Iyad Naim1,2, Gordon Moran2, Penny Gowland1,2, Caroline Hoad1,2, E Simpson 2,3, and Jordan McGing2
1Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom, 2Nottingham Digestive Disease Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom, 3Metabolic and Molecular Physiology, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre Campus, Nottingham, United Kingdom
Synopsis
Crohn’s
disease (CD) is an inflammatory bowel disease which effects 150k people in the
UK alone. Visceral fat hypertrophy is a characteristic radiological finding in
CD.To date radiologists just describe it but are not able to provide more
objective data regarding visceral fat volume. In this retrospective study we
used 2-point mDixon fat Images along with image processing techniques to study
visceral fat properties in CD patients compared with healthy volunteers. The
data demonstrated a tendency of CD patients to have a higher ratio of visceral
fat and more volume of intestines fully surrounded by fat compared with healthy
volunteers.
Introduction
Crohn’s
disease (CD) is a chronic, relapsing and remitting inflammatory disease of the
gastrointestinal (GI) tract affecting 150k people in the UK [1]. The traditional
management of CD involves a stepwise escalation of treatment. However, this
approach can lead to a delay in those at high risk of disease progression. The correlation between symptoms and endoscopic disease activity is poor so there
is a risk of under treatment [2]. Objective evidence of inflammation is
required when considering treatment alterations. Hence, inflammation resolution
on cross sectional imaging is suggested as an alternative to invasive endoscopy
[3]. Fat
wrapping refers to the hypertrophy of mesenteric fat to partially cover the
small or large intestine. In CD, adipose tissue accumulation is localized around
the inflamed intestinal segments. As a result, CD patients tend to have higher
ratio of intra-abdominal visceral fat (VAT) to total abdominal fat when
compared with healthy controls [4, 5]. Although visceral fat hypertrophy is
subjectively commented upon by radiologists, no automated quantitative measures
were developed to adequately evaluate the effects of fat wrapping in CD.
Aim : To Investigate the effects of fat wrapping in CD by measuring abdominal VAT volume and distribution in CD patients compared to healthy controls. Methods
We
developed an automated segmentation software in MATLAB (Mathsworks, Natick, MA,
USA) to segment fat only images derived from 2 point mDixon MRI data (acquired
on Philips 1.5 T and 3.0 T MRI scanners) into visceral (VAT) and Subcutaneous
(SAT) adipose tissue. The algorithm relies on analyzing the abdominal fat
shapes and estimating the intra-abdominal using a combination of filters and
morphological processes. In order to validate the resulting segmentation (Fig
1), the segmentations were compared to manually segmented images on each slice
axial slice using the Sørensen–Dice coefficient [6]. Seven data sets were used
for this validation.
To
study the effect of fat wrapping in CD a retrospective study was then performed
on 19 healthy volunteers (6 Females and 13 Males) with BMI = 26±5 kg/m2 and 17
CD patients (8 Females and 9 Males) with BMI = 25±3 kg/m2 scanned using mDixon
across the abdominal area between L3-S1. The algorithm was used to calculate
the ratio of VAT to total abdominal fat volume. Next it was used to determine
the ratio of the volume of the intestines that were fully surrounded by fat to
total volume of intestines, by automatically searching for holes in the
visceral fat regions which are large enough to be filled by intestines as shown
in
Figure 2. Finally the inter-abdominal area was also segmented into right
side and left side by automatically drawing a line along the spine and the
ratios of fat one the right side over total abdominal fat volume was
calculated.
Results
The
segmentation algorithm performance gave Dice coefficients of 0.95±0.016 for
automatic compared to manual VAT segmentation and 0.98±0.005 for SAT
segmentation.
Figure
3A shows the ratio of VAT to total abdominal fat volume was slightly greater in
CD than healthy controls but with non-significant P-Value. Figure 3B shows the
ratio of intestinal volume fully surrounded by fat to the total volume of
intestines is greater in male patients with CD (p=0.01).
Figure 3C shows the
ratio of fat on the right side of the abdomen to total visceral fat was
significantly higher for CD patients than healthy controls (p=0.17) overall but
dominated by female subjects. Figure 3D shows absolute VAT volumes in CD and
healthy volunteers for comparison.Discussion
The
retrospective study data demonstrated a trend for CD patients to have a slightly
higher ratio of VAT to total abdominal fat and more volume of intestines fully
surrounded by fat when compared with healthy controls, although this affects males
more than the females. Figure 4 shows that CD patients tend to have a higher
VAT fat ratio on the right side of the abdomen when compared with healthy
control which correspond to the ascending colon and terminal ileum where the
greatest fat wrapping for ileal crohn's disease would be expected, but this
affects females more than males.
We
have split the data by sex as gender differences are expected in abdominal fat
distributions, but it is important to point out that by separating male and
female data, the sample size is reduced and therefore anomalous results affect
these group level results. This work needs to be extended to larger groups of
patients with a wider range of BMI, and with retrospective surgical
confirmation of the results.Conclusion
These
potential new markers of fat wrapping may provide clinically useful, relatively
simple additional new markers of inflammation in crohn’s disease.Acknowledgements
This work is funded by the Biomedical Research center and The Haydn Green institute for innovation and entrepreneurship.References
[1] Mayberry, J. F., Lobo, A.,
Ford, A. C., & Thomas, A. (2013). NICE clinical guideline (CG152): The management
of Crohn’s disease in adults, children and young people. Alimentary
Pharmacology and Therapeutics.
[2] Gracie, D. J., Williams, C. J.
M., Sood, R., Mumtaz, S., Bholah, M. H., Hamlin, P. J., & Ford, A. C.
(2016). Poor correlation between clinical disease activity and mucosal
inflammation, and the role of psychological comorbidity, in inflammatory bowel
disease.
[3] Miles, A., Bhatnagar, G.,
Halligan, S., Gupta, A., Tolan, D., Zealley, I., … Duncan, G. (2019). Magnetic
resonance enterography, small bowel ultrasound and colonoscopy to diagnose and
stage Crohn’s disease: patient acceptability and perceived burden.
[4] Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology.
Thiberge, C., Charpentier, C., Gillibert, A.,
Modzelewski, R., Dacher, J. N., Savoye, G., & Savoye-Collet, C. (2018).
Lower subcutaneous or visceral adiposity assessed by abdominal computed
tomography could predict adverse outcome in patients with Crohn’s disease. Journal
of Crohn’s and Colitis, 12(12), 1429–1437.
[5] Cravo, M. L., Velho, S.,
Torres, J., Costa Santos, M. P., Palmela, C., Cruz, R., … Baracos, V. (2017).
Lower skeletal muscle attenuation and high visceral fat index are associated
with complicated disease in patients with Crohn’s disease: An exploratory study.
Clinical Nutrition ESPEN, 21, 79–85.
[6] Zou, K. H., Warfield, S. K.,
Bharatha, A., Tempany, C. M. C., Kaus, M. R., Haker, S. J., … Kikinis, R.
(2004). Statistical Validation of Image Segmentation Quality Based on a Spatial
Overlap Index. Academic Radiology.