Lately, we have acquired the resting state fMRI (rs-fMRI) signal with pupillometry from anesthetized rats to investigate specific resting-state network correlations with brain state-specific pupil dynamics. Here we used the acquired data to estimate the instantaneous arousal index based on the rs-fMRI signal. We evaluated predicting pupil dynamics using three methods: linear regression (LR), gated recurrent unit (GRU) neural networks and a previously proposed correlation-based (CC) approach. LR and GRU provided much better predictions than CC method. Also, using weighted PCA components, we can identify specific regions of the brain related to pupil dynamics as the brain state index.
This research was supported by NIH Brain Initiative funding (RF1NS113278-01), and the S10 instrument grant (S10 RR023009-01) to Martinos Center, German Research Foundation (DFG) Yu215/3-1, BMBF 01GQ1702, and the internal funding from Max Planck Society. We thank Dr. N. Avdievitch and Ms. H. Schulz for technical support, Dr. E. Weiler, Ms. M. Pitscheider and Ms. S. Fischer for animal protocol and maintenance support, the teams of Mr. J. Boldt and Mr. O. Holder for mechanical and electrical support.
1. Wainstein, G., Rojas-Libano, D., Crossley, N.A., Carrasco, X., Aboitiz, F., and Ossandon, T. (2017). Pupil Size Tracks Attentional Performance In Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Sci Rep 7, 8228.
2. Eckstein, M.K., Guerra-Carrillo, B., Miller Singley, A.T., and Bunge, S.A. (2017). Beyond eye gaze: What else can eyetracking reveal about cognition and cognitive development? Dev Cogn Neurosci 25, 69-91.
3. Knapen, T., de Gee, J.W., Brascamp, J., Nuiten, S., Hoppenbrouwers, S., and Theeuwes, J. (2016). Cognitive and Ocular Factors Jointly Determine Pupil Responses under Equiluminance. PLoS One 11, e0155574.
4. Leuchs, L., Schneider, M., Czisch, M., and Spoormaker, V.I. (2017). Neural correlates of pupil dilation during human fear learning. Neuroimage 147, 186-197.
5. Chang, C., Leopold, D.A., Scholvinck, M.L., Mandelkow, H., Picchioni, D., Liu, X., Ye, F.Q., Turchi, J.N., and Duyn, J.H. (2016). Tracking brain arousal fluctuations with fMRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113, 4518-4523.
6. Unsworth, N., and Robison, M.K. (2018). Tracking arousal state and mind wandering with pupillometry. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 18, 638-664.
7. Reimer, J., Froudarakis, E., Cadwell, C.R., Yatsenko, D., Denfield, G.H., and Tolias, A.S. (2014). Pupil fluctuations track fast switching of cortical states during quiet wakefulness. Neuron 84, 355-362.
8. Siegle, G.J., Steinhauer, S.R., Stenger, V.A., Konecky, R., and Carter, C.S. (2003). Use of concurrent pupildilation assessment to inform interpretation and analysis of fMRI data. Neuroimage 20, 114-124.
9. Chang, C., Leopold, D.A., Scholvinck, M.L., Mandelkow, H., Picchioni, D., Liu, X., Ye, F.Q., Turchi, J.N., and Duyn, J.H. (2016). Tracking brain arousal fluctuations with fMRI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113, 4518-4523.
10. Pais-Roldan, P., Takahashi, K., Chen, Y., Zeng, H., Jiang, Y., Yu, X.; Max Planck Inst. For Biol. Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany. Simultaneous pupillometry, calcium recording and fMRI to track brain state changes in the rat. Program No. 613.03. 2019 Neuroscience Meeting Planner. Chicago, IL: Society for Neuroscience, 2019.
11. McGinley, M.J., David, S.V., McCormick, D.A., 2015. Cortical Membrane Potential Signature of Optimal States for Sensory Signal Detection. Neuron 87, 179–192.
12. Mathis, A., Mamidanna, P., Cury, K.M., Abe, T., Murthy, V.N., Mathis, M.W., Bethge, M., 2018. DeepLabCut: markerless pose estimation of user-defined body parts with deep learning. Nature Neuroscience 21, 1281.
13. Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., Bengio, Y., 2014. Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation. arXiv:1406.1078.
14. Bergstra, J., Bardenet, R., Bengio, Y., Kegl, B., 2011. Algorithms for hyper-parameter optimization, in: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. Curran Associates Inc., Granada, Spain, pp. 2546–2554.
Fig. 1. Multi-modal data acquisition platform
rs-fMRI data acquisition is accompanied by simultaneous monitoring of the rat eye. Pupil diameter is extracted from each video frame using the DeepLabCut toolbox.
Fig. 2. Prediction results
A. GRU predictions obtained the best scores (0.40±0.03; mean±SE; pLR=0.0001; pCC=1.20*10-6). Linear regression performed better (0.38±0.03; mean±SE; p=1.13*10-5) than the CC template-based estimation (0.29±0.03; mean±SE).
BC. Example predictions of two trials. Blue traces show original pupil signals. Orange traces show predictions generated by each of the methods. Linear regression generates predictions similar to GRU's but noisier. The signals were variance normalized.
Fig. 4. LR and CC templates
After training the linear regression model, all of the 300 PCA spatial maps were multiplied by their corresponding linear regression weights and summed together. The resulting map (A) highlights areas that contributed to predictions. A pattern distinct from the CC template (B) was observed.