Na Zhang1, Tingting Zhu2, Lijie Ren3, Lei Zhang1, Zhangyan Fan3, Liwen Wan1, Hairong Zheng1, and Xin Liu1
1Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China, 2Department of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Wuhan, China, 3Department of Neurology, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China
Synopsis
It
is generally believed small subcortical infarction (SSI) (also termed lacunar
stroke) is caused by intrinsic diseases of penetrating arteries. Recent
studies have shown the incidence of atherosclerosis in large arteries which is
an important pathogenesis of large subcortical infarction (LSI) is also high in
patients with SSI. This indicates the underlying mechanisms of SSI
in patients with large artery atherosclerosis may be the same with LSI and
inferred from plaque characteristics. However, the plaque characteristics
ultimately leading to SSI or LSI remain unclear. This study is to explore the
differences of plaque characteristics between patients with SSI and LSI.
Introduction
Small
subcortical infarction (SSI) (also termed lacunar stroke) accounts for about
25% of ischemic strokes and is commonly occurred on middle cerebral artery
(MCA) territory.1 It is generally believed that SSI is caused by
intrinsic diseases of penetrating arteries themselves.2 Several
recent studies have shown that the incidence of atherosclerosis in large
arteries which is an important pathogenesis of large subcortical infarction
(LSI) is also high in patients with SSI.3,4 This indicates the
underlying mechanisms of SSI in patients with large artery atherosclerosis may be
the same with that causing LSI and inferred from plaque characteristics.
However, the plaque characteristics ultimately leading to SSI or LSI remain
unclear. High-resolution magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging (HR-MRVWI) has demonstrated
the potential to depict
large arterial vessel wall lesions and characterize plaques and proven to be
reproducible.5-8 The aim of this study is to explore the differences
of plaque characteristics on MCA between patients with SSI and LSI using
HR-MRVWI. Materials and Methods
The
study was approved by the local institutional review board. Informed consent
was obtained from all patients. From 2017 to 2019, Seventy-one patients (mean
age, 47.49±11.5 years; 55 men) with recent ischemic stroke were prospectively
enrolled with the following inclusion criteria: (1) first time acute ischemic
stroke located subcortical within unilateral MCA territory identified by
T2W-FLAIR; (2) lack of coexistent ipsilateral internal carotid artery with
significant stenosis (≥50%) as confirmed by MRA, CTA, or DSA; (3) no evidence
of other stroke mechanisms (coagulopathy, a potential cardioembolic source of
disease, Moyamoya disease, dissection, etc). All patients underwent routine
brain MRI (T1w- and T2w-FLAIR) and HR-MRVWI examinations within four weeks of
symptom onset on a 3T MR system (Siemens Trio) with a custom designed
32-channel head-neck coil. Patients were divided into two groups by two
experienced neurologists in consensus according to the size of the lesion on
T2-FLAIR images: (1) Patients with maximal axial lesion diameter of ≤ 20 mm (SSI
group).9 (2) Patients with larger lesions which were not categorized
as SSI, including large deep perforator infarcts, border zone infarcts and
superficial perforator infarcts (LSI group).10 A cross-sectional
slice of the most stenotic location of MCA on the ipsilateral side of cerebral
infarction and a cross-sectional slice of the contralateral normal
vessel were reconstructed for assessing plaque distribution (superior,
inferior, dorsal, or ventral side of the vessel),11 plaque burden, remodeling pattern
(positive, intermediate or negative),12 and stenosis degree. In the
case of two or more quadrants are involved, the location and number of
quadrants were recorded. The patient demographics and the above plaque characteristics
were statistically compared between the two groups.Results
Of the
71 patients, 43 (60.6%) were determined as SSI and 28 (39.4%) were LSI. Patient
demographics are presented in Table 1. No
significant difference were found. No wall thickening was found on five
patients with SSI (11.6%). The comparison of the number of quadrants with
plaque formation and location of plaque distribution between groups were listed
in Table 2 and 3 respectively. The plaques of 13 patients with SSI involved
only one quadrant, and the proportion was significantly higher than that of LSI
(34.2% versus 7.1%, P=0.006). In addition, the 13 plaques were more
