2004

Quantitative Analysis of Glioblastoma Treatment Using Dynamic Relaxation Contrast MRI at 9.4T
Jia Guo1, Nanyan Zhu2, Yanping Sun3, Sabrina J. Gjerswold-Selleck4, Hong-Jian Wei5,6, Pavan S. Upadhyayula6,7, Angeliki Mela6,7, Cheng-Chia Wu5,6, Peter D. Canoll6,7, John T. Vaughan4, Douglas L. Rothman8, and Scott A. Small9
1Department of Psychiatry, and Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States, 2Department of Biological Science, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States, 3Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States, 4Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States, 5Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States, 6Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States, 7Department of Pathology and Cell Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States, 8Departments of Diagnostic Radiology, or Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States, 9Departments of Neurology, Radiology or Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States

Synopsis

This abstract describes a novel dynamic T2-relaxation contrast magnetic resonance imaging (DRC-MRI) protocol for mapping the cerebral perfusion dynamics in mice. We demonstrate how to quantify cerebral perfusion dynamics with the proposed DRC modeling, which combines features of both dynamic and the steady-state methods. Quantitative analysis on both simulated and in vivo experimental data are performed. We first validate the reliability of our DRC modeling protocol with healthy mice before we apply the protocol on a tumor treatment study. We are able to demonstrate its ability to model the treatment effect of Etoposide on Glioblastoma in mice.

Introduction

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive and serious type of brain tumor [1]. Current standard GBM multiforme treatments [2][3][4] are effective in extending the patients' lifespan. Unfortunately, none of these regimens is curative of the disease [5]. By far, Etoposide administration seems to be one of the most promising chemotherapeutics [6][7][8][9]. However, studies that focused on in vivo evaluation of the treatment effects in animal models are limited. One of the potential obstacles is the lack of an imaging modality that can reflect brain metabolism and function at a high spatial resolution.
Hemodynamics modeling is widely used in MRI studies of transgenic mouse models. A commonly used method to obtain hemodynamics is the dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI (DSC-MRI) [10]. However, it is suboptimal for our application given the low resolution and distortion artifact [11]; moreover, it requires intravenous (IV) injection of contrast agent (CA) which is difficult to carry out repeatedly [12]. Steady-state imaging methods, such as steady-state contrast-enhanced (SSCE) MRI, boost the spatial resolution but are only viable for cerebral blood volume (CBV) mapping. To resolve these challenges, we implemented our new method called dynamic T2-relaxation contrast MRI (DRC-MRI) in mice, which allows for simultaneous modeling of hemodynamics at high resolution.

