Bharath Ambale Venkatesh1, Jason Ortman2, Jaclyn Sesso2, Yoko Kato2, Elzbieta Chamera2, Jennifer Wagner3, Yoshimori Kassai4, and Joao Lima2
1Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States, 2Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States, 3Canon Medical Research USA, Mayfield Village, OH, United States, 4Canon Medical Systems, Kanagawa, Japan
Synopsis
Whole body non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography and Dixon imaging hold potential for monitoring and quantitative assessment of global plaque burden and cardiometabolic disease in frailty.
INTRODUCTION
Currently millions of elderly individuals are considered
frail, and their number is projected to rise steadily in the coming years.2,3
This, together with the burdensome clinical correlates of frailty, impose
increasing demands on healthcare systems worldwide. The overall research
objectives were: (1) Identify specific imaging phenotypes of fibrofatty
infiltration and subclinical atherosclerosis that differentiate frail from
non-frail individuals as assessed by the physical frailty phenotype, (2)
Demonstrate the utility of advanced imaging markers in clinical frailty
research and understanding underlying aging pathways.METHODS
Community dwelling older adults were recruited from an aging
studies registry. Screening criteria
based on the five measures included in the Frailty Phenotype were used.1 The screen
ascertains subjective and objective weakness, slow gait speed, decreased
mobility, and weight loss. To be declared frail by these criteria, subjects had
3, 4, or 5 components of this exam. To be declared non-frail, subjects must
have 0 positive frailty factors. The phenotype consists of the following
measures: (1) Grip Strength measured by a dynamometer; (2) Walking Speed timed
over 15 feet at their usual pace; (3) Weight loss of more than 5% of their body
weight in the previous year; (4) Exhaustion assessed using two items from the
CES-D Depression Scale - A) I felt that everything I do is an effort. B) I
cannot get going; (5) Physical Activity assessed using the modified Minnesota
Leisure Time Activities scale, which involves 18 questions on the amount of
activities performed in a week.
MRI was performed using a Canon Galan 3T with dedicated
coils. The entire scan was performed within 50 minutes for each of the
participants and involved no contrast administration. Participants were
positioned supine using the following MR coils: 16 Channel Atlas Neurovascular
Head, Atlas Spine, 2 Atlas body, and the 16 Channel Flex Coil. The participant
was positioned on the center of the table with both arms located by their sides
and legs internally rotated. Dual-echo 3D Dixon techniques were employed to
assess percent fat quantification with imaging parameters – TR/TE = 5.1/(1.1,
2.8) ms, flip angle = 12 deg, slice thickness = 3-5 mm, FOV = 42x42 cm, Matrix
256x256. Users defined regions-of interest for each of seventy-eight different
muscles comprising five different muscle groups (regions) –pectoral, forearm
(or upper limb), pelvic, thigh, and calf muscles. In addition, fat in the liver
was also quantified. ECG-prepared Fresh Blood Imaging (FBI) for non-contrast MR
angiography was used for assessment of atherosclerotic burden.4
Flow-Spoiled 3D ultrafast spin echo in half Fourier acquisitions were used for
fast acquisitions, with the phase encoding direction, parallel to vessel
direction. Users determined significant plaques semi-automatically for 22
(including left and right) different arterial territories – internal and common
carotid arteries, vertebral, subclavian, thoracic aorta, abdominal aorta,
iliac, femoral, popliteal, anterior and posterior tibial, and peroneal arteries.
Plaques were scored according to 4 categories – normal, <70% stenosis,
70-99% stenosis, and completely occluded. A composite atheroma burden score
based on all vessels was calculated as (Sum of vessel scores)/(number of
vessels).5 Modified look-locker imaging was used to
assess native T1 times of the myocardium, liver and skeletal muscle, and used
as surrogate markers of diffuse interstitial fibrosis: TR/TE = 2.6/1 ms, 1.5 x1.5 mm2 in-plane resolution, 10 mm slice thickness .6
Aortic length (length
perpendicular to aortic cross-section from the aortic root to the aorto-iliac
bifurcation) indexed to height and aortic tortuosity (aortic length/length of
straight line from start to end of aorta) will be calculated as markers of
aortic elongation.7RESULTS
Preliminary analysis from 7 frail individuals and 6 age-matched
robust controls is presented. Of 7 frail individuals, one had a prior heart
attack; one was previously diagnosed with heart failure. The atheroma score
(p<0.05), aortic length, and aortic toruosity were all higher in frail as
compared to robust individuals indicative of higher atherosclerotic burden and
vascular stiffness. Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue volumes were lower
in frail as compared to robust individuals. However, myocardial, liver and
skeletal muscle T1 times were higher indicative of greater diffuse interstitial
fibrosis (p<0.05 for myocardium). Intramuscular fat was measured across five
different regions – pelvis, forearm, pectus, thigh, and calf; the average
intramuscular fat percent was higher in frail compared to robust individuals
indicative of higher fatty infiltration (p<0.05 for calf). The total thigh
muscle volume was lower in frail as compared to robust controls (p<0.05).DISCUSSION and CONCLUSION
In this pilot study, we have demonstrated the possibility of
using comprehensive and non-contrast whole-body MR angiography to quantify atherosclerosis burden as well as using
Dixon imaging of muscle tissue to assess underlying cardiometabolic disease. We
also used native T1 estimates to assess diffuse interstitial fibrosis. Frailty
onset is characterized by reduced energy reserves, lack of resilience,
sarcopenia, lack of muscle volume and fatigability. Measures of fibrofatty
infiltration and nonsignificant atherosclerotic plaque burden may have the
potential to identify underlying subclinical cardiometabolic disease. These
measures may be useful to monitor and quantify progression towards frailty. In
addition, the lack of contrast administration, allows the participation of
those with renal dysfunction as well. Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by the Johns Hopkins University Pepper Center Older American Independence Center (
Funds to support this OAIC study were provided by the Johns
Hopkins University Older Americans Independence Center of the National Institute on Aging (NIA) under
award number P30AG021334) and with support from Canon Medical Research USA.References
1. Rodriguez-Mañas,
L. & Fried, L. P. Frailty in the clinical scenario. Lancet 385,
e7–e9 (2015).
2. Walston, J.
Frailty in older adults. Oxford Textbook of Geriatric Medicine (2017).
3. Fried, L.
P. et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. The
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
56, (2001).
4. Miyazaki,
M. & Akahane, M. Non‐contrast enhanced MR angiography: Established
techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 35, 1–19 (2012).
5. Weir-McCall,
J. R. et al. Whole-body cardiovascular MRI for the comparison of
atherosclerotic burden and cardiac remodelling in healthy South Asian and
European adults. Br J Radiology 89, 20160342 (2016).
6. Messroghli,
D. R. et al. Modified Look‐Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) for
high‐resolution T1 mapping of the heart. Magnet Reson Med 52,
141–146 (2004).
7. Franken, R.
et al. Increased aortic tortuosity indicates a more severe aortic
phenotype in adults with Marfan syndrome. Int J Cardiol 194,
7–12 (2015).