Ken-Pin Hwang1, Xinzeng Wang2, Marc Lebel2, Peter Johansson3, Catharina Petersen3, Marcel Warntjes3, Ersin Bayram2, Suchandriam Banerjee2, Jingfei Ma1, and Jason M Johnson4
1Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States, 2MR Applications and Workflow, GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, United States, 3SyntheticMR, Linkoping, Sweden, 4Department of Radiology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
Synopsis
Images from a multiparameter mapping sequence were
reconstructed with a novel deep learning based reconstruction (DL Recon) method
trained to remove noise and enhance edges. Mean T1, T2, and PD values as
measured in a system phantom differed by less than 0.6% between the DL and
conventional reconstructions, while noise was lower in all measurements on DL Recon
images. In vivo synthetic images also exhibited reduced noise and increased
definition of structures. We find that the SNR and resolution benefits of DL
Recon applied to raw MR data extend to improve the fitted relaxation maps and
subsequent synthetic images.
Introduction
Deep learning based image reconstruction (DL Recon) offers
the potential for increased SNR, reduced artifacts, and enhanced
resolution. However, it is unclear if DL
Recon affects the quantitative multiparameter mapping in synthetic MR imaging
methods, by which multiple images are acquired with varying sequence parameters
and then fitted or matched to spin models to produce maps of T1 and T2 relaxation
times and proton density, PD. In this work, we investigate the effect of a DL
Recon on the accuracy of multiparameter mapping by a clinically available synthetic
imaging technique of Magnetic Resonance Image Compilation (MAGIC) [1].Methods
The DL Recon used in our study is a deep convolutional residual
encoder network trained to reconstruct images from 2D MR data with reduced
noise, reduced Gibbs ringing, and enhanced resolution. The network has an
adjustable parameter that ranges between 0 and 100% to control the noise level of
the final reconstructed images.
We scanned the NIST / ISMRM system standard phantom (Model
130, QalibreMD, Boulder, CO) [2] with the MAGIC pulse sequence using an HNU
coil on a 3T scanner (MR750, GE Healthcare, Waueksha, WI). Sequence parameters
were matrix = 320x256, FOV = 22cm, thickness/gap =4mm/1mm, ETL=16, bandwidth = ±83.33kHz,
TR=4000msec, ASSET acceleration factor=2. A total of 35 slices were acquired,
including three of the slices placed through the centers of each ring of T1,
T2, and PD reference spheres. Six human subjects were also acquired with
similar parameters except thickness = 5mm, ETL = 12, bandwidth = ±20.83kHz,
TR=4000-5000msec. In addition to all the standard images that were
automatically generated with conventional reconstruction, the raw data of these
phantom and in vivo scans were saved and reconstructed with DL Recon at 75% noise
reduction level. Images by conventional reconstruction and DL Recon were
processed offline with a dedicated mapping and image synthesis application (SyMRI,
SyntheticMR, Linkoping, Sweden) to produce T1, T2, and PD parameter maps, as
well as T1 and T2 weighted synthetic images. On the system phantom, ROI’s were
drawn inside the reference spheres and analyzed for mean and standard
deviation. In vivo images were qualitatively assessed for SNR and artifacts.Results
With DL Recon, normalized standard deviation decreased
within each ROI except for the first PD sphere, which contained the lowest
proton density. The percent difference of mean values between the two
reconstructions differed by less than 1.7% for the T1 spheres within the range
of 300-4000 ms and 2.3 percent for the T2 spheres within the range of 20 – 2000
ms. The greatest differences were observed at the longest relaxation times;
when restricted to T1 ≤ 984 msec and T2 ≤ 194 msec, the means differed by less
than 0.6%. Proton density of the first sphere differed dramatically, by over
42%, but by less than 3% for other spheres. Synthesized in-vivo images were noted
to have less noise and sharper resolution with DL Recon when compared to
conventional reconstruction.Discussion
Our study showed that DL Recon resulted in the expected
benefits of reduced noise and image enhancement when applied to the raw data of
the MAGIC sequence and did not lead to any bias or undesired scaling of the
fitted relaxation parameters. DL Recon also had little or no effect on other
image quality metrics such as shading or presence of artifact. We therefore conclude that DL recon can be
advantageously applied to the synthetic imaging techniques such as MAGIC.
In general, all values in the reference spheres were
unaffected (difference less than 0.6%) except for very long or very short
relaxation values that would not be representative of most clinically relevant
tissues. Since the sequence parameters in MAGIC are not optimized for these
extreme relaxation rates, small changes in signal would have a greater effect
in those regions, though difference in mean relaxation values never varied
greater than 1.7%. The large reduction in PD for the first reference sphere by
DL Recon may be explained by the fact that the sphere contains only 5% density
of water and the noise would introduce a bias in conventionally reconstructed
magnitude images. Image filtering or smoothing on magnitude images would not be
expected to correct bias created by Rician noise. However, DL Recon operates directly
on complex raw data and could potentially reduce this bias in the
reconstruction process.
We note that the total scan time was less than 6 minutes for
30 slices in our clinical MAGIC protocol, and the technique produces relaxation
maps as well as synthetic images with multiple image contrasts. With DL Recon, it
is possible to further reduce the scan time with little or no loss of image
quality. Acknowledgements
Prototype DL Recon and support was provided by GE Healthcare. Prototype SyMRI software and support was provided by SyntheticMR.References
1.
Warntjes JB, Leinhard
OD, West J, Lundberg P. Rapid magnetic resonance quantification on the brain:
Optimization for clinical usage. Magn Reson Med. 2008 ; 60:320-9
2.
Kathryn E Keenan, Karl F Stupic, Michael A Boss,
Stephen E Russek, Thomas L Chenevert, Pottumarthi V Prasad, Wilburn E Reddick,
Jie Zheng, Peng Hu, Edward F Jackson. Comparison of T1 measurement using
ISMRM/NIST system phantom. Proc 24th ISMRM, #3290, 2016.