Method

Animal Subjects and Experimental Groups: In vivo experimental validation data was acquired from three 6-month-old wild-type (WT) male C57bl/6j mice and one mouse was scanned twice with 48 hours apart to assess test-retest reliability. Mice with GBM treatment used in our study are 4 age-matched C576J/BL mice which were randomly assigned to the treatment and control groups with 2 mice per group. PDGFB(+/+)PTEN(-/-)p53(-/-) GBM cells were administered into the brains of all mice in both experimental groups. 5,000 cells, with a total volume of 1 μL, were stereotactically injected into the brains. In the treatment group, Etoposide was intraperitoneally (IP) injected into the mice at a dosage of 40 mg/kg-body-weight 7 and 14 days after tumor implantation. T2-weighted MRI scans with IP-injected Gadodiamide were acquired for all subjects at 10 and 14 days after the initial treatment.
MRI Acquisition: A Bruker BioSpec 94/30 USR MRI with ParaVision 6.0.1 was used for the imaging. Twenty-five T2-weighted RARE scans of the mouse brain were dynamically acquired before and after the IP injections of the Gadodiamide at the dosage of 10 mmol/kg [12].
Hemodynamics Modeling: The proposed pipeline is illustrated in Fig.1. The mechanism of our DRC-MRI is described in Fig.2. This method was developed under the assumption that the IP injection of CA can be thought equivalent to continuous IV injection with dosage decreasing with time. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) was quantified based on the deconvolution model with tissue residue function analyzed in a similar way as the DSC-MRI. The product of CBF and the tissue residual function (R), CBF∙R, relates to the CA concentration time course (CTC) and the arterial input function (AIF) as described in equation $$$CTC(t) = (CBF\cdot R(t))\otimes AIF(t)$$$ [13], and can be isolated with SVD-deconvolution. We approximated the $$$\widehat{AIF}$$$ observed in the DRC experiment (Fig.2G) as a summation of 100 time-shifted mono-exponentially decaying fast bolus pass AIFs (Fig.2D). The CBV was quantified in a similar way as the SSCE-MRI, and the method will be illustrated as follows. With the CBF∙R calculated, the $$$\widehat{CTC}$$$ observed in the DRC experiment was calculated using equation $$$\widehat{CTC} (t)=(CBF\cdot R(t))\otimes(\Sigma_{i=1}^{N}(\alpha (i)\cdot AIF(t - i\cdot \Delta t)))$$$by first convolving each individual $$$AIF(t-i\cdot \Delta t)$$$ (Fig.2D) with the corresponding CBF-scaled TRF $$$CBF\cdot R (t-i\cdot \Delta t)$$$ (Fig.2E) to obtain $$$CTC(t-i\cdot \Delta t)$$$ (Fig.2F), and then summing them together to derive $$$\widehat{CTC}$$$ (Fig.2H). Relative CBF (rCBF) was modeled as the maximum value of $$$CBF\cdot R(t)$$$. Mean transit time (MTT) and wash-in rate (WIR) were derived as previously described in DSC-MRI (Fig.2M) [10].
GBM Treatment Analysis: To quantitatively evaluate the treatment effect at the GBM, we performed a multivariate K-means clustering on the WIR and relative CBV (rCBV) values to segment out the tumor region. Voxels in the scans automatically aggregated into 4 clusters corresponding to gray matter, white matter, cerebral spinal fluid, and tumor. Quantitative analysis was based on the tumor size and the averaged rCBV, rCBF, WIR values inside the tumor region.

Result

To validation DRC test-retest reliability, two scans of the same healthy mouse demonstrate high reliability for both CBF and CBV with whole-brain voxel-wise coefficient of determination R2>0.8 and ROI-wise R2>0.95 (Fig.3B). DRC-derived CBF and CBV were also quantitatively comparable to published results measured by FAIR [14] or SSCE [15] (Fig.3C). Moreover, our GBM study with DRC modeling was able to demonstrate the effective treatment of Etoposide to restrict the proliferation of GBM cells in mice (Fig.4), as previously reported [6][7][8][9]. We also replicated the previous result stating that rCBV was the hemodynamic parameter most sensitive to GBM proliferation [16].

Discussion

Our study presents a novel DRC-MRI protocol to generate high-resolution hemodynamic mapping in both WT and tumor mice. We have observed that changes in hemodynamics are reflective of the therapeutic treatment, and this observation demonstrates the potential of DRC-MRI in predicting the therapy response at an early time point in GBM mouse models.

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Seed Grant Program and Technical Development Grant Program and Matheson Foundation (UR010590). This study was performed at the Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute MRI Platform, a shared resource.

References

[1] Brem, S. & Abdullah, K. Glioblastoma. (Elsevier, 2017).

[2] Zhao, H-F., Wang, J., Shao, W., Wu, C-P., Chen, Z-P., To, S-S. & Li, W-P. Recent advances in the use of PI3K inhibitors for glioblastoma multiforme: current preclinical and clinical development. Molecular Cancer 16, (2017).

[3] King, G., Muhammad, G., Curtin, J., Barcia, C., Puntel, M., Liu, C., Honig, S., Candolfi, M., Mondkar, S., Lowenstein, P. & CastroGene, M. Eradication of Multifocal Glioma in a Syngeneic Glioblastoma Multiforme with Ad-Flt3L and Ad-HSV1-TK. Molecular Therapy 15, (2007).

[4] Idbaih, A., Erbs, P., Foloppe, J., Chneiweiss, H., Kempf, J., Homerin, M., Schmitt, C., Them, L. & Delattre, J-Y. TG6002: A novel oncolytic and vectorized gene pro-drug therapy approach to treat glioblastoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology 35, (2017).

[5] Shergalis, A., Bankhead, A., Luesakul, U., Muangsin, N. & Neamati, N. Current Challenges and Opportunities in Treating Glioblastoma. Pharmacol Rev 70, 412–445 (2018).

