Yichen Zheng1, Ziling Jiao1, Aiqi Sun2, Bo Zhao3,4, and Rui Li1
1Center for Biomedical Imaging Research, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, 2Neusoft Medical Systems, Shanghai, China, 3Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Chalestown, MA, United States, 4Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
Synopsis
Non gated real-time cardiac MR imaging with
Partial Separable model provides a promising way to overcome the limitation of
conventional cine imaging. The new method is able to capture the beat by beat
variation, which is especially suitable for arrhythmia. In this study, we have
2 aims. First, to evaluate the consistency of parameters between the
conventional cine method and the PS model based real-time method, and second,
to capture beat by beat variation in arrhythmia patient.
Introduction
Heart disease is the leading cause of death
around the world. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) has made great
contributions to evaluate the cardiac function. Recently, real-time cardiac MR
imaging provides a promising way to overcome the limitation of conventional
cine imaging. For example, the new method with Partial Separable model [1,
2, 3] is able to capture the beat by beat variation, which is especially
suitable for arrhythmia. Without electro-cardiogram (ECG) gating and
breath-hold, the technique is easy to scan. However, the accuracy of the method
remains to be proved. In this study, we have 2 aims. First, to evaluate the
consistency of parameters between the conventional cine method and the PS model
based real-time method, and second, to capture beat by beat variation in
arrhythmia patient.Materials and Methods
Subjects: Four healthy volunteer (4 males, age: 22-27 years, median: 24.5
years) with no symptoms of cardiovascular disease and one patient with cardiac
arrhythmia (female, 26 years old) was were included. MRI Scan: Imaging experiments were conducted on a 3.0 T
whole-body MR scanner (Ingenia, Philips Medical System, Best, The Netherlands).
The scan region involved seven short axis slices from apex to base of the
heart. A 32-channel cardiovascular coil with T1-TFE sequence was used for scan.
Both cine method and real-time method were applied with the following scan
parameters: field of view (FOV) = 300mm×264mm (RL/AP), spatial resolution =
2.0mm×2.4mm, matrix size = 152×220, TR = 5.5ms, TE = 3.3ms, flip angle (FA) =
15°. The scan duration for each slice was 18 seconds with breath hold and ECG
gating for cine method, and 50 seconds without any gating for real-time method.
Temporal resolution = 33ms (for cine) / 11ms (for real-time). The acquisition trajectory
for real-time method was the same as reference [1]. Reconstruction: Images of
real-time were reconstructed with PS model. For cine image, sum of squares
(SOS) was applied. Image analysis:
Since images of real-time method included a long period with multiple cardiac
cycles, three cycles were selected randomly for evaluation. The endocardium and
epicardium of left ventricle (LV) were circled in the end systolic and end
diastolic. Clinical parameters including ejection fraction (EF), cardiac output
(CO), stroke volume index (SVI) and left ventricle mass (LVM) were calculated
for both cine cycles and three real-time cycles. Statistical analysis: The area of endo and epi and clinical
parameters were evaluated with Bland-Altman comparison between cine results and
averaged real-time results. Correlation coefficient were calculated to verify
the consistency of two methods. All statistical results were acquired from the
MedCalc (Version 18.2.1, MedlCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium).Results
Figure 1 showed the end systolic and end
diastolic images for both cine and real-time methods of one slice. The
morphology of cardiac for the two methods was similar to each other. The
Bland-Altman comparison for area of endo and epi in end systolic and end
diastolic of each slice between cine and real-time methods were shown in Figure
2. As can be seen, the area of real-time method was in great agreement with
cine method in different cardiac phase. Figure 3 showed the Bland-Altman
analysis of EF, CO, SVI and LVM to compare the clinical parameters between the
two methods. They all in great consistency. Figure 4 showed the median and
standard deviation of the clinical parameters for cine and real-time methods.
In addition, correlation coefficient was calculated, which demonstrated the
consistency of clinical parameters. Some results of arrhythmia were shown in
Figure 5. The variation with time of one line across the LV showed the
different cardiac cycles. The arrhythmia cycles were marked with arrow. The
variation of LV area also indicated the happening of arrhythmia.Discussion
The consistency between cine and real-time
cardiac imaging methods was investigated in this study. These results indicated
that the novel real-time method can acquired comparable images and clinical
parameters as conventional cine method. In particular, the irregular cycles
when arrhythmia occurs can be captured by the new method, which can provide
extra information for diagnosis. Future research will enlarge the number of subjects
and make further evaluation about arrhythmia. Conclusion
In this study, real-time cardiac imaging,
without ECG gating and respiratory control, was proved to be consistent with
conventional cine method. Particularly, the new method can capture irregular
cardiac cycles, which is beneficial for diagnosis of cardiac diseases. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Sun A, Zhao B, Li Y, et al. Real-time
phase-contrast flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance with low-rank modeling
and parallel imaging[J]. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2017,
19(1): 19.
[2] Zhao B, Haldar J P, Brinegar C, et al.
Low rank matrix recovery for real-time cardiac MRI. In Proceedings of 2010 IEEE
International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2010:
996-999.
[3] Liang Z.-P, Spatiotemporal imaging with
partially separable functions, IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical
Imaging, 2007, pp. 988-991.