Yasuhiro Goto1, Michinobu Nagao2, Masami Yoneyama3, Isao Shiina1, Kazuo Kodaira1, Yutaka Hamatani1, Mamoru Takeyama1, Isao Tanaka1, and Shuji Sakai2
1Department of Radiological Services, Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, 2Department of Diagnostic imaging & Nuclear Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, 3Philips Japan, Tokyo, Japan
Synopsis
We compared the image quality of the motion-compensated
(MoCo) and conventional (non-MoCo) cardiac TSE-DWI by visual evaluation and
homogeneity evaluation. MC-TSE-DWI achieved superior image quality compared with
non-MoCo-TSE-DWI in all b-values and all segments. MoCo-TSE-DWI improves the image quality and may increase the diagnostic
potential.
Introduction
Cardiac DWI has a potential to achieve improved clinical
diagnosis through novel micro-structural and functional assessment1.
In previous study, we reported a utility of cardiac turbo spin-echo based DWI
(TSE-DWI) with peripheral gating in comparison with conventional EPI-DWI with
cardiac gating2. One of the challenges of cardiac TSE-DWI is to
maintain higher signal uniformities both within the slices and inter slices.
Furthermore, current TSE-DWI suffers from its low SNR and is sensitive to cardiac
motion compared to EPI3. Recently, a utility of motion-compensated
(MoCo) DW-EPI using motion-compensated motion probing gradient (MPG) has been
reported to quantify the diffusion and perfusion4. Therefore we attempted to combine both TSE-DWI and MoCo-DWI
(MoCo-TSE-DWI).
The purpose of this study was to compare the image quality
of the cardiac TSE-DWI between MoCo-TSE-DWI and conventional TSE-DWI
(non-MoCo-TSE-DWI).Methods
[Subjects]
Ten healthy volunteers (age range:
28-43 years) were examined using 3.0T MR clinical imager (Ingenia, Philips
Healthcare). To validate the feasibility of MoCo-TSE-DWI, we compared with
conventional TSE-DWI.
[Imaging quality assessment]
We
previously determined the actual trigger delay (TD) and data acquisition window using CINE imaging. We assessed the signal
uniformity of myocardium on the short-axis images of left ventricle. The
myocardium was divided into 6, 6, and 4 segments for the basal, mid, and
apical, respectively5. Circular region of interests (ROIs) were drawn on 16
myocardial segments. Subsequently, the mean and standard deviation were
measured. Furthermore, three radiologists evaluated usefulness in diagnosis
visually myocardium using 4-points scale.
[Signal uniformity assessment]
The coefficient of variation (CV) was
used as an estimation of myocardial signal uniformity as follows: CV = Standard
deviation/Average value
[Statistical analysis]
Statistical analysis was performed
with Wilcoxon signed-rank test and judged the difference as significant at
p<0.05.Results&Discussion
CV of MoCo-TSE-DWI was
significantly lower at mid and apical segments than those from TSE-DWI. Visual
score from MoCo-TSE-DWI were significantly higher at basal and mid segments
than those from TSE-DWI. The number of non-assessable myocardial decreased of
about 30% in the MoCo-TSE-DWI compared with the TSE-DWI.
TSE-DWI using MoCo improved the
signal uniformity entire circumference of myocardium. There was no difference
in visual score and availability in the apical segments between two methods.
There was no difference in
visual score between b-150(s/mm²) and b-300(s/mm²) using MoCo-TSE-DWI. In
contrast, visual score was for b-300(s/mm²) significantly lower than for b-150(s/mm²)
using non-MoCo. MoCo-TSE-DWI has the possibility to apply further higher b-values.
MoCo-TSE-DWI can provide robust
diffusion weighted images by compensating myocardial motion. Latterly, a utility of cardiac EPI-DWI using
acceleration MoCo (aMoCo) has
been reported to eliminate more pulsatile effects than MoCo6. In the
future, a combination with aMoCo is also being considered.Conclusion
MoCo-TSE-DWI improves the image quality
and might increase the diagnostic potential, compared with conventional (non-MoCo)
TSE-DWI. Cardiac MoCo-TSE-DWI could reduce myocardial signal
un-uniformity due to myocardial slight movement by applying motion-compensated
MPGs, and it might be useful for further assessment of the cardiac pathology.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
(1) Nielles-Vallespin S,et.al,Cardiac Diffusion: Technique and Practical Application. J Magn Reson Imaging.2019 Sep 4.
(2) Goto Y ,et.al,24th Annual Meeting of ISMRM,Singapore,2016 (Abstract2016).
(3) Alsop DC. Phase insensitive preparation of single-shot RARE: application to diffusion imaging in humans. Magn Reson Med. 1997 Oct;38(4)
(4) Froeling M, et.al. 22th Annual Meeting of ISMRM,Italy,2014 (Abstract2014).
(5) Circulation,105:539-42,2002. (6) Nakamura T, et.al,22th Annual Meeting of ISMRM,Italy,2014 (Abstract2014).