John P. Mugler1, Elisabeth Weiland2, Thomas Benkert2, Craig H. Meyer1, Josef Pfeuffer2, and Berthold Kiefer2
1University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States, 2Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany
Synopsis
Current
free-breathing, respiratory-triggered, heavily T2-weighted 3D fast/turbo spin-echo
acquisitions work well in many patients for MRCP, but non-diagnostic results are
obtained in some patients, particularly those with irregular breathing patterns
during the several-minute acquisition. Thus,
there has been renewed interest in 3D MRCP techniques that can be completed
within a single breath-hold period as an alternative for patients in
whom free-breathing techniques are inadequate.
This work demonstrates that breath-hold 3D MRCP based on a 3D stack-of-spirals
turbo spin-echo acquisition, which uses in-plane acceleration to achieve a
reasonable breath-hold time, can provide good image quality for evaluation of major ductal structures.
Introduction & Purpose:
Magnetic
resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is routinely used for clinical
assessment of the biliary and pancreatic duct systems. Current approaches often use a free-breathing,
heavily T2-weighted 3D fast/turbo spin-echo acquisition that is respiratory triggered. While this type of acquisition works well in
many patients, non-diagnostic results are obtained in some patients,
particularly those with irregular breathing patterns during the several-minute
acquisition time. Recently, there has
been renewed interest in 3D MRCP techniques that can be completed within a
single breath-hold period1,2 as an alternative for patients in whom
current free-breathing techniques are inadequate. The purpose of this work was to: (1) explore
the feasibility of breath-hold 3D MRCP based on a 3D stack-of-spirals turbo spin-echo
acquisition that uses in-plane acceleration to achieve a reasonable breath-hold
time; and (2) investigate the influence of encoding order on artifacts from
fluids, such as in the stomach or intestines, that move during the breath-hold period
in some subjects.Methods:
The
prototype 3D stack-of-spirals turbo spin-echo acquisition was based on a
commercial version of single-slab 3D turbo spin-echo imaging (SPACE, Siemens Healthcare,
Erlangen, Germany) modified to support a stack-of-spirals acquisition. The signal evolution along the spin-echo
train was mapped to the through-plane (3D) Cartesian phase-encoding direction
to obtain the desired image-contrast properties3. In-plane acceleration was implemented by
acquiring a reduced number of spiral interleaves (e.g., every second or third
interleaf) for each k-space plane and
reconstructing the resulting data using a SPIRiT4-based algorithm implemented
on the MR scanner. The 3D data were first
Fourier transformed along the third dimension, and SPIRiT-based reconstruction
was then performed on each plane of undersampled spiral data. Dual-density
spiral waveforms were used to provide fully sampled data for the central portion
of each k-space plane and
undersampled data for the remainder5. Trajectory corrections (gradient delay and
eddy current) for each spiral interleaf were integrated into the online image
reconstruction6.
Typical
parameters included a TR 2500 ms with a restore (driven equilibrium) “flip-back”
RF pulse at the end of each spin-echo train, TE 610-850 ms, 16 dual-density
4480-µs spiral-out interleaves per k-space
plane (3-fold acceleration), 140° refocusing RF pulses, in-plane spatial
resolution 1.3 mm, through-plane spatial resolution 2.0 or 2.9 mm (interpolated
to 2.0 mm), and 24 or 30 encoding steps in the 3D direction. Total acquisition (breath-hold) time was 18
seconds.
In
some subjects, motion of fluids, such as in the stomach or intestines,
occurred during the breath-hold period and caused artifacts. Four different encoding orders were evaluated
with respect to artifact characteristics, including: (a) the
flexible phase-encoding order used in the commercial SPACE pulse sequence7
adapted to map interleaf angles to echo trains such that the variation in
interleaf angle among echoes was small for a given echo train8 (“default”
encoding order, which collected all through-plane [Cartesian] encoding steps with
each shot); (b) all spiral-interleaf angles collected in each shot with reordering
of interleaves to suppress signal discontinuities (“interleaves in 1-shot” encoding
order); (c) order b with, in addition, randomized order of through-plane
Cartesian phase encoding (“shuffle” encoding order); and (d) order a
with a large interleaf-angle increment between time-consecutive interleaves (“skip”
encoding order).
