Yuhei Takado1, Maiko Ono2, Keiichiro Minatohara2, Masafumi Shimojo2, Nobuhiro Nitta2, Sayaka Shibata2, Naruhiko Sahara2, Ichio Aoki2, Masato Hasegawa3, and Makoto Higuchi2
1Department of Functional Brain Imaging Research, National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan, 2National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba, Japan, 3Dementia Research Project, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo, Japan
Synopsis
To develop therapeutic strategies, in vivo detection of the early
pathological changes in Parkinson’s disease is critically important. In this
work, we aimed to detect early pathological changes caused by the propagation
of α-synuclein in mouse brain using MRS. Recombinant α-synuclein and fibrils
were prepared and injected into C57BL6 mice. 8 weeks after the injection, glutamate
levels were decreased significantly compared to saline-injected control mice,
which was in accordance with decreased synapsin staining in the cortex. We demonstrated that MRS can detect synaptic
dysfunction caused by α-synuclein propagation in vivo.
Introduction
Parkinson's disease (PD) and related disorders are characterized by
filamentous structures consisting of abnormal α-synuclein in the brains. The propagation
of these pathologies is closely correlated with disease progression, and
synaptic dysfunction caused by these pathologies is considered to be an early event
during the disease progression1. To
develop therapeutic strategies, in vivo detection of the early pathological alterations
is critically important. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is a
non-invasive method that can detect neurotransmitters such as glutamate (Glu).
At the resting state under anesthesia, Glu levels measured by MRS (MRS-measured
Glu) are known to reflect synaptic densities in the pathological brains2. In
this work, we aimed to detect early pathological changes caused by accumulation
of α-synuclein in vivo using MRS. We hypothesized that MRS-measured Glu can detect
an early pathological change, namely synaptic dysfunction, in the α-synuclein accumulation
mouse model. Methods
Mouse Recombinant
mouse α-synuclein and fibrils were prepared as described previously3. 12 C57BL/6 wild type male mice
were used for this experiment (6 for α-synuclein injection, and 6 for saline
injection as control). Under anesthesia with ketamine hydrochloride (71.5
mg/kg, i.p.) and xylazine (14.5 mg/kg, i.p.), the animals were injected with 4 mL of 4 mg/mL mouse α-synuclein fibrils
into the bilateral cortex, consecutively. After the MRS measurements described
below, the brain was perfused with saline and fixed in 4% PFA in PBS. After cryo-protection
in PBS containing 20% sucrose, brains were embedded and frozen in OCT compound,
and 20-mm thick
sections were prepared by cryostat. Histological analysis:
Immunostaining was performed on scanned mice with NeuN and synapsin antibodies for
staining of neurons and presynapses, respectively.
MRI and 1H-MRS Both α-synuclein fibril- and saline-injected
mice were scanned twice by MRI, both before and 8 weeks after the injections.
For MRS measurements, the mice were anesthetized with 1–2% isoflurane and scanned
by a 7 T spectrometer (Biospec, AVANCE-III, Bruker Biospin) with a dual-channel
phased-array cooled surface coil for transmission and reception (cryoprobe©,
Bruker Biospin) using a PRESS sequence (TR/TE = 4000/20 ms). Two volume of
interests (VOIs) were localized in the right and left cortex. 256 acquisitions were
collected for each cortex. Using total creatine (tCr, the sum of phosphocreatine
(PCr) and Cr) signal as a reference, metabolite concentration ratios were
calculated using LCModel. In this work, we focused on Glu and total N-acetylaspartate
(tNAA, the sum of N-acetylaspartate and N-acetylaspartylglutamate) to test our
hypothesis.
Statistical
analyses Results were presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. For
multiple group comparisons, one-way ANOVA was performed, followed by Fisher’s
least significant difference post-hoc test.Results
Eight weeks after
the injection of α-synuclein
fibrils, the levels of Glu/tCr were
reduced significantly compared to saline-injected mice. There was also
significant decrease of tNAA in the α-synuclein fibril-injected mice compared to saline-injected
mice. Histological analysis indicated that α-synuclein deposition was propagated from the injected
site to the neighboring regions. Synapsin staining demonstrated that
presynapses were damaged by α-synuclein accumulation. NeuN staining did not show evidence of neuronal loss,
which is in accordance with the currently proposed pathophysiological claim
that synaptic dysfunction precedes neurodegeneration1.Discussion
In this work, we investigated whether MRS-measured Glu detects
synaptic dysfunction caused by pathological α-synuclein accumulation in mouse brain. MRS-measured
Glu levels were significantly decreased compared to control mice, suggesting
that synaptic dysfunction leads to decreased Glu levels in presynaptic sites.
Histological analysis was in agreement with this interpretation, since synapsin
protein exists mainly at presynaptic terminals4. No
evidence of NeuN alterations suggests that neuronal loss has not appeared at
this stage. Decreased tNAA levels without evident neuronal loss confirmed by histological
analysis may indicate that axonal impairments contributed to the decrease of
tNAA, since tNAA is known to exist not only in soma but also in axons5.
Mitochondrial dysfunction may also be a potential mechanism of decreased tNAA. Conclusion
We demonstrated that MRS can detect synaptic
dysfunction caused by pathological α-synuclein
accumulation in vivo. This method using MRS would be valuable for evaluating
therapeutic efficacies of various potential drugs to develop therapeutic
strategies for α-synucleinopathies
such as Parkinson’s disease and other related disorders.Acknowledgements
We acknowledge Ms. Shoko Uchida, Mr. Takahiro Shimizu, Mr. Takeharu Minamihisamatsu and other colleagues for valuable help for our experiments.References
1. Frontiers in neuroscience 2018;12:80. 2.
NeuroImage 2014;101:185-192. 3. Acta neuropathologica communications 2014;2:88.
4. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for
Neuroscience 2004;24:3711-3720. 5. Progress in neurobiology 2007;81:89-131.