Melany Atkins1 and Ersin Bayram2
1Fairfax Radiological Consultants, Arlington, VA, United States, 2General Electric, Houston, TX, United States
Synopsis
Breath-held acquisitions have long been a staple of body MRI to cope with respiratory motion. While this strategy works for many patients, it is challenging for some. Change in breath-hold capacity from one patient to the next requires frequent parameter tweaking, thus operator skillset becomes a key factor in image quality and consistency. Recent advances in novel motion robust acquisition methods and improved hardware such as Air coils have opened the possibility to perform complete free breathing exams. In this study, we report the feasibility results of free breathing integration into our routine abdominal MRI practice.
INTRODUCTION
Many patients are unable to breath-hold for a multitude of
reasons including: imaging under anesthesia/sedation, shortness of breath,
illness, claustrophobia, language barriers, or even hearing
difficulties. In addition, these issues can also cause significant
variability between breath holds that can lead to additional artifact. Traditionally,
respiratory navigation has been inefficient, adding significant scan time,
limiting usability for the entire exam. Development of faster respiratory
navigation techniques, such as DISCO LAVA [1], with more rapid post contrast
sequence acquisition, has afforded the ability to perform a free breathing dynamic
acquisition. Successful application of radial approaches to free breathing
are reported [2]. However, these methods suffer from streak artifacts, inflexible
FOV prescription, long reconstruction time and could generate substantially
more images putting more pressure on radiologists. Utilizing Cartesian
acquisition across the board allowed us to link the coverages and field of FOV
across different sequences and make the transition easier as we replaced a
breath-hold LAVA with a free breathing DISCO LAVA for about the same duration
per phase. METHODS
Full free breathing abdominal MR examinations were performed
on a GE Signa Premier 3T Magnet utilizing the Air coil taking advantage of the
higher acceleration factors to cope with the scan time impact of respiratory
motion navigated scans. Integrated auto-navigation was utilized for auto placement
of navigator tracker [3]. Liver mass protocol MRI includes the
following navigated sequences: Axial fat suppressed Single shot T2, Axial
multi-shot DWI, Axial in/out phase, and Axial Dynamic T1. The DISCO LAVA
is the critical component in our free breathing exam strategy as it allows us
to acquire dynamic T1 with excellent temporal resolution. With this sequence, we moved to a fixed delay (10s)
without bolus tracking, thus further simplifying the complexity of the dynamic
acquisition. Abdominal MRI/MRCP examination includes the same sequences as the
Liver mass protocol with additional 3D MRCP acquired in a coronal plane and an
axial 2D MRCP sequence. RESULTS
We were able to integrate a complete free breathing
examination into our routine abdominal MR protocols. A total of 17 patients underwent this new free breathing exam.
Total scan time for this free breathing protocol has ranged from 17 to 28
minutes, which is well within our standard 45 minute time slot. One
patient was sent to our facility for a repeat free breathing examination due to
a non-diagnostic prior exam. This exam was completed in 22 minutes with
excellent image quality. An MRI/MRCP examination in another patient was
performed in 26 minutes fully navigated. DISCUSSION
Development of novel respiratory navigation techniques with
integration of newer hardware capabilities has allowed us to transition to full
free breathing abdominal MRI protocol. Initial feasibility results on 17 patients demonstrated good image quality with
improved patient comfort. In addition, the need for repeat sequences has
decreased due to improvements in respiratory motion. Residual motion
artifacts were seen in some of the images, but these did not hinder the
diagnostic performance. We will continue to monitor the performance especially
in more challenging cases such as ascites, irregular breathers, and sleep apnea
patients. CONCLUSION
Free breathing abdominal MR examination is an unmet clinical
need both in the inpatient and outpatient setting. Our initial feasibility results show that
there is potential for a complete free breathing exam. Future developments in respiratory navigation
and available sequences are needed to improve options for free breathing
abdominal MR examinations. Although auto-navigation
techniques have improved, it will likely fail in some patients. Therefore, additional research is necessary
to refine motion robust acquisition schemes for these instances. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Feng L, Axel L, Chandarana H, Block
KT, Sodickson DK, Otazo R. XD-GRASP: Golden-angle radial MRI with
reconstruction of extra motion-state dimensions using compressed sensing. Magn
Reson Med. 2016;75(2):775-88.
2. Saranathan M, Rettmann DW, Hargreaves BA, Clarke SE, Vasanawala SS. Differential subsampling with
cartesian ordering (DISCO): a high spatio-temporal resolution dixon imaging
sequence for multiphasic contrast enhanced abdominal imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;35:1484–1492
3. Goto, Takao, & Kabasawa,
Hiroyuki (2010). Automated positioning of scan plane and navigator tracker in
MRI liver scan. Medical Imaging Technology, (suppl), 8.