[6] Kuo, Y-C. & Wang, I-H. Using catanionic solid lipid nanoparticles with wheat germ agglutinin and lactoferrin for targeted delivery of etoposide to glioblastoma multiforme. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers 77, 73–82 (2017).

[7] Sevim, H., Parkinson, J. & McDonald, K. Etoposide-mediated glioblastoma cell death: dependent or independent on the expression of its target, topoisomerase II alpha? Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 137, 1705–1712 (2011).

[8] Kuo, Y-C., Chang, Y-H. & Rajesh, R. Targeted delivery of etoposide, carmustine and doxorubicin to human glioblastoma cells using methoxy poly (ethylene glycol) poly (ε caprolactone) nanoparticles conjugated with wheat germ agglutinin and folic acid. Materials Science and Engineering 96, 114–128 (2019).

[9] Mehta, A., Awah, C. U. & Sonabend, A. M. Topoisomerase II Poisons for Glioblastoma; Existing Challenges and Opportunities to Personalize Therapy. Frontiers in Neurology 9, (2018).

[10] López-Larrubia, P. Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI in Small Animals. Preclinical MRI Methods in Molecular Biology 41–57 (2018).

[11] Varallyay, C., Nesbit, E., Fu, R., Gahramanov, S., Moloney, B., Earl, E., Muldoon, L., Li, X., Rooney, W. & Neuwelt, E. High-Resolution Steady-State Cerebral Blood Volume Maps in Patients with Central Nervous System Neoplasms Using Ferumoxytol, a Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticle. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 33, 780–786 (2013).

[12] Brown, T., Small, S., Hua, F. & Moreno, H. Longitudinal mapping of mouse cerebral blood volume with MRI. NMR in Biomedicine 19, 535–543 (2006).

[13] Meier, P. & Zierler, K. L. On the Theory of the Indicator-Dilution Method for Measurement of Blood Flow and Volume. Journal of Applied Physiology 6, 731–744 (1954).

[14] I. A. Arnoldussen, V. Zerbi, M. Wiesmann, R. H. Noordman, S. Bolijn, M. P. Mutsaers, P. J. Dederen, R. Kleemann, T. Kooistra, E. A. van Tol, G. Gross, M. H. Schoemaker, A. Heerschap, P. Y. Wielinga, and A. J. Kiliaan. Early intake of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids preserves brain structure and function in diet-induced obesity. J Nutr Biochem 30, 177-88 (2016).

[15] H. Moreno, F. Hua, T. Brown, and S. Small. Longitudinal mapping of mouse cerebral blood volume with MRI. NMR Biomed 19, 535-43 (2006).

[16] Neska-Matuszewska, M., Bladowska, J., Sąsiadek, M. & Zimny, A. Differentiation of glioblastoma multiforme, metastases and primary central nervous system lymphomas using multiparametric perfusion and diffusion MR imaging of a tumor core and a peritumoral zone-Searching for a practical approach. PLoS ONE.

Figures

Figure 1. Overview of the proposed DRC pipeline.

Figure 2. Modeling perfusion hemodynamics of simulated and in vivo data. Figure.2A-B represent simulated arterial input function (AIF) and concentration-time-course (CTC) we typically observed in the DSC study, and Fig2.C is the CBF-scaled tissue residue function (TRF). D-I. Simulated AIF, CTC and CBF ∙ R. J-K. Simulated CBF Modeling. In panel K, the green line is the wash-in rate (WIR), which is mathematically equal to the derivative of CTC with respect to time. M. CBV and MTT Modeling.

Figure 3. (A) In Vivo CBF and CBV maps in healthy group derived by DRC-MRI protocol. (B) Test-retest ROI analysis of DRC-CBF and DRC-CBV. (C) Comparison CBF and CBV ROI results of DRC versus published data acquired by established FAIR and SSCE.

Figure 4. Comparison of Glioblastoma tumor-region statistics with and without Etoposide treatment. A. Volume rendering of two sample mice brains, one from each experimental group, with tumor regions segmented by k-means clustering highlighted. CBV maps are shown in the highlighted tumor regions. B - E. Quantitative measurements of increase in tumor size, cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV) and wash-in rate (WIR). B – E show that tumor progression significantly decreased with Etoposide treatment.

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 28 (2020)
2004