Abhilasha Indoria1, Madhura Ingalhalikar2, and Jitender Saini1
1Neuroimaging and Interventional Radiology, NIMHANS, Bengaluru, India, 2Symbiosis Centre for Medical Image Analysis (SCMIA), Symbiosis International University, Pune, India
Synopsis
High grade extraventricular supratentorial
ependymoma’s in adults are uncommon neoplasms with imaging features that can mimic
cortical tumors if small and high-grade gliomas (HGG) if large. No previous
work has tried to discriminate ependymoma from high grade gliomas using MRI. Our
work evaluates preoperative diffusion weighted imaging for discrimination of
ependymomas from grade III and grade IV gliomas using textural analysis.
Results demonstrate significant differences in the histogram and first order
textural features derived from diffusion weighted imaging in cases of
ependymomas and high-grade gliomas.
INTRODUCTION
Supra-tentorial extraventricular ependymomas
constitute a rare form of adult intracranial tumors and show imaging features
similar to those of cortical tumors and high-grade gliomas namely anaplastic
astrocytomas or glioblastomas [1, 2]. This is especially true for the cerebral extra-ventricular
ependymomas as the location of the neoplasm does not support the diagnosis
because of their relative rarity. Advanced MRI methods like Diffusion weighted
imaging (DWI), perfusion MRI and MRS shows imaging features of ependymoma
simulate malignant gliomas like restricted diffusion within the solid tumor and
elevated choline on MRS indicating high cellularity and increased CBV on
perfusion MRI suggestive of neoangiogenesis. All these features make discrimination of
ependymoma difficult from high grade gliomas. [3, 4]. Treatment strategy and
prognosis of ependymomas differs significantly and a standard course of
management including radiation and chemotherapy in case of ependymomas is unclear
[2, 5]. It is therefore important to predict the tumor type preoperatively using
imaging, thus helping in prognostication and optimizing the treatment planning
and efficacy. This study aims to discriminate
supratentorial ependymomas using an underlying radiomics signature derived from
diffusion weighted imaging from high grade gliomas.METHOD
This retrospective study included
17 Ependymomas (age 21±11 years, 8 Females) and 41 HGG [21(grade-III and 20
grade-IV), (age 45±13 years, 18 Females)] patients, classified with tumor
histopathological characterization done using WHO 2016 classification. MRI data
included diffusion weighted MRI performed on 3T MR scanner (Philips Achieva)
using a 15-channel head coil, 3T MRI (Siemens Skyra) and 1.5T (Siemens Aera)
using 20 channel and 8 channel coils respectively. Data was acquired with TR
3000 ms, TE 73 ms, Voxel Size 2x2x4, b-values 0 and 1000 on 3T Philips scanner
and TR 3800 ms, TE 83 ms, Voxel Size 2x2x5, b-values 0 and 1000 for Siemens
scanner. Image processing and quantitative analysis of MRI data were performed
using 3D Slicer, PyRadiomics and Voting Classifier from SKLEARN [6].
Tumor masks
generation and intensity thresholding was performed on ADC maps of HGG and ependymoma
using segmentation wizard extension of 3D slicer version 4.10.2 (Figure1). Segmentation was cross validated by an experienced neuroradiologist. Total 42 features (18 first order features
and 24 GLCM features) were extracted using PyRadiomics open source
python package after z-score normalization of the original ADC maps. The obtained
data was scaled using StandardScaler. Scaled data was divided into training set
(52 training examples) and holdout set (6 examples). Feature importance was
calculated on the training dataset using ExtraTreeClassifier from sklearn (Figure2).
Principal component analysis (PCA) was used for reducing the dimensions of the
training data. Following five estimators were trained- Support Vector Machine,
Gradient Boosting Classifier, XGBoost Classifier, Logistic Regression and
Bagging Classifier. Hyper parameters of these estimators were tuned using four-fold
Grid Search CV. These estimators with tuned parameters were combined using a voting
classifier. Four- fold Cross validation was done using cross_validate module of
sklearn. Best estimator returned from cross validate instance was used as the
final model (Figure3). RESULTS
69.23% cross
validation accuracy and 0.573 cross validation ROC AUC score were obtained. Final
model prediction on holdout dataset yielded 83.33% accuracy with 0.166 mean
squared error and 0.777 F1 score. The top ranked textural features for
discrimination included – skewness, 10th Percentile, Minimum,
Median, Cluster Tendency, glcm-idm and glcm-imc1. Since the dataset was small
and number of features were comparable to the size of the data some kind of
dimensionality reduction technique was needed to avoid overfitting on the data.
Even after reducing dimensionality the performance of individual estimator was
not satisfactory so Voting classifier was used to combine the predictions from
individual (Weak Classifiers) to obtain a strong classifier. DISCUSSION
In the
current study we investigated textural features of supratentorial
extraventricular ependymomas and compared them with high grade gliomas.
Supratentorial ependymomas are rare neoplasms and only a few case series have
been described in the literature. As these tumors resemble high grade neoplasms
and their management strategies are unclear it is clinically relevant to
discriminate them from high grade gliomas. In the current study we found
textural features derived from DWI images useful for discriminating them from
high grade gliomas. Our diffusion MRI based image classifier was able to
discriminate these rare neoplasms from commonly occurring high grade gliomas. Important
limitation of the current study is small number of subjects however due to
relative rarity of supratentorial ependymomas it is very difficult to
accumulate large numbers of these neoplasms. It is important to incorporate the
imaging features of these neoplasms in the image classifier algorithms as they do
not have characteristic imaging features and are histologically and
prognostically distinct entity.CONCLUSION
High grade supratentorial
ependymoma’s in adults can be differentiated from high grade gliomas using
textural features and machine learning algorithm can be used to classify HGG
and ependymoma with decent accuracy.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Leng, X., et al.,
Magnetic resonance imaging findings of
extraventricular anaplastic ependymoma: A report of 11 cases. Oncol Lett,
2016. 12(3): p. 2048-2054.
2. Byun, J., et al.,
Supratentorial Extraventricular
Ependymoma: Retrospective Analysis of 15 Patients at a Single Institution.
World Neurosurg, 2018. 118: p.
e1-e9.
3. Wu, J., T.S.
Armstrong, and M.R. Gilbert, Biology and
management of ependymomas. Neuro Oncol, 2016. 18(7): p. 902-13.
4. Shintaku, M. and
K. Hashimoto, Anaplastic ependymoma
simulating glioblastoma in the cerebrum of an adult. Brain Tumor Pathol,
2012. 29(1): p. 31-6.
5. Ruda, R., et al.,
EANO guidelines for the diagnosis and
treatment of ependymal tumors. Neuro Oncol, 2018. 20(4): p. 445-456.
6. Pedregosa, F., et
al., Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python.
Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2011. 2011(12): p. 2825-2830.