Sven HF Jaeschke1 and Aaron T Hess1
1Oxford Centre For Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Synopsis
A number of retrospective Cartesian encoding strategies
exist for duel gated cardio-respiratory imaging, including freebreathing cine.
If respiration and cardiac motion are known prospectively while scanning, is
prospective sampling more efficient? To test this we developed an algorithm to
prospectively handle variable acquisition durations for each cardio-respiratory
bin while acquiring pre-defined Poisson-Disk variable density sampling masks.
We compared this to a retrospective spiral profile Cartesian trajectory and
found the prospective method had between 10% and 25% higher efficient for
matched scan time and had between 20% and 40% higher peak-to-sidelobe ratio of
the point-spread-function, which is beneficial for image reconstruction.
Introduction
High-resolution CINE imaging of the heart is
challenging due to long acquisition times, variable breathing patterns, and changing
heart rates. These physiological variations lead to different image acquisition
times for each distinctive cardio-respiratory motion state and consequently to differently
filled k-spaces. Cartesian sampling is attractive for speed of image
reconstruction, however if a standard linear ordered strategy is used large parts
of the k-space will be missed for some cardio-respiratory states (images).
Retrospective schemes address this using spiral profile k-space trajectories with a golden-angle view ordering scheme(1–3). They provide a near uniform variable
density k-space sampling in the presence of varying acquisition times and provide
temporal incoherence for flexible image reconstruction. However these
retrospective schemes repeatedly sample the same central k-space locations and sometimes
peripheral k-space. New motion detection methods that rapidly detect the
cardio-respiratory state using the RF coils can be used for prospective gating(4).
In this work, we consider a prospective k-space
encoding strategy for free-breathing cardiac CINE with (i) pre-defined k-space
sampling tables for each cardio-respiratory state, (ii) temporal-incoherence
and variable density masks with a randomised k-space traversal order, and (iii)
minimisation of eddycurrents associated with rapid changing phase encoding(5), by segmenting k-space into clusters.
We have termed this method CLustered, randomly Ordered Cartesian K-space
(CLOCK). We compare CLOCK to a retrospective method
with tiny golden-angle view ordering (CASPR-tiger)(2) in simulations. Methods
CLOCK algorithm: For each of
300 cardio-respiratory states (30 cardiac and 10 respiratory), a Poisson-disk variable
density sampling mask is created(6) with a fully sampled central region. Each mask is subdivided into Nc clusters, each with
the same number of samples per cluster (Ns). These clusters are arranged on
concentric rings. For 3D imaging each cluster has a pie-like shape and an equal
central angle. A maximum of six clusters per ring are used and multiple rings
were created to accommodate a larger matrix sizes, this is shown in figure 1.
The temporal order within each cluster is randomised, with the exception of the
central 5x5 samples of k-space that are placed at the beginning of the cluster
to increase the probability of measuring them.
During the scan the current phase
encoding is looked up in a table by incrementing the table index for the
current cardio-respiratory state and cluster (from 1 to Ns). When any one
cardio-respiratory state reaches Ns samples the next cluster is selected for
all states. The scan is complete when all clusters are complete in any one
state.
Using previously recorded cardio-respiratory
motion signals from five subjects(4)
simulations were carried out in MatLab (MathWorks). A 3D cine was simulated with a phase-encoding
matrix of 320x48 (PE1xPE2) and acceleration factors R=2 and R=4 for 3D-CLOCK with
Nc=7 and also for a the retrospective method CASPR-Tiger(2),
with a tiny golden-step of ), with N=10 elliptic rings
and N=10 angular segments(2).
Scan times for CASPR-Tiger were matched to the average scan time of CLOCK for
each data set.
The maximum of the peak-to-side-lobe
ratio (PSR) of the Point Spread Function (PSF) was calculated. In addition the
ratio of the standard deviation of the side-lobes to the main-lobe of the PSF were
calculated(7),
termed incoherence ratio. Both increase with encoding quality.
