Zhe Liu1, Wenxin Xue1, Xiaotong Liu2, Ting Liang1, Chao Jin1, Xiaocheng Wei3, Buyue Qian2, and Jian Yang1
1The first affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China, 2Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China, 3MR Research China, GE Healthcare,, Xi'an, China
Synopsis
Glioblastoma and
brain solitary metastasis from lung cancer have similar peritumoral edema on T2-weighted
imaging (T2WI). However, indistinguishable signs between these two tumors embarrass
the radiologists and lead to high misdiagnosis rate. To address such issue, radiomics
biomarkers were analyzed to detail the tumors’ histologic and morphologic
characteristics. Results indicated that radiomics biomarkers including histogram
of oriented gradient, shape and grey level co-occurrence matrix, which
charaterize the lesion’s shape and signal showed good performance in
differentiating these two tumors. Furthermore, using those radiomics
biomarkers, a gradient-boosting machine learning model was established and showed
good performance (Area under the curve=0.88).
Introduction
Glioblastoma is the most common primary malignant tumor of the brain [1].
Brain metastases are a frequent complication in patients with lung cancer and a
significant cause of morbidity and mortality[2]. Differentiation of the two
neoplasms is clinically crucial for prescribing the patients’ management and
assessing the prognosis[3], especially for the brain solitary lesion. However,
indistinguishable signs between two tumors on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) always
embarrass the radiologists and thus lead to high misdiagnosis rate, such as peritumoral
edema[4]. Previous studies reported that the peritumoral edema of the two
tumors was different in some functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
analysis. However, few studies reported the radiomics biomarker between the two
tumors using T2WI. To address such issue, we extracted and analyzed series of T2WI
radiomics features to detail the tumors’ histologic and morphologic
characteristics. In addition, a gradient-boosting (GDBT) machine learning was
used to serve for distinguishing the two tumors by the radiomics biomarkers.Methods
From
May 2015 to May 2018, 37 patients who underwent T2WI were retrospectively
enrolled. Inclusion criteria: 1) pathologically confirmed newly diagnosed
gliomas; 2) pathologically or follow-up confirmed newly diagnosed brain
metastasis; 3) availability of diagnostic-quality preoperative MR images with obvious
brain tumor.
The region of
interest (ROI) of tumor segmentation was manually performed using the ITK-SNAP
software (www.itk-snap.org) based on T2WI (Figure 1). A total of 155 radiomics
features including histogram of oriented gradient (HOG), first order, grey
level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM), gray level run length matrix (GLRLM), gray
level size zone matrix (GLSZM), gray level dependence matrix (GLDM) and shape features
were extracted from ROI on each slice[5-6]. Least absolute shrinkage and
selection operator (LASSO) was used for dimension reduction of radiomics
features. Multiple logistic regression (with stepwise forward) was used for
selecting the radiomics biomarkers. Based on the radiomics biomarkers, GDBT
machine learning model was established (70% data for training and 30% data for
testing) in distinguishing glioblastoma and brain solitary metastasis from lung
cancer. The area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used
to evaluate the diagnostic performance. Analyses were performed with R software
(version 3.6.0; http://www.r-project.org).Results
The
clinical characteristics of 37 patients (20 glioblastomas with 180 slices and 17
brain metastases with 130 slices) were summarized in Table 1. No significant
difference was found between two tumors for sex (P=0.731), while there was a significant difference for age (P=0.034).
The LASSO
regression showed that 29 features were significant important (Figure 2). Multiple
logistic regression indicated that the HOG (HOG-6, HOG-13 and HOG-15 features),
GLCM (contrast and difference variance features) and shape (roughness feature)
were significant radiomics biomarkers between glioblastoma and brain solitary
metastasis from lung cancer (Table 2).
Using the radiomics
biomarkers, the GBDT model showed good performance (Figure 3).Discussion
In
this study, based on 155 radiomics features of T2WI detailing tumor pathology, we
found that HOG, GLCM and shape features were significant important radiomics
biomarkers for differentiating glioblastoma and brain solitary metastasis from
lung cancer. Using those radiomics biomarkers, the GBDT model showed good
diagnostic performance. This suggest the
potential role of this method in clinical tumor diagnosis.
Differently from brain solitary metastasis, glima presented
peritumoral T2 prolongation on T2WI due to vasogenic edema and tumor
infiltration [7]. In addition, shape of these two tumors showed remarkable
difference. In detail, shape of glioma is complex, while brain solitary metastasis
expands more homogeneously like a sphere [8]. Therefore, T2WI texture features may
assisst the differentiation of the two tumors by quantifying the tumor’s
pathologic characteristics. Previous studies has showed that the shape features
may contribute to the distinguish ability between those two tumors[8]. The
results of this study were also consistent with previous study. In addition,
this study also found that GLCM and HOG also showed great potential for
distinguishing the two tumors, which indicating the signal of the peritumoral
edema was significant different. Finally, using those T2WI radiomics biomarkers,
the GBDT model showed good diagnostic performance, which further confirming the
importance of incorporating features to guide clinical applications. This result
further indicated that it is convenient for some high-risk group patients (such
as MR contrast agent allergy patients, pregnant women or infants) to use this
model.Conclusion
This study indicated that the HOG, shape and GLCM
features were the most important biomarkers for evaluating the T2WI differences
between glioblastoma
and brain solitary metastasis from lung cancer. The GBDT model based on the
radiomics biomarker may provide an alternative way to assist the radiologists’
burdensome works in clinical practice.Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the National Key
Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0100300), National Natural
Science Foundation of China (81471631, 81771810 and 51706178), the 2011 New
Century Excellent Talent Support Plan of the Ministry of Education, China
(NCET-11-0438) and the Clinical Research Award of the First Affiliated Hospital
of Xi’an Jiaotong University (XJTU1AF-CRF-2015-004).References
1.
Komori T. The 2016 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system:
the major points of revision[J]. Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2017, 57(7):
301-311.
2.
Yamanaka R. Medical management of brain metastases from lung cancer[J].
Oncology reports, 2009, 22(6): 1269-1276.
3.
Giese A, Westphal M. Treatment of malignant glioma: a problem beyond the
margins of resection. Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2001,
127(4): 217-225.
4.
Bauer A H, Erly W, Moser F G, et al. Differentiation of solitary brain
metastasis from glioblastoma multiforme: a predictive multiparametric approach
using combined MR diffusion and perfusion[J]. Neuroradiology, 2015, 57(7):
697-703.
5.
Van Griethuysen J J M, Fedorov A, Parmar C, et al. Computational radiomics
system to decode the radiographic phenotype[J]. Cancer research, 2017, 77(21):
e104-e107.
6.
Dalal N, Triggs B. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection[C].
IEEE. 2005. DOI : 10.1109/CVPR.2005.177.
7.
Stummer W. Mechanisms of tumor-related brain
edema[J]. Neurosurgical focus, 2007, 22(5): 1-7.
8. Blanchet L, Krooshof P W T, Postma G J, et al.
Discrimination between metastasis and glioblastoma multiforme based on
morphometric analysis of MR images[J]. American journal of neuroradiology,
2011, 32(1): 67-73.