Soroush Heidari Pahlavian1,2, Xiaoming Bi3, Samantha Ma1,2, Helena Chui2, Danny J.J. Wang1,2, and Lirong Yan1,2
1USC Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 2Department of Neurology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 3Siemens Medical Solutions USA Inc., Los Angeles, CA, United States
Synopsis
The association between increased cerebrovascular risk
factors induced arterial stiffness, and age-related neurodegenerative disorders
has been demonstrated in multiple studies. In this study, we evaluated the utility
of single-slice two–dimensional (2D) phase-contrast MRI (PC-MRI) to assess arterial
stiffness by calculating the carotid pulse wave velocity (cPWV) along the common
carotid artery (CCA) and internal carotid arteries (ICA) within a single two-minute
scan. Our results demonstrated the feasibility of cPWV measurement using single-slice
2D PC-MRI and indicated a positive correlation between cPWV and arterial
damping factor. 2D PC-MRI-measured cPWV holds potential as biomarker to
quantify age-related alterations in arterial stiffness.
Introduction
As a surrogate marker of arterial stiffness, elevated pulse
wave velocity (PWV) is thought to be an important characteristic of vascular
aging/dysfunction in neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease
and dementia1,2,3.
While the utility of carotid-femoral PWV in quantifying
central vascular compliance has been studied in various cardiovascular
disorders, PWV measurement of cerebral arteries has not been investigated
extensively. A few studies attempted to assess cerebroarterial PWV by
collecting PC-MRI data at two arterial sites. However, the cardiac variations
between separate scans and strict requirements for coil placement have limited the
application of these techniques4. In this study, we proposed an
alternative approach to assess carotid PWV (cPWV) by simultaneously acquiring
flow velocity waveforms along the common carotid artery (CCA) and the internal
carotid artery (ICA) using single-slice 2D PC-MRI within a single scan. Methods
Participants and MR Imaging:
Nine healthy individuals (one female) aged between 23 and 75 years (35±15 years)
were recruited in this study. MRI experiments were performed on a Siemens
Prisma 3T Scanner using 20-channel head/neck coil.
One-stop-shop cPWV: Using
the 3D MR angiograms obtained from the quick (2 minutes) time-of-flight scan, an
oblique sagittal slice was selected to cover
the majority of CCA-ICA segment while avoiding overlaps with other vessels (Figure
1a). A single-slice ECG retrospective-gated 2D PC-MRI with a single in-plane
velocity encoding (CCA to ICC) was used to simultaneously acquire flow velocity
waveforms in CCA and ICC as shown in Figure 1b-d (resolution=1.0×1.0×4.0
mm3, VENC=80 cm/s, TE/TR=4.32/14.22 ms, TA=2min). Time-resolved three-dimensional PC-MRI (4D Flow) measurement was
carried out with the same vessel coverage as that in the 2D PC-MRI and was used
to calculate reference cPWV (resolution=1.0×1.0×5.0 mm3, TP/IP VENC=80/25
cm/s, TE/TR=2.64/10.44 ms, TA=12min).
cPWV
calculation: cPWV calculations were carried out using
an internally developed software written in MATLAB. First, the magnitude image
was used to generate a region of interest (ROI) mask (figure 1-b) and to
measure the vessel length through automatic tracing of the path along
the midline of the ROI. Averaged velocity waveforms at different axial locations
in the ROI were calculated and were smoothed using a Savitsky–Golay filter (Figure
1-d). Following normalization, the transit-time between waveforms were
calculated using time–to–foot (TTF) and middle area (MA) techniques5,6 (Figure 1-e). cPWV was expressed
as the inverse slope of a line fitted to the transit-time vs. distance along
the vessel (Figure 1-f). For MA technique, three different upslope fitting
ranges were chosen and studied. Additionally, the arterial dampening factor
(DF) was calculated as the ratio of the proximal (ICA) pulsatility index (PI)
to the distal (ICA) PI, where PI was defined as PI=(Qmax-Qmin)/Qmean with Qmean
being the mean flow rate (Figure 1-f).