frequently located in the superior (46.2%) and dorsal sides (38.5%). The
occurrence of plaque involving two or more quadrants was roughly the same
between the groups, and plaques involving two quadrants was the most in both
groups, 17 and 19 plaques in SSI and LSI, respectively. The location of plaque
distribution in four quadrants between the two groups was similar. The ventral side
was a relatively common involved quadrant, while the dorsal side was a relatively
less involved quadrant. There was no significant difference of plaque burden
between groups (0.75±0.12 versus 0.79±0.10, P=0.162). The remodeling
pattern and stenosis degree between groups were shown in Figure 1. Most of the
plaques in both groups exhibited positive remodeling (52.6% in SSI and 53.6% in
LSI). There was no significant difference of
the percentage of remodeling patterns, but a significant higher incidence of
low-grade stenosis (<50% stenosis) was observed in SSI than LSI (68.4%
versus 42.9%, P = 0.037). More patients showed moderate to severe stenosis
(≥50% stenosis) in LSI group (Figure 2).Discussion and Conclusion
The
results of this study suggested that SSI maybe related to MCA atherosclerosis
and the plaque distribution may play an important role. High plaque burden
(>70%) and percentage of positive remodeling (>50%) were found in both
groups. This is because the patients recruited are symptomatic and hence the
plaques analyzed may be vulnerable. These similar plaque features between the
groups also suggested that SSI maybe not a mild form of LSI in large arterial
atherosclerosis. The lower stenosis degree of SSI may not affect the whole
vascular territory as LSI with relatively higher stenosis, but the specific
location of the plaque may obstruct the blood flow of perforator artery and will
lead to a smaller infarction. In conclusion, both SSI and LSI maybe associated
with major intracranial arterial atherosclerosis. But patients with SSI show a
relatively fewer number of quadrants with plaque formation and slighter degree
of stenosis.Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by National Natural
Science Foundation of China (81830056 and 81801691), Natural
Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2018A030313204), Shenzhen Basic
Research Program (JCYJ20180302145700745 and JCYJ20170413161350892).References
1. Pantoni
L. Cerebral small vessel disease: from pathogenesis and clinical
characteristics to therapeutic challenges. Lancet Neurol. 2010; 9(7):689-701.
2. Caplan
LR. Intracranial branch atheromatous disease: a neglected, understudied, and
underused concept. Neurology. 1989; 39(9):1246-50.
3. Xu
WH, Li ML, Niu JW, et al. Intracranial artery atherosclerosis and lumen
dilation in cerebral small-vessel diseases: a high-resolution MRI Study. CNS
Neurosci Ther. 2014; 20(4):364-7.
4. Zou
XD, Chung YC, Zhang L, et al. Middle Cerebral Artery Atherosclerotic Plaques in
Recent Small Subcortical Infarction: A Three-Dimensional High-resolution MR
Study. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015:540217.
5. Fan
Z, Yang Q, Deng Z, et al. Whole-brain intracranial vessel wall imaging at 3
Tesla using cerebrospinal fluid-attenuated T1-weighted 3D turbo spin echo. Magn
Reson Med 2017; 77(3):1142-1150.
6.
Zhang L, Zhang N, Wu J, et al. High resolution simultaneous imaging of
intracranial and extracranial arterial wall with improved cerebrospinal fluid
suppression. Magn Reson Imaging. 2017; 44:65-71
7.
Zhang N, Zhang F, Deng Z, et al. 3D whole-brain vessel wall cardiovascular
magnetic resonance imaging: a study on the reliability in the quantification of
intracranial vessel dimensions. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018; 20(1):39.
8. Wan
L, Zhang N, Zhang L, et al. Reproducibility of simultaneous imaging of
intracranial and extracranial arterial vessel walls using an improved
T1-weighted DANTE-SPACE sequence on a 3 T MR system. Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;
62:152-158.
9.
Wardlaw JM. What causes lacunar stroke? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;
76(5):617-9.
10. Bogousslavsky
J, Regli F. Centrum ovale infarcts: subcortical infarction in the superficial
territory of the middle cerebral artery. Neurology. 1992; 42(10):1992-8.
11. Xu
WH, Li ML, Gao S, et al. Plaque distribution of stenotic middle cerebral artery
and its clinical relevance. Stroke. 2011; 42(10):2957-9.
12.
Qiao Y, Anwar Z, Intrapiromkul J, et al. Patterns and Implications of
Intracranial Arterial Remodeling in Stroke Patients. Stroke. 2016; 47(2):434-40.