Chia-Feng Lu1, Cheng-Chia Lee2,3,4, Hsiu-Mei Wu3,5, Huai-Che Yang2,3, Man-Chin Chen1, Chung-Jung Lin3,5, Wan-Yuo Guo3,5, and Wen-Yuh Chung2,3
1Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, 2Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, 3School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, 4Brain Research Center, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, 5Department of Radiology, Taipei Veteran General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
Synopsis
Even though the gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) shows promising evidence
in treating cavernous malformation (CM), there are still a part of patients
will have a recurrent hemorrhage after radiosurgery. We proposed a prediction
model based on preradiosurgical MR radiomics to estimate the personalized hemorrhage
free survival after GKRS. The satisfactory results of the proposed model can benefit
the healthcare in patients with CM by providing a reliable prognosis before
treatment.
Background and Purpose
Cavernous malformation (CM) is a neurovascular disease that most
patients may be asymptomatic in the early stage but with a high-risk occurrence
of intracranial hemorrhage, seizures, and headache. In clinical practice, CM is
mostly treated by the neurosurgery or gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS). Compared
with the resection surgery, GKRS is a lower risk treatment and more efficient
for the lesion located in the deep brain and brainstem with a faster
postoperative recovery.1 However, around 20 to 30% patients may still
suffer from the recurrent hemorrhage after GKRS.2 In this study, we
aim to determine whether the clinical MR characteristics quantified by
radiomics analysis before GKRS can be used to predict the hemorrhage free
survival (HFS) after radiosurgery in patients with CM.Materials and Methods
This study was approved by the local Institutional Review
Board. A dataset of 212 patients with CM treated by GKRS were retrospectively
collected from Taipei Veteran General Hospital. The preradiosurgical MRI data,
including postcontrast T1-weighted images (T1+C), T2-weighted images (T2W), and
T1-weighted images (T1W), were acquired by using a 1.5-T MR scanner (Signa
Horizon LX2, GE Medical Systems) for GKRS treatment planning. Continuous clinical
and imaging follow-ups were also collected, and 66 of 212 patients were
recorded with hemorrhage recurrence after GKRS (mean of HFS = 33.5 months).
Several postprocessing steps on the MRIs were applied to improve
the reliability of radiomics analysis. The adjustment of image resolution was
first performed to resample all voxel size to 0.50 x 0.50 x 3.00 mm3.
The T2W and T1W images were then registered to the subject’s T1+C images
followed by the image intensity normalization to transform MR imaging intensity
into standardized ranges (Figure 1b).
Two sets of lesion ROIs, including the target volume (TV) of CM for GKRS and
the surrounding hemosiderin (SH) rim, were delineated by experienced
neuroradiologists and researchers (Figure
1c).
Overall 3526 radiomic features of TV and SH, including histogram,
shape/size, and texture features, with wavelet image decomposition were
extracted from T1+C, T1W, and T2W images by using the MR Radiomics Platform (Figure 1d).3,4 A machine
learning model, Random Survival Forest, was constructed to predict the HFS
curve using the MR radiomics as predictors.5 The most informative
predictors (159 radiomic features) were selected based on the minimal depth of
the decision trees. The patient dataset was than randomly partitioned into two
subsets, 80% for training prediction model (170 patients) and 20% for model
validation (42 patients). Model performance was evaluated using the time-dependent area under the receiver
operator characteristics curves (AUC) with an anticipated value larger than 0.80.Results and Discussion
Table 1 lists the clinical characteristics of the
recruited 212 patients with CM. The profiles of selected radiomic features showed
that both TV- (59.1% of features) and SH-related (40.9% of features) MR
radiomics were critical for the HFS prediction (Figure 2). This result
suggested that the image traits of SH areas should also be considered which
were often ignored in clinical practice. The radiomic types of histogram and
texture features (reflecting image inhomogeneity) were the main contributors to
the prediction model rather than the size and shape features of the CM (Figure
2). Based on the trained Random Survival Forest model, personalized HFS predictions on the
validation dataset can be estimated (gray curves in Figure 3a). The
predicted HFS curves for 3 representative patients are in concordance with
their actual HFS (color curves in Figure 3a). A higher predicted
probability of HFS at a given time point indicated a lower probability for the occurrence
of hemorrhage. Furthermore, it was noted that a 0.75 threshold of predicted
probability of HFS can be used to predict the potential time point of hemorrhage
occurrence. For the 3 representative patients, the predicted time points for hemorrhage
based on the 0.75 threshold were 69.9, 25.3, and 9.1 months, while the actual
HFS were 61.1, 26.6, and 8.3 months, respectively (Figure 3a). The area
under the receiver operating curves (AUC) at different time points after GKRS were
between 0.73 and 0.95, suggesting the satisfactory prediction accuracy for the
HFS after GKRS based on the preradiosurgical MR radiomics (Figure 3b).Conclusions
The established prediction model based on MR radiomics
extracted from both TV and SH regions of CM can satisfactorily predict the HFS after GKRS.
This approach can be used to promote the personalized medicine of prognosis and
treatment strategy in CM. An independent dataset should be applied to further confirm
the efficacy of proposed approach.Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Ministry of Science and
Technology, Taiwan (MOST 106-2221-E-010-016-MY3, MOST 108-2321-B-010-012-MY2). References
1. Wang P, Zhang F,
Zhang H, Zhao H. Gamma knife radiosurgery for intracranial cavernous
malformations. Clinical neurology and neurosurgery. 2010 Jul 1;112(6):474-7.
2. Shih YH, Pan DH.
Management of supratentorial cavernous malformations: craniotomy versus
gammaknife radiosurgery. Clinical neurology and neurosurgery. 2005 Feb 1;107(2):108-12.
3. Aerts HJ,
Velazquez ER, Leijenaar RT, Parmar C, Grossmann P, Carvalho S, Bussink J,
Monshouwer R, Haibe-Kains B, Rietveld D, Hoebers F. Decoding tumour phenotype
by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nature
communications. 2014 Jun 3;5:4006.
4. Lu CF, Hsu FT,
Hsieh KL, Kao YC, Cheng SJ, Hsu JB, Tsai PH, Chen RJ, Huang CC, Yen Y, Chen CY.
Machine learning–based radiomics for molecular subtyping of gliomas. Clinical
Cancer Research. 2018 Sep 15;24(18):4429-36.
5. Ishwaran H,
Kogalur UB, Blackstone EH, Lauer MS. Random survival forests. The annals of
applied statistics. 2008;2(3):841-60.