Jessica Archibald1,2, Erin L MacMillan3,4,5, Carina Graf2,6, Piotr Kozlowski2,7,8, Cornelia Laule2,9,10, and John LK Kramer1,2,11
1Experimental Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 3Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 4Image Tech Lab, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 5Philips Healthcare Canada, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 6Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 7Radiology, University of British Columbia, vancouver, BC, Canada, 8UBC MRI Research Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 9Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, vancouver, BC, Canada, 10Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 11School of Kinesiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Synopsis
Current treatment evaluation procedures of pain conditions are dependent
on self-reported measures. The objective of this study was to determine changes
in excitatory neurotransmitters (i.e., glutamate and glutamate+glutamine) in
the anterior cingulate cortex as an objective measure of pain during a painful
stimulus using single voxel functional magnetic resonance spectroscopy (fMRS).
Glutamate concentration changes during the painful stimulus suggest a role for
glutamate in detecting pain which was not related to self-reported pain ratings.
An exploratory analysis on sex revealed an 8.63% (p=0.08) increase in glutamate
at pain onset in female participants compared with a 7.45% (p=0.31) increase in
males.
Introduction
Magnetic
resonance spectroscopy (MRS) can quantify brain metabolites including n-acetyl-aspartate
(NAA), total creatine (tCr), glutamate (Glu), and glutamate+glutamine (Glx). Functional MRS (fMRS) monitors metabolites over time, is
sensitive to task-related changes in neurotransmitters1–6 and can elucidate
neural mechanisms underlying information processing (i.e., sensory stimulation)1,4,6–10. fMRS studies examining changes
in metabolites in relation to painful stimulus in healthy subjects, have primarily focused on the anterior
cingulate cortex (ACC)1,2,7,11,12, an area active during pain stimulation and pain-relief interventions13–15. Our goal
was to examine the relationship between ACC metabolite
activity and pain perception in healthy controls using fMRS.
We hypothesize that increased Glu concentrations in the ACC (1) would occur in
relation to pain, and (2) are associated with pain ratings.Methods
MR
Experiments: Eighteen healthy participants (9F/9M, mean
age=26.2 SD=3.68, range=21-36yrs) were recruited. 3T data (Philips Achieva, transmit-receive head
coil) included:
(1) 3DT1 (MPRAGE, TE/TR/TI=3.5/7.7/808ms, shot interval=1800ms, 1mm³
isotropic resolution, FOV (ap/rl/fh)=256/200/150mm³)
(2) 1H-MRS (PRESS, TE/TR=22/4000ms, NSA=32, ACC voxel size=30/25/15mm3
=11.2mL, 2nd order shimming, 16-step phase cycle with water suppression
using the Excitation option– a Philips variant of CHESS16; a non-water suppressed acquisition preceded each
complete phase-cycle for absolute metabolite quantification4 and
water signal monitoring, Figure 1A)
(3) T2-weighted (TE/TR=90/2000ms, FOV (ap/rl/fh) =
250/189/36mm³, resolution=1x1x3 mm3).
Pain intervention: Capsaicin (0.075% topical) was applied on the
right forearm volar surface. After 8 minutes of “pre-heat” fMRS, a thermo-pad
was activated for 4.4 minutes by circulating ~41°C heated water (“heat”). fMRS
was acquired continuously during heat application and for 8 minutes after heat
(“post heat”) (Figure 2). During fMRS participants provided pain ratings every
2-minutes using the 0-10 numeric rating scale (NRS)17 via an MRI-compatible clicker .
Data
Analysis: 3DT1
data was segmented into white matter, gray matter and cerebrospinal fluid using
FSL BET and FAST18. Individual FIDs were pre-processed (eddy current
correction, frequency alignment, visual inspection) in MATLAB
(R2016b). 32 shots were averaged for
each 2-minute block, yielding a total of 11 spectra analyzed using LCModel
(v6.3-1H) (Figure 1B). The
corresponding interleaved non-water suppressed spectra and each participant’s
brain water tissue volume were used to calculate the concentration of NAA, tCr,
glutamate and Glx in millimolar (mM)19–22. Individual water FID’s were fitted to a single-exponential
decay curve to extrapolate the water amplitude.
Statistical Analysis: A paired t-test determined changes in metabolites at
the onset of self-reported pain. A linear mixed effects model determined the relationship between metabolites
(Glu,
Glx) and
pain ratings, including random slopes and intercepts. Sex-effect
was explored using Cohen’s d23 =
group mean difference/pooled standard deviation. Effect size quantifies the
difference between two groups where the size of the difference is emphasized
rather than confounding this with sample size (small effect: d=0.2, medium
effect: d=0.5, large effect: d=0.8). A Pearson correlation
assessed the relationship between water amplitude and metabolite concentrations.
