Andreas Max Weng1, Simon Veldhoen1, Christian Kestler1, and Herbert Köstler1
1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
Synopsis
Until now, no study assessed
the error that arises during calculation of quantitative functional lung
parameters obtained from MRI. Using a bootstrapping approach with shuffling
residuals the error of ventilation and perfusion (amplitude and phase) of the SENCEFUL
technique was investigated in this study.
Obtained error values were in an acceptable range rendering quantitative
functional lung MRI a promising technique for the assessment of regional
alterations in lung function.
INTRODUCTION
Recently, some new MRI
based lung function testing approaches complement standard lung function tests
like spirometry or body plethysmography. Proposed methods range from the use of
(hyperpolarized) noble gases like Xenon (1) or Helium (2) over fluorinated gases (3,4) to completely unenhanced techniques like standard
Fourier decomposition (5–7) and SElf-gated Non-Contrast-Enhanced
FUnctional Lung (SENCEFUL) imaging (8 - 10).
However, none of the
studies assessed the error of the estimated quantitative parameters, which was
the aim of the current study.METHODS
Quantitative functional lung imaging using the
SENCEFUL approach was performed in one healthy volunteer (HC), one patient with
cystic fibrosis (CF) and one patient with acute pulmonary embolism (PE).
For imaging, a two-dimensional (2D) FLASH sequence
with asymmetric echo readout was used on a 3T scanner (Siemens Magnetom Prisma) employing the following acquisition
parameters: field-of-view (FOV) = 450 x 450 mm2, matrix = 128 x 128,
slice thickness = 10 mm, slice orientation = coronal, repetition time (TR) =
2.5 ms, echo time (TE) = 0.69 ms, acquisition time (TA) = 160 sec, flip-angle =
8°. After each readout, gradients were wound back and the direct current signal
for self-gating was acquired. A total of 64,000 readouts was obtained for each
slice. The phase encoding steps were chosen according to a Niederreiter quasi random
number sequence (11, 12) to decouple the
sampling pattern from the periodic physiological processes namely breathing and
cardiac motion.
Calculation of
functional lung parameters was performed using the SENCEFUL method as described
previously (8,9,13). The perfusion
amplitude for every voxel was calculated from the first harmonic of the signal
amplitude over the cardiac cycle and normalized by choosing a reference ROI
either in the descending aorta or the pulmonary trunk. The time to
peak-enhancement or equivalently the perfusion phase is determined as the phase
of that first harmonic.
In addition, quantitative ventilation values can be
calculated for every voxel of the lung parenchyma following the approach
presented by Zapke et al. (14) giving values
in ml gas per ml lung parenchyma.
During the estimation
of the functional parameters, either perfusion or ventilation related, data
modeling is performed via fitting a harmonic along the temporal dimension of
the cardiac or the breathing cycle. By subtracting the model data from the
original reconstructed dataset, residuals were calculated for every time point.
In a bootstrapping approach (resampling residuals) the residuals were randomly
permuted and added to the model data. From this new data functional maps were
calculated again. By repeating the steps of randomly permuting the residuals
and calculating functional maps for 100 times, a stack of quantitative
functional parameter maps was generated. Subsequently, the standard deviation
over the stack in each voxel was calculated representing the error of the observed
functional parameter. By that, maps of the error of the functional parameters were
calculated.RESULTS
Figure 1 shows parametric maps of all subjects:
healthy first row, CF second row and PE in the third row. The first column
shows fractional ventilation with the corresponding error map in the second
column. Perfusion amplitude and error are presented in columns three and four
while perfusion phase and errors are presented in the last two columns.
Ventilation could be
assessed with a mean error from 0.01 ml gas / ml parenchyma (healthy control)
to 0.03 ml gas / ml parenchyma (pulmonary embolism). The mean error in
perfusion amplitude was consistently 0.01 for all participants while the mean error
of the perfusion phase was in the range from 0.13 (HC) to 0.66 (PE). A summary
of all results is presented in table 1.CONCLUSION
SENCEFUL MRI provides voxel-wise information on lung ventilation and
perfusion amplitude and perfusion phase. The magnitude of the error is in an
acceptable range rendering this technique suitable for assessing local
ventilation and/or perfusion deficits in the lung. In some cases like pulmonary
embolism, the error maps illustrated that a determination of the perfusion
phase is not possible in regions with very low perfusion signal.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Kern AL, et al., Magn. Reson. Med. 2019.
2. Van Beek EJR, et al., J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2004.
3. Jacob RE, et al., Magn. Reson. Med. 2005.
4. Gutberlet M, et al., Acad. Radiol. 2019.
5. Bauman G, et al., Magn. Reson. Med. 2009.
6. Bauman G, et al., Magn. Reson. Med. 2016.
7. Deimling M, et al., Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 2008.
8. Fischer A, et al., NMR Biomed. 2014.
9. Veldhoen S, et al., Radiology. 2017.
10. Mendes Pereira L, et
al., Magn. Reson. Med. 2018.
11. Weick S, et al., Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 2011.
12. Niederreiter H, Bull.
Am. Math. Soc. 1978.
13. Stäb D, et al., Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 2015.
14. Zapke M, et al., Respir. Res. 2006.