A volunteer was scanned at 7T
(Siemens) with an 8‐channel, dipole parallel transmit (pTx) /receive coil (MR
Coils) with a 3D thin-slab CINE GRE sequences (1.0×1.0×1.0 mm3;
TR/TE = 4/1.57 ms), and FOV and matrix size of 320×320×48mm3, R = 2.
The pTx scattering matrix was used to prospectively cardio-respiratory gate(4) with a 3 mm respiratory bin and 40 ms
cardiac bin. BART toolbox(6) was used for image reconstruction. Results
Data from one subject used in the
simulations is shown in Figure 2 along with how often each cardio-respiratory
state occurs. Figure 3 shows simulated CLOCK sampling patterns and PSF while
Figure 4 plots the PSR and incoherence ratios of CLOCK against CASPER-Tiger for
each cardiac phases of the end expiratory bin. On average the PSR is 38% higher for CLOCK
with R = 2 and 22 % higher with R=4. The average efficiency for CASPER-Tiger
was 83% and 90 % of that for CLOCK with matched durations for R =2 and R=4
respectively. A frame from the 7T in-vivo 3D CINE is shown in figure 5.Discussion
The prospective method had higher efficiency which was
markedly higher for the lower acceleration rate, this can be expected because
as acceleration rates increase the retrospective methods probability of
resampling decreases (with the exception of the centre of k-space). The
incoherence ratio improved when using CLOCK roughly in line with the improved
efficiency. What was unexpected was that the PSR improved more than twice as
much as the efficiency did when using CLOCK for both targeted acceleration
rates. This is likely due to the Poisson-Disk under sampling masks used in
CLOCK, which produce preferable side lobe properties. This may be beneficial
for compressed sensing image reconstruction. The improved acquisition efficiency
and PSF can be used for faster acquisition times while maintaining or improving
image quality.Conclusion
The proposed prospective encoding
strategy for 3D Cartesian CINE improves acquisition efficiency and enables a controlled
under-sampling mask. Acknowledgements
This work was supported by funding
from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) and Medical
Research Council (MRC) [grant number EP/L016052/1], the Clarendon Fund and Keble
College de Breyne Scholarship. AH thanks the British Heart Foundation centre of
research excellence (Oxford). References
1. Prieto C, Doneva M, Usman M, et al. Highly efficient respiratory motion
compensated free-breathing coronary MRA using golden-step Cartesian
acquisition. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2015;41:738–746 doi: 10.1002/jmri.24602.
2. Usman M, Ruijsink B, Nazir MS, Cruz G, Prieto C. Free breathing
whole-heart 3D CINE MRI with self-gated Cartesian trajectory. Magn. Reson.
Imaging 2017;38:129–137 doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2016.12.021.
3. Liu J, Saloner D. Accelerated MRI with CIRcular Cartesian UnderSampling
(CIRCUS): a variable density Cartesian sampling strategy for compressed sensing
and parallel imaging. Quant. Imaging Med. Surg. 2014;4:57–67 doi:
10.3978/j.issn.2223-4292.2014.02.01.
4. Jaeschke SHF, Robson MD, Hess AT. Scattering matrix imaging pulse
design for real‐time respiration and cardiac motion monitoring. Magn. Reson.
Med. 2019;82:2169–2177 doi: 10.1002/mrm.27884.
5. Bieri O, Markl M, Scheffler K. Analysis and compensation of eddy
currents in balanced SSFP. Magn. Reson. Med. 2005;54:129–137 doi:
10.1002/mrm.20527.
6. Uecker M, Tamir J, Ong F, Holme C, Lustig M. BART: version 0.4.01.
Zenodo 2017 doi: 10.5281/zenodo.592960.
7. Feng L, Grimm R, Block KT obia., et al. Golden-angle radial sparse
parallel MRI: combination of compressed sensing, parallel imaging, and
golden-angle radial sampling for fast and flexible dynamic volumetric MRI.
Magn. Reson. Med. 2014;72:707–717 doi: 10.1002/mrm.24980.