All statistics were performed using R (v1.1.442).Results
One
participant (F) was unable to be scanned and 2 participants’ (1M/1F) data sets
were rejected due to motion. The 15 remaining subjects had very consistent high
signal to noise ratio and narrow line widths (Figure 3). Average reported pain ratings were 3.8±2.0 during heat and 4.2±1.9
post-heat.
Trends
of increased Glu (+8.38%, p=0.06, t=2.04), Glx (+7.81%, p=0.11, t=1.74)
and tCr (+6.0%, p=0.05, t=2.06)
were observed at pain onset relative to rest, with medium-large effects
(Cohen’s dGlu=0.74 CI=-0.05–1.55; Cohen’s dGlx=0.60
CI=-0.18–1.40; Cohen’s dtCr=
0.83 CI= 0.02-1.64). NAA showed
no change at pain onset compared to rest (2.81%, p=0.34, t=0.9, small effect Cohen’s
dNAA=0.28 CI=-0.49–1.05) (Figure 4).
Glu and Glx were not
significantly correlated with pain
ratings across the fMRS acquisition (Glu: ß±standard
error=0.017±0.06, p=0.79; Glx:
-0.004±0.13, p=0.97) (Figure
5).
Exploratory sex-based analysis revealed large changes in Glu at pain onset in females (8.63%, p=0.08, t=2.1,Cohen’s dfemale=0.88,
CI=-0.43–2.21), compared to medium effects in males (7.45%, p=0.31, t=1.0, Cohen’s dmale=0.60
CI=-0.57–1.73), although pain ratings were not different between the groups (Figure 4). There was no relationship
between any metabolite (Glu, Glx, NAA, tCr) and water amplitude (r=0.11, p=0.63;r=-0.24
p=0.31; r=0.008, p=0.97; r=0.26, p=0.27, respectively).Discussion
The
relationship between ACC metabolite concentrations and noxious heat-derived
pain was examined using fMRS. At pain onset, trend-level increases with medium
to large effect sizes were detected for Glu, Glx and tCr, while NAA remained constant. The trend for Glu to increase during the
first perception of pain was higher in females, which may be related to the
effect of steroidal sex hormones on glutamate-glutamine metabolism in the brain24.
Increased tCr with pain perception may
indicate its role in neuromodulation25–27, since creatine and its precursor can
act as neuromodulators of GABAergic neurons25. Neither
Glu nor Glx levels were related to pain ratings over time, which may be due to
the transient nature of this increase and/or the subjective nature of
self-reported pain levels. The
lack of association between metabolite concentration and water amplitude
suggests changes in water did not drive changes in these concentrations. Conclusion
Functional MRS in the
anterior cingulate cortex demonstrated Glu, Glx and tCr
concentration increases during a pain stimulus which were not related to
self-reported pain ratings. Preliminary evidence suggests males and females experience
pain differently, which may be important to consider when developing novel
avenues for sex-specific treatments. Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the University
of British Columbia MRI Research Centre, the International Collaboration for
Repair Discoveries (ICORD) as well as volunteers who participated in the study.
J. Archibald is supported by a research
scholarship of the National Council of Science and Technology (CONACYT),
GSM-NSERC and the Michel Smith foreign study supplement (MSFSS). E.L MacMillan
receives salary support from Philips Canada.
CG is supported by an endMS Master’s
studentship award from the MS Society of Canada. CL holds operating grant
funding from the MS Society of Canada and the Natural Sciences and Engineering
Research Council of Canada (NSERC).
This work is supported by NSERC Program
Discovery grant held by JLKK.
References
1. Gussew,
A. et al. Time-resolved functional 1H MR spectroscopic detection of
glutamate concentration changes in the brain during acute heat pain
stimulation. Neuroimage 49, 1895–1902 (2010).
2. Cleve,
M., Gussew, A. & Reichenbach, J. R. In vivo detection of acute pain-induced
changes of GABA+ and Glx in the human brain by using functional 1H MEGA-PRESS
MR spectroscopy. Neuroimage 105, (2014).
3. Chiappelli,
J. et al. Glutamatergic Response to Heat Pain Stress in Schizophrenia. Schizophr.
Bull. 1–10 (2017). doi:10.1093/schbul/sbx133
4. Bednařík,
P. et al. Neurochemical and BOLD responses during neuronal activation
measured in the human visual cortex at 7 Tesla. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.
35, 601–610 (2015).
