Yuki Kanazawa1, Masafumi Harada1, Tosiaki Miyati2, Takashi Abe1, Mitsuharu Miyoshi3, Yuki Matsumoto1, Hiroaki Hayashi2, Yasuhisa Kanematsu4, and Yasushi Takagi4
1Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan, 2Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan, 3Global MR Applications and Workflow, GE Healthcare Japan, Hino, Japan, 4Department of Neurosurgery, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
Synopsis
To
assess an activity within an atherosclerotic plaque, chemical exchange saturation
transfer (CEST) imaging was demonstrated with the multi-pool model Bloch
equation. This study was performed with eleven patients with carotid stenosis,
was evaluated with each estimated parameters; bulk
water, magnetization transfer, amide proton transfer (APT), and nuclear
Overhauser effect (NOE). There
was no significant difference between mean APT and NOE at 3.5 ppm. This result indicates that CEST
plaque imaging should be evaluated with distinguishing APT and NOE. Multi-parametric analysis of CEST
imaging may obtain detailed information for component as well as metabolite
substances within an atherosclerotic plaque.
Introduction
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been used for diagnosis
and evaluation of advanced atherosclerotic lesions, i.e., atherosclerotic
plaque. Conventional MRI such as T1 weighted (T1w)
and T2 weighted (T2w) imaging with
fat-suppression (FS) have various signal patterns depending on the histological
properties of each atherosclerotic plaque including the lipid rich necrotic
core (LRNC).1 However, because signal patterns of atherosclerotic plaques
from conventional MRI overlap considerably during clinical studies, it is
difficult to distinguish detailed characteristics.2 On the other hand,
chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging can detected mobile
macromolecular protons such as amide protons and is useful for some clinical
application. If CEST imaging can detect mobile proteins found within a plaque,
it may lead to a predictor of plaque activity. The purpose in our study was to assess
each parameter derived from CEST imaging using the multi-pool model Bloch
equation for atherosclerotic plaque cases.Materials and Methods
This prospective study was approved by the
institutional review board and all imaging datasets for eleven patients with carotid
stenosis was acquired from each patient after informed consent was obtained
from the patients. After
the MRI study, all patients had carotid
endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting (CAS) performed (Table 1). This
study was carried out on a 3.0 Tesla MR system (GE Healthcare) with NV-Head
coil as a receiver. A
CEST imaging dataset was acquired using a single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE)
sequence and phase cycle radio frequency (RF) preparation; the frequency offset
range was from -7 to +7 ppm at intervals of 0.5 ppm, and a total of 29 data
points were acquired. The mean B1
values of the MT pulses were set at 0.5, 1.0 µT, and the RF duration time was 1.5 sec. The other imaging
parameters were echo time, 27.9 ms; repetition time, 5719 ms; bandwidth, 473
Hz/pixel; field of view, 16 cm; matrix size, 128 × 128; slice thickness, 3 mm. Slice
positions were set at one or two slices on plaque observed with maximum area. Acquired
imaging data were applied to B0
correction and motion correction for each pixel. Post processing of CEST
imaging was performed using the multi-pool model Bloch
equation; bulk water, magnetization transfer (MT), amide proton transfer (APT),
and nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE). Each parameter estimation of the multi-pool
model Bloch equation was as follows;
$$\frac{dm}{dt}=A\cdot{m}+R_{1}{m_{0}}=0\left(Eq.1\right) $$
$$m=-A^{-1}R_{1}m_{0}\left(Eq.2\right)$$
where, A is a matrix representation including parameters
of MT, APT, and NOE, m0 is thermal equilibrium including bulk water. m is a steady state signal, which includes measured Z-spectrum. R1 is relaxation rate, which was fixed in this fitting. Each parameter was calculated from Z and CEST peak extraction (CPE)
spectrum fitting,3 which minimize the error between measured and calculated
Z-spectrum. Then APT and NOE concentration map were generated. To compare CEST images, conventional black blood MRI (T1w
and T2w images) was acquired. Region of interest (ROI)
analysis was performed for in-plane whole plaque. Then, conventional MRI
signals were normalized by muscle signal.
Results & Discussions
Figure 1 shows the scattered relationship for each
conventional MR signal and each estimation parameter in the plaque regions. The
relationship between bulk water and each conventional MR signal showed good
linearity (T1w, R = 0.66, P = 0. 252; T2w,
R = 0.69, P = 0.0185). Figure 2 shows violin plot measured values
of each estimated signal in the plaque regions. There was no significant
difference between mean APT and NOE at 3.5 ppm (Fig.2).
Figure 3 and 4 shows patients with atherosclerotic plaques. Both APT and NOE signal
were low in Fig. 3. However, both APT and NOE signal were high in Fig. 4. CEST imaging in the atherosclerotic plaque should be
evaluated with distinguishing APT and NOE. It is necessary to investigate and
clarify biomechanisms of increasing NOE signals within atherosclerotic plaques. Conclusion
Multi-parametric analysis of CEST imaging may obtain
detailed information for not only component but also metabolite substances within
an atherosclerotic plaque.Acknowledgements
This
study was partly supported by JSPS KAKENHI [grant number 17K09065].References
-
Cai JM, Hatsukami TS, Ferguson MS,
Small R, Polissar NL, Yuan C. Classification of human carotid atherosclerotic
lesions with in vivo multicontrast magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation.
2002;106(11):1368-73.
-
Saam T, Hatsukami TS, Takaya N, Chu
B, Underhill H, Kerwin WS, et al. The vulnerable, or high-risk, atherosclerotic
plaque: noninvasive MR imaging for characterization and assessment. Radiology.
2007;244(1):64-77.
-
Miyoshi M, Matsuda T, and Kabasawa H.
CEST Peak Extraction method for multi peak fitting. Proceedings of the 23th
Annual Meeting of ISMRM. 2015;3346.