsis
This study demonstrates in inline implementation of a radial free breathing MRE sequence with integrating radial self gating. Measured stiffness values are consistent across self-gating threshold values and results are in good agreement with standard breath-hold MRE techniques.
Introduction
While most adults can reliably perform the
multiple breath holds required for the modern abdominal MRI exams, this is not
typically the case for children or the very sick. Eliminating breath holds from as many
protocols as possible increases the accessibility of these diagnostic tools to
a patient population which can benefit substantially from them. Magnetic
Resonance Elastography (MRE) provides a non-invasive method of assessing
hepatic stiffness and liver fibrosis1. Because this technique is sensitive
to very small oscillating displacements in the tissue, it is potentially
challenging to base it on free-breathing acquisitions. Previously, radial k-space trajectories have
been applied to MRE along with self-gating to improve accuracy of stiffness
measurements in the presence of respiratory motion2. In this study we present a 2D gradient echo
(GRE) based radial free breathing MRE sequence
with radial self-navigation implemented inline. The impact of this motion mitigation technique
is evaluated in normal volunteers at both 1.5 and 3T.Methods
Sequence: A prototype 2D radial GRE based MRE sequence was implemented. Linear interleaved radial view ordering was
used in this validation which divided the total number of views into 8
interleaves. MRE motion encoding was through plane using a full cycle, first
moment nulled, motion encoding gradient (MEG).
Two MEG polarities were acquired for each view. A full set of radial k-space was acquired at
each polarity for each of four different phase offsets by augmenting the
trigger for the MRE mechanical driver (Resoundant, Rochester MN, USA) which was
operating at 60Hz.
Reconstruction Pipeline: Acquired views were processed to extract the
self-gating signal from the k-space center samples at a temporal resolution of
2*TR = 100ms from each receive coil channel.
The resulting waveforms were baseline-corrected and the channel with the
best signal quality and consistency across all phase offsets was selected as the
input to the self-gating binning algorithm.
A representative self-gating waveform is shown in Figure 1. Based
on a predefined percentage this algorithm binned the views occurring at or near
end expiration determined as the values at which the self-gating signal spent
the most time. The reduced view set was
then regridded for each MEG polarity and processed with the standard 2D MRE
inversion.
Seven free-breathing datasets were collected in
three healthy volunteers. Acquisitions
were performed at both 1.5 and 3T (MAGNETOM Aera (6) and MAGNETOM Prismafit(1),
respectively; Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). Each subject underwent
informed consent under IRB oversight. A Cartesian breath-held (BH) GRE MRE
acquisition was performed on each volunteer followed by one or more free-breathing
(FB) radial MRE acquisitions using the prototype sequence. Table 1 shows the
range of imaging parameters applied for both the BH and FB sequences. Raw data
were saved to enable retrospective reconstructions with different parameter
settings.
Data from each subject was reprocessed by the
inline reconstruction implementation for a variety of self-gating thresholds
ranging from 20% of the data kept to the full 100%. The resulting image data
and stiffness maps were analyzed using a custom MATLAB script (Mathworks, Inc.,
MA, USA) that defined a region of interest (ROI) inside a manual segmentation
of the liver. Voxels with > 90% CI
(as calculated by the inversion) were included in that ROI. Mean
and standard deviation of stiffness in the ROI as well as the number of included
pixels were calculated in each case.Results
The addition of self-gating to the
reconstruction pipeline resulted in a negligible increase in reconstruction
time. In the single slice acquisitions
collected in this study all reconstructions completed less than 30 seconds after
the end of the scan. The algorithm was easily configurable from the
scanner UI. Magnitude, stiffness and
wave images with 90% CI contours for a representative dataset are shown in
Figure 2. As shown in the figure stiffness
values of the radial self-gated acquisition are within 2% of the standard BH
gradient echo acquisition. Figure 3
shows a plot of stiffness difference between the FB-radial acquisition and the
BH-cartesian acquisition as a function of radial self-gating percentage for the
7 datasets acquired for this study. Except
for a few low signal-to-noise outliers, calculated stiffness values within the
90% CI ROI were consistent across all self-gating percentages. In
addition, these values compared favorably with conventional Cartesian breath-hold
MRE. Though not shown here, ROI area
trended higher with increasing self-gating percentage, presumably as a function
of increased signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) with more views being used in the
reconstruction. Conclusion
We have presented an inline implementation of radial
free breathing MRE with radial self-gating integrated into the reconstruction
pipeline. This study had two primary findings: measured stiffness very little with
self-gating threshold and the stiffness values using the FB-MRE sequence are in
strong agreement with traditional Cartesian BH MRE. These findings are consistent with published
results using manual offline versions of this technique. The inline implementation demonstrated in this
study will enable a larger-scale in-vivo validation going forward. Further refinement of self-gating acquisition
and waveform definition techniques may increase the impact of self-gating over
uncorrected FB acquisitions.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.
Venkatesh,
Sudhakar K., Meng Yin, and Richard L. Ehman. "Magnetic resonance
elastography of liver: technique, analysis, and clinical applications." Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 37.3
(2013): 544-555.
2.
Holtrop,
Joseph et al. “Free Breathing Radial Magnetic Resonance Elastography” Proc.
Int. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med. 27th. p 4482 (2019).