Federico Pineda1, Ty Easley1, Deepa Sheth1, Hiroyuki Abe1, Milica Medved1, and Gregory Karczmar1
1University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
Synopsis
MRI will likely take on a greater role in breast cancer screening. However,
one of the main concerns with MRI's expanded role is that it will
lead to many false positives. This work aims to alleviate this problem by
leveraging the advantages of ultrafast imaging of initial enhancement. Here we
calculated parameters descriptive of the texture of enhancement and its changes
throughout the ultrafast series. The results show that 4-D texture parameters may be
useful in classifying suspicious lesions (AUC=0.75), the resulting model could
have ruled out malignancy in 18% of the benign lesions analyzed, while
maintaining 100% sensitivity.
Introduction
Mammography
has limited sensitivity in women with dense breasts1. Recent work has shown that abbreviated MRI
protocols are an effective tool for screening women with dense breasts2–4, while reducing concerns about MRI’s costs by
reducing overall examination time. However, concerns about MRI’s potentially increased
biopsy rates relative to mammography have been cited as a reason against its
wider adoption in breast cancer screening5. Techniques that boost the diagnostic accuracy
of breast MRI could help alleviate these concerns and lead to its wider
adoption as a screening tool. Previous studies6–10 have reported the advantages of high-temporal-resolution
(or ‘ultrafast’) DCE-MRI protocols in characterizing suspicious breast lesions
via the kinetics of early enhancement. Textural analysis of breast lesions has
also been shown to yield useful information for lesion classification11, although there are limited studies on texture
in ultrafast imaging. 4-dimensional textural analysis (over 3 spatial and 1
temporal dimensions) yields parameters descriptive of the spatiotemporal
patterns of enhancement and may yield useful information concerning tumor
vascular physiology and may differentiate benign from malignant lesions12. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the
performance of 4-D texture features from ultrafast DCE-MRI in differentiating
suspicious breast lesions.Methods
59
patients with dense breasts (BI-RADS categories C or D) and suspicious findings
on mammography (BI-RADS 4 or 5) were enrolled in this prospective study. After
informed consent, patients received a research MRI prior to biopsy. Patients
were scanned on 1.5T (n=5) and 3T (n=54) scanners. The DCE-MRI protocol
included ultrafast imaging during the initial minute after contrast administration
(0.1mM/kg gadobenic acid), with temporal resolution ranging from 2 to 10s.
4-dimensional (3 spatial and 1 temporal dimensions) gray-level co-occurrence
matrices (GLCM) were calculated for rectangular ROIs encompassing each lesion
through the entire ultrafast series. Twelve Haralick features13 were calculated from each lesion’s GLCM. The
maximum, minimum and mean values for each of the 12 features were used to
populate a logistic regression model for binary diagnosis using the biopsy
results as the gold-standard. In order to eliminate unimportant parameters from
the model, and to avoid overfitting, LASSO regularization was performed14. Once the most parsimonious model was
identified, the classification accuracy of the model was assessed by calculating
the area under the ROC curve (AUC) utilizing leave-one-out cross-validation. Results
83 lesions were included in the analysis; 39 benign and 44
malignant. Representative examples of lesions imaged, and their enhancement
throughout the ultrafast series, are shown in Figure 1. The logistic regression model populated with the 5 most
important textural features (as identified by LASSO regularization) achieved an
AUC of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.64 – 0.85). The 5 features used in the model were:
maximum contrast, inertia, cluster shade, and minimum variance and sum mean. Fixing
sensitivity at 100%, the model generated from the features selected could have
ruled out malignancy in 7 (or 18%) of the benign lesions. This would mean an
increase in the positive predictive value (PPV 3) from 53% with mammography to
58% with textural kinetic analysis of ultrafast lesions. Discussion and Conclusions
4-D texture calculated from ultrafast DCE MR images may be a
useful aid in the diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions. The results suggest
that the spatiotemporal patterns of very early enhancement could be a marker
for malignancy. This type of analysis could help identify lesions that have a
very low likelihood of being malignant, avoiding unnecessary biopsies in cases
that could be safely followed-up with imaging. This analysis was performed with
just one minute of post-contrast ultrafast DCE-MRI imaging. In an abbreviated
MRI protocol, ultrafast imaging could be performed for the initial minute of
post-contrast imaging, before switching to the high-spatial-resolution
sequence, potentially boosting the PPV of abbreviated protocols.Acknowledgements
R01 CA218700, R44 CA186313, U01 CA142565References
1. Weber B, Hayes J,
Phil Evans W. Breast Density and the Importance of Supplemental Screening. Curr.
Breast Cancer Rep. 2018;10(2):122–130.
2. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Strobel K, et al. Abbreviated breast Magnetic
Resonance Imaging (MRI): First postcontrast subtracted images and maximum-intensity
projection - A novel approach to breast cancer screening with MRI. J. Clin.
Oncol. 2014;32:2304–2310.
3. Sheth D, Abe H. Abbreviated MRI and Accelerated MRI for Screening and
Diagnosis of Breast Cancer. Top. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2017;26(5):183–189.
4. Chhor CM, Mercado CL. Abbreviated MRI protocols: Wave of the future for
breast cancer screening. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2017;208(2):284–289.
5. Siu AL. Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task
Force Recommendation Statement. Ann. Intern. Med. 2016;164(4):279.
6. Pineda FD, Medved M, Wang S, et al. Ultrafast Bilateral DCE-MRI of the
Breast with Conventional Fourier Sampling. Acad. Radiol.
2016;23(9):1137–1144.
7. Mann RM, Mus RD, van Zelst J, et al. A Novel Approach to Contrast-Enhanced
Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Screening. Invest. Radiol.
2014;49(9):579–585.
8. Mus RD, Borelli C, Bult P, et al. Time to enhancement derived from
ultrafast breast MRI as a novel parameter to discriminate benign from malignant
breast lesions. Eur. J. Radiol. 2017;89:90–96.
9. Abe H, Mori N, Tsuchiya K, et al. Kinetic Analysis of Benign and
Malignant Breast Lesions With Ultrafast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI:
Comparison With Standard Kinetic Assessment. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2016;207(5):1159–1166.
10. Platel B, Mus R, Welte T, et al. Automated Characterization of Breast
Lesions Imaged With an Ultrafast DCE-MR Protocol. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging.
2014;33(2):225–232.
11. Milenkovic J, Dalmbox Drawings Light Down MU, Žgajnar J, et al. Textural
analysis of early-phase spatiotemporal changes in contrast enhancement of
breast lesions imaged with an ultrafast DCE-MRI protocol: Med. Phys.
2017;44(9):4652–4664.
12. Woods BJ, Clymer BD, Kurc T, et al. Malignant-lesion segmentation
using 4D co-occurrence texture analysis applied to dynamic contrast-enhanced
magnetic resonance breast image data. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging.
2007;25(3):495–501.
13. Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I. Textural Features for Image
Classification. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. 1973;SMC-3(6):610–621.
14. Tibshirani R. Regression Shrinkage and Selection Via the Lasso. J.
R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B. 1996;58(1):267–288.