Qiying Tang1, Jianjun Zhou1, and Puyeh Wu2
1Xiamen Branch, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xiamen, China, 2MR Research China, GE Healthcare, Beijing, China
Synopsis
Diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) has not yet been widely studied in thyroid disease diagnosis. Here we investigate the feasibility
of DKI in distinguishing thyroid adenoma (TA) from papillary thyroid carcinoma
(PTC). We found that quantitative measurements provided by DKI were
significantly different between TA and PTC. A higher area under the curve of
mean diffusivity (MD) in discriminating TA from PTC was also observed. We concluded that
DKI can be used as a feasible technique and benefit the diagnostic performance
in distinguishing between TA and PTC.
Introduction
In current clinical routine, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and
the subsequent apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) can be used to differentiate
the thyroid adenoma (TA) from papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) [1]. However, it is still challenging due to a variety of imaging features of PTC. Pitfalls may occur when PTC presents with features more
commonly associated with benign nodules, such as cyst degeneration [2]. Diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), based on the
non-Gaussian water diffusion model, can provide more information on tissue
structure than standard monoexponential model [3]. Therefore, the
aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and whether the quantitative measurements
offered by DKI can benefit the diagnostic performance in distinguishing TA from PTC.Methods
Thirteen consecutive patients with thyroid nodules
were enrolled in this study, including six patients diagnosed with thyroid
adenomas and seven patients diagnosed with papillary thyroid carcinomas, according to
the surgery and histological results. All data were obtained on a 3T MR scanner
(Discovery MR750W, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA). All participants
underwent MR examinations including routine thyroid acquisitions, DWI (b = 0, 600
s/mm2) and DKI (b = 0, 1000, 2000 s/mm2, 15 diffusion
directions). Images analyses were performed on GE AW4.6 Workstation by two
radiologists, who were blinded to the pathologic results. The ROIs were
manually drawn on the maximal section of each lesion, carefully avoiding the
area of cystic degeneration, necrosis and bleeding. Quantitative measurements including
ADC from DWI, mean diffusivity (MD) and mean kurtosis (MK) from DKI in the ROIs were
extracted. Student’s t-test was applied to assess the difference between TA and
PTC. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to
evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of each parameter in discriminating TA from
PTC by the area under the curve (AUC).Results
We found that the value of MD was higher in TA than in
PTC (t = 2.716, P = 0.020), and the value of MK was lower in TA than in PTC (t =
-2.836, P = 0.016), while the value of ADC had no statistical significance
between them (t = 1.192, P = 0.863). The AUC value of MD and MK were 0.881 and 0.857,
respectively. Results of ROC curves indicated that MD had the highest AUC. The diagnostic
thresholds of MD and MK were 1.715 and 0.84, respectively.Discussion
DWI has been commonly utilized in regular
thyroid MRI. DKI, which can reflect the diffusion of tissue water molecules and
the complexity of tissue structure, however, has not yet been widely studied in
thyroid disease diagnosis. Our results demonstrated
that quantitative measurements provided by DKI are significantly different between
TA and PTC. TA is mainly composed of follicles in different sizes and loose tumor stroma, which may explain the higher MD in TA.
Although bleeding and cystic degeneration are commonly seen, the solid portion
of TA has relatively simple structure, resulting in a lower MK in TA presented
in our study. Microscopic features related to the classical PTC are papillary
structure, psammoma bodies,
peculiar appearance of the tumor cell nuclei, and the fibrosis of the tumor
stroma. Thus PTC presented a lower MD and a higher MK. As a new
technology conforming to non-Gaussian distribution, DKI can more objectively
reflect the diffusion of water molecules in vivo, and can provide relatively accurate
information about the microstructure of tissues. Overall, compared with conventional
DWI, DKI can more accurately reflect the characteristics of microenvironment and
water diffusion in tumor, and thus increase the ability in differentiating between
TA and PTC.Conclusion
The pilot study demonstrated that DKI sequence can be used to distinguish TA and PTC, and showed better performance than DWI.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Hao Y, Pan C, Chen W, et al.
Differentiation between malignant and benign thyroid nodules and stratification
of papillary thyroid cancer with aggressive histological features: Whole-lesion
diffusion-weighted imaging histogram analysis. J MAGN RESON IMAGING
2016;44(6):1546-55.
[2] Patel BN, Kamaya A, Desser TS. Pitfalls
in Sonographic Evaluation of Thyroid Abnormalities. Seminars in Ultrasound, CT
and MRI 2013;34(3):226-35.
[3] Shi RY, Yao QY, Zhou QY, et al.
Preliminary study of diffusion kurtosis imaging in thyroid nodules and its
histopathologic correlation. EUR RADIOL 2017;27(11):4710-20.