The
accelerated 3D stack-of-spirals turbo spin-echo acquisition and various
encoding orders were tested in phantoms and in ten healthy volunteers (after
obtaining informed consent) on 1.5T (MAGNETOM Aera) and 3T (MAGNETOM Prisma) MR
scanners (both Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) using phased-array body
and spine RF coils.Results & Discussion:
Figure
1, showing coronal maximum-intensity-projection images from two volunteers, illustrates
the representative image quality obtained using the prototype 3D stack-of-spirals
turbo spin-echo MRCP acquisition. The
gall bladder and major ductal structures are depicted with high signal-to-noise
ratio.
Using
the default encoding order, some subjects exhibited artifacts due to motion of
fluids during the breath-hold period (Fig. 2, left). These in-plane swirl-like artifacts were
suppressed using the interleaves in 1-shot encoding order (Fig. 2, right). Nonetheless, with the interleaves in 1-shot encoding
order, the swirl-like artifacts were converted to ghost artifacts in the
through-plane (Cartesian-encoding) direction (Fig. 3, left). The shuffle encoding order smeared out the Cartesian-ghost
artifacts, but did not sufficiently decrease their intensity. The skip encoding order eliminated the Cartesian-ghost
artifacts (Fig. 3, right) while moving the swirl artifacts toward the edge of
the field of view and greatly reducing artifact intensity (Fig. 4, right). The use of variable (versus dual) density spirals
may further reduce artifact intensity with the skip encoding order.Conclusions & Future Work:
This
preliminary study has demonstrated the feasibility of performing breath-hold
MRCP using an accelerated 3D stack-of-spirals turbo spin-echo MRCP acquisition
to obtain good image quality for evaluating major ductal structures. This method could be an alternative or
adjunct to free-breathing methods in subjects with irregular breathing patterns. Several encoding orders were investigated for
suppressing artifacts from fluid motion during the breath-hold period. Future work will include direct comparison of
the 3D spiral-based technique to both free-breathing 3D MRCP and alternatives
for breath-hold 3D MRCP, such as those described in references 1 and 2. We will also explore further optimization of
the 3D spiral-based MRCP acquisition to permit shorter breath-hold durations, increased
spatial resolution/coverage, and improved artifact suppression.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Chandarana H et al. Three-dimensional
MR cholangiopancreatography in a breath hold with sparsity-based reconstruction
of highly undersampled data. Radiology
2016; 280:585-94.
2. Nam JG et al. GRASE Revisited: Breath-hold
three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography using a
Gradient and Spin Echo (GRASE) technique at 3 T. Eur Radiol 2018; 28:3721-3728.
3. Fielden S et al. Variable‐flip angle 3D‐turbo spin echo
imaging utilizing spiral acquisitions. Proc ISMRM 19 (2011); 2820.
4. Lustig M, Pauly JM. SPIRiT: Iterative self-consistent
parallel imaging reconstruction from arbitrary k-space. Magn Reson Med 2010; 64:457-471.
5. Meyer CH et al. Dual-density and
parallel spiral ASL for motion artifact reduction. Proc ISMRM 19 (2011); 3986.
6. Tan H, Meyer CH. Estimation of k-space
trajectories in spiral MRI. Magn Reson Med 2009; 61:1396-1404.
7. Li G et al. The shifted radial reordering for intermediate
TE imaging in 3D long echo train acquisition. Proc ISMRM 17 (2009); 2623.
8. Li G et al. Reducing fluctuation of train
trajectories in 3D TSE imaging with compressed sampling. Proc ISMRM 21 (2013); 3711.