Julio Sotelo1,2,3, Malenka M Bissell4, Yaxin Jiang4, Hernan Mella1,2,3, Joaquin Mura3,5, and Sergio Uribe1,3,6,7
1Biomedical Imaging Center, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile, 2Department of Electrical Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile, 3Millennium Nucleus for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, Santiago, Chile, 4Department of Biomedical Imaging Science, Leeds Institute to Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 5Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Santiago, Chile, 6Department of Radiology, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile, 7Institute for Biological and Medical Engineering, Schools of Engineering, Medicine and Biological Sciences, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
Synopsis
The circulation is normally analyzed in a 2D cross-section
of the aorta, manually placed. To avoid this problem, evaluate and validate a
new methodology based on Finite Elements (FE) to calculate the circulation in
three-dimensions, in in-silico models, and in the ascending aorta of a group of
volunteers and patients. In in-silico experiment we obtain an RMSE of the
circulation values less than 1.6e-6. We also found that significant
differences exist between volunteers and patients with a p-value of 0.0283. Our method is straight forward to calculate,
accurate and robust throughout different resolutions and noise levels.
INTRODUCTION:
Prognostic models based on cardiovascular hemodynamic
parameters can add new information for an assessment of different cardiovascular diseases. This evidence may play
a key role in longitudinal monitoring and reduction of long-term risk of
cardiovascular events. Rotational and helical flow in the aorta has been found to be a potentially important imaging biomarker in many cardiac diseases such
as bicuspid aortic valve disease. The circulation is a metric used in fluid
dynamics to quantify the rotational components of flow and is normally analyzed
in a 2D cross-section of the aorta1,2. But it is well known that the
generation of this cross-section is highly operator dependent, only gives local
information, the 3D information is omitted and is time-consuming. The purpose
of this work is the evaluation and validation of a new methodology based on
Finite Elements (FE) to calculate the circulation in three-dimensions, in
in-silico models, and in the ascending aorta of a group of volunteers and
patients and to investigate if it can be used as a robust metric.METHODS:
Theoretically,
the circulation (Γ) is
calculated as the integral of vorticity (ω) with respect
to the area within a transverse plane through the aorta Stokes' theorem. To
avoid the different problems of the actual 2D metrics, we apply a global
least-squares stress projection method3,4 to calculate the vorticity
from 4D flow MRI data, and FE formulation5 to calculate the area and
axial unit vectors (α) of the
geometry. The forward vorticity is calculated as the dot product between axial
unit vectors and the vorticity vectors (ωf = ω·α). Finally, the circulation is calculated as the
spatial integral of the forward vorticity in each level set generated by
Laplace solution (Fig.1). To validate our method, we created an in-silico 3D
cylindrical phantoms, using a combination of the Poiseuille flow equation and
modified expression of the Lamb-Oseen equation3, for different mesh
resolutions and noise levels (Fig.2). Finally, we evaluated the application of
our methodology in 4D Flow MRI data of ascending aorta of six healthy
volunteers (5 males, mean age 30.1 (range 26 - 38) years old, and six BAV
patients (4 males, mean age 25.5 (range 14-45) years old) three with right and three with left-handed flow, at peak systole. The volunteer data were
acquired in a 3T Philips MR scanner (Achieva, Philips Healthcare, Best The
Netherlands) and the patient data using a clinical 3T Trio SIEMENS MR scanner
(Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). To compare the results, we performed a Mann-Whitney
U-test between volunteers and patients (right and
left-handed flow). The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics
(version 25.0 IBM SPSS, Chicago, IL). The quantification of circulation was
performed in MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA), and for visualization
purposes, we use Paraview (KitwareInc., Clifton Park, New York, USA).RESULTS:
In in-silico experiment Fig.3, we obtain an RMSE of the
circulation values less than 1.6e-6 between the theoretical values
and our results, we demonstrate the robustness and convergence of our method
throughout different resolutions and noise levels. Comparing the circulation
mean ± SD of volunteer 13.83±28.78
cm2/s (Fig.4), patients right-handed 724.37±317.53
cm2/s and patients with left-handed -480.99±387.29
cm2/s (Fig.5), we found that exists significant differences between
both groups with a p-value of 0.0283, between right-handed and volunteer, and
also for left-handed and volunteer groups.
The group of patients shown a huge dispersion of circulation [cm2/s]
data, interquartile range [Q1 | Q3] of axial circulation for the group of
volunteers [-4.0 | 37.1] cm2/s and patients right-handed [363.4 |
960.6] cm2/s and patients with left-handed [-891.4 | 121.9] cm2/s.CONCLUSION:
Three-dimensional circulation (Γ)
based on finite element, is straight forward to calculate, accurate and robust
throughout different resolutions and noise levels. Allowing us the
quantification of the entire three-dimensional rotational flow characteristic
in the ascending aorta. The interquartile range of values calculated in
volunteer data is found to be narrow compared to those seen in patients
(p-value of 0.0283) and the measure correctly differentiated between the
visually seen right and left-handed helical flow, which suggests that this approach may have high clinical sensitivity.Acknowledgements
This publication has received
funding from Millenium Science Initiative of the Ministry of Economy,
Development and Tourism, grant Nucleus for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.
Also, has been supported by CONICYT - PIA - Anillo ACT1416, CONICYT FONDEF/I
Concurso IDeA en dos etapas ID15|10284, and FONDECYT # 1181057. Sotelo J. thanks to FONDECYT Postdoctorado 2017 #3170737.References
1. Hess AT, Bissell MM, Glaze SJ, et al. Evaluation
of circulation, Γ, as a quantifying metric in 4D flow MRI. J Cardiovasc Magn
Reson. 2013;15(Suppl 1):E36.
2. Rodríguez-Palomares JF, Dux-Santoy L, Guala A, et
al. Aortic flow patterns and wall shear stress maps by 4D-flow
cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the assessment of aortic dilatation in
bicuspid aortic valve disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018 Apr 26;20(1):28.
3. Sotelo J, Urbina J, Valverde I, et al. Three-dimensional
quantification of vorticity and helicity from 3D cine PC-MRI using
finite-element interpolations. Magn Reson Med. 2018 Jan;79(1):541-553.
4. Sotelo J, Urbina J, Valverde I, et al. 3D
Quantification of Wall Shear Stress and Oscillatory Shear Index Using a
Finite-Element Method in 3D CINE PC-MRI Data of the Thoracic Aorta. IEEE Trans
Med Imaging. 2016 Jun;35(6):1475-87
5. Sotelo J, Dux-Santoy L, Guala A, et al. 3D axial
and circumferential wall shear stress from 4D flow MRI data using a finite
element method and a laplacian approach. Magn Reson Med. 2018
May;79(5):2816-2823.