5. Apšvalka,
D., Gadie, A., Clemence, M. & Mullins, P. G. Event-related dynamics of
glutamate and BOLD effects measured using functional magnetic resonance
spectroscopy (fMRS) at 3T in a repetition suppression paradigm. Neuroimage
118, 292–300 (2015).
6. Mullins,
P. G. Towards a theory of functional magnetic resonance spectroscopy (fMRS): A
meta-analysis and discussion of using MRS to measure changes in
neurotransmitters in real time. Scand. J. Psychol. 59, 91–103
(2018).
7. Mullins,
P. G., Rowland, L. M., Jung, R. E. & Sibbitt, W. L. A novel technique to
study the brain’s response to pain: Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Neuroimage
26, 642–646 (2005).
8. Stanley,
J. A. & Raz, N. Functional magnetic resonance spectroscopy: The ‘new’ MRS
for cognitive neuroscience and psychiatry research. Front. Psychiatry 9,
(2018).
9. Taylor,
R. et al. Functional magnetic resonance spectroscopy of glutamate in
schizophrenia and major depressive disorder: anterior cingulate activity during
a color-word Stroop task. npj Schizophr. 1, 15028 (2015).
10. Cleve,
M., Gussew, A., Wagner, G., Bär, K. J. & Reichenbach, J. R. Assessment of
intra- and inter-regional interrelations between GABA+, Glx and BOLD during
pain perception in the human brain – A combined1H fMRS and fMRI study. Neuroscience
365, 125–136 (2017).
11. Kupers,
R., Danielsen, E. R., Kehlet, H., Christensen, R. & Thomsen, C. Painful
tonic heat stimulation induces GABA accumulation in the prefrontal cortex in
man. Pain 142, 89–93 (2009).
12. Zunhammer,
M. et al. Combined glutamate and glutamine levels in pain-processing
brain regions are associated with individual pain sensitivity. Pain 157,
1 (2016).
13. Casey,
K. L. et al. Selective opiate modulation of nociceptive processing in
the human brain. J. Neurophysiol. 84, 525–533 (2000).
14. Petrovic,
P., Kalso, E., Petersson, K. M. & Ingvar, M. Placebo and opioid analgesia -
Imaging a shared neuronal network. Science (80-. ). 295, 1737–1740
(2002).
15. deCharms,
R. C. et al. Control over brain activation and pain learned by using
real-time functional MRI. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102,
18626–31 (2005).
16. Haase,
A., Frahm, J., Hanicke, W. & Matthaei, D. 1H NMR chemical shift selective
(CHESS) imaging. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. (1985).
doi:10.1088/0031-9155/30/4/008
17. Hawker,
G. A., Mian, S., Kendzerska, T. & French, M. Measures of adult pain: Visual
Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain),
McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ),
Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS),
and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis
Care Res. 63, 240–252 (2011).
18. Zhang,
Y; Brady, M; Smith, S. Segmentation of brain MR images through a hidden Markov
random field model and the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans.
Med. Imaging 20, 45–57 (2001).
19. MacMillan,
E. L. et al. Progressive multiple sclerosis exhibits decreasing
glutamate and glutamine over two years. Mult. Scler. J. 22, 112–116
(2016).
20. Liang,
A. L. W. et al. Short-term stability of T 1 and T 2 relaxation measures
in multiple sclerosis normal appearing white matter. J. Neurol. 259,
1151–1158 (2012).
21. Laule,
C. et al. Long T2 water in multiple sclerosis: What else can we learn
from multi-echo T2 relaxation? J. Neurol. 254, 1579–1587 (2007).
22. de
Graaf, R. in vivo NMR Spectroscopy Principles and Techniques. (2007).
doi:10.1080/09297040802385400
23. Cohen,
J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge. ISBN
978-1-134-, (1988).
24. Haghighat,
N. Estrogen (17β-Estradiol) enhances glutamine synthetase activity in C6-glioma
cells. Neurochem. Res. 30, 661–667 (2005).
25. Koga,
Y. et al. Brain creatine functions to attenuate acute stress responses
through GABAnergic system in chicks. Neuroscience 132, 65–71
(2005).
26. Van
De Kamp, J. M., Jakobs, C., Gibson, K. M. & Salomons, G. S. New insights
into creatine transporter deficiency: The importance of recycling creatine in
the brain. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 36, 155–156 (2013).
27. Almeida,
L., Salomons, G., Hogenboom, F., Jakobs, C. & Schoffelmeer, A. Exocytotic
Release of Creatine in Rat Brain. Synapse 346, 319–346 (2006).