The
test-retest repeatability of 2D PC-MRI–measured cPWV was assessed using Bland–Altman
analysis from six participants. To investigate the potential in-plane flow
saturation effects on PWV measurement, we applied different FAs (FA=10,15,20,25°)
in 2D PC-MRI and compared the PWV measurements with the reference PWV from 4D Flow. Results
The correlation coefficient and ICC between repeated PWV
measurements were 0.7 and 0.79, respectively, indicating good test-retest
reproducibility (Figure 2). cPWV with FA of 10° with the upslope
fitting range of [0.2, 0.8] showed the highest correlation coefficient and
slope of the linear regression with 4D Flow–measured cPWV values (Figure 3-a). cPWV
values obtained using TTF method were markedly larger than the ones obtained
using MA method (Figure 3-b). cPWV and DF were highly correlated after excluding
four outlier points from two subjects who presented extremely high DF values when
using higher FAs (Figure 4). Comparison of the youngest (23 y/o) and the oldest
(75 y/o) individuals among our participants revealed a substantially larger cPWV
in the older subject (Figure 5). Discussion
The results of this pilot study suggest the feasibility of one-stop-shop
cPWV approach to derive the propagation time and vessel length from a single 2D
PC-MRI scan. The reliability of PC-MRI–measured cPWV was well demonstrated through
the test-retest scans and comparison with 4D Flow measurements. Compared to 4D Flow,
the proposed approach offers much shorter scan time without sophisticated
postprocessing. The stronger correlation of cPWV between 2D PC-MRI and 4D Flow
at smaller FAs could be attributed to the reduced in-plane flow saturation
effects and the resulting increase in SNR.
The discrepancy observed between PWV values calculated using TTF and MA transit-time
quantification techniques is in agreement with previous reports7 and highlights the need for a
more detailed analysis to evaluate the impact of various MR sequence parameters
and post-processing techniques on PWV quantification. Future studies using flow
phantoms with known PWV can lead to a more comprehensive picture of the
MRI-based PWV calculation accuracy. Our preliminary data also show that cPWV is
highly correlated with arterial DF–another biomarker of arterial stiffness8 and that cPWV tends to be
larger in older subjects, suggesting that single-slice PC-MRI–measured cPWV could be
a potential imaging marker to assess cerebrovascular stiffness in aging and neurodegenerative
diseases.Conclusion
This study demonstrated the feasibility of carotid PWV
measurement using single-slice 2D PC-MRI, which could hold potential as a biomarker
of age-related alterations in cerebral arteries.Acknowledgements
This work is supported by grants of NIH K25-AG056594 and AHA
16SDG29630013.References
1. Callaghan, F., Geddes, L., Babbs, C.F.
& Bourland, J. Relationship between pulse-wave velocity and arterial
elasticity. Medical and Biological
Engineering and Computing 24,
248-254 (1986).
2. Gorelick, P., et al. American Heart Association
Stroke Council, Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, Council on
Cardiovascular Nursing, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention,
and Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia. Vascular contributions to
cognitive impairment and dementia: a statement for healthcare professionals
from the american heart association/american stroke association. Stroke 42, 2672-2713 (2011).
3. Shen, L., et al. Relationship between pulse wave
velocity and carotid atherosclerosis in geriatric people. Cerebrovascular Diseases 32,
16-20 (2011).
4. Rodgers, Z., et
al. Carotid pulse wave velocity
quantification with non-gated, velocity-encoded projections. in Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med 21 (2013).
5. Dogui, A., et al. Measurement of aortic arch
pulse wave velocity in cardiovascular MR: comparison of transit time estimators
and description of a new approach. Journal
of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 33,
1321-1329 (2011).
6. Chiu, Y.C.,
Arand, P.W., Shroff, S.G., Feldman, T. & Carroll, J.D. Determination of
pulse wave velocities with computerized algorithms. American heart journal 121,
1460-1470 (1991).
7. Ruesink, T.,
Medero, R., Rutkowski, D. & Roldán-Alzate, A. In vitro validation of 4D
flow MRI for local pulse wave velocity estimation. Cardiovascular engineering and technology 9, 674-687 (2018).
8. Schnerr, R.S., et al.
Pulsatility of Lenticulostriate Arteries Assessed by 7 Tesla Flow
MRI—Measurement, Reproducibility, and Applicability to Aging Effect. Front Physiol 8, 961 (2017).