Lijuan Wang1, Songan Shang1, Weiqiang Dou2, Jianxun Qu2, Jing Ye1, and Jingtao Wu1
1Northern Jiangsu People’s Hospital, Yangzhou, China, 2GE Healthcare, Beijing, China
Synopsis
In this study, we aimed to
investigate the feasibility of a hybrid arterial spin labeling (hASL) zero-echo-time
(zTE) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for intracranial arteries. Comparing with the conventional zTE MRA (continuous ASL, cASL), the hASL-zTE-MRA showed higher signal homogeneity in the proximal intracranial arteries. Additionally, hASL-zTE-MRA provided more robust performance in depicting
cerebrovascular diseases, such as
stenosis and arteriovenous malformation (AVM). We therefore demonstrated that the utilization of hASL
strategy could potentially improve the image quality of zTE-MRA, and further be
applied routinely in the clinic for patients with cerebrovascular diseases.
Introduction
Magnetic
resonance angiography (MRA) has
been proposed as a promising technique to image intracranial arteries[1]. In particular, zero-echo-time (zTE) MRA, integrated
with continuous ASL (cASL) and zTE readout strategy, is insensitive to
susceptibility distortion, superb artery selectivity, and silent[2]. One drawback of this technique however,
is the appearing of hollowing artifacts or flow void. Hybrid arterial spin labeling (hASL)-zTE MRA has demonstrated its
potential in depicting cerebrovascular [3]. Flow void effect was
eliminated in hASL-zTE-MRA via continuous inflow of tagged blood during readout.
However, whether this sequence is robust and validated in the diagnosis of cerebrovascular
diseases remains unclear.
Hence,
in this study, we aimed to investigate the
feasibility of hASL-zTE-MRA quantitatively and qualitatively in the characterization of intracranial arteries of healthy controls,
and reported several representative cases of cerebrovascular diseases.Materials and Methods
24
healthy volunteers (11 males & 9 females; 35.92±14.65
years) and 2 patients (a 25-y females and a 47-y males) suspected with
cerebrovascular disorders were recruited.
All
participants received cASL- and
hASL- zTE-MRA scanning randomly at the 3.0T GE Discovery 750w MR scanner. In
addition, computed tomography angiography (CTA) was also performed as a
reference for the cerebrovascular disorders.
For fair comparison, the total length of the ASL
labeling module was fixed among the two methods (1500 ms) whereas the inversion
pulse and inversion time were respectively 1380 ms and 100 ms. Identical zTE
acquisition was made for the two cases: FOV/Matrix 180mm/180; spokes per
segment 512; flip angle 3o; and bandwidth 31.25 kHz; total scan time 344
seconds.
The
MRA images were analyzed in the following two steps:
1.
Signal to noise ratio (SNR) of the hASL- and cASL- MRAs was estimated
respectively. Twenty-nine segments were assessed for each participant,
including bilateral internal carotid artery (cervical, petrous, foramen
lacerum, cavernous, clinoid process, ophthalmic and traffic segments),
bilateral anterior cerebral artery (A1 and A2 segments), bilateral middle
cerebral artery (M1 and M2 segments), bilateral posterior cerebral artery (P1
and P2 segments), and basilar artery. 2. The signals homogeneity of each
cerebral artery was scored using a 4-point scale (4=excellent, 3=good, 2=poor,
1=not visible) independently by two experienced neuroradiologists. Degree of
stenosis was scored on a 3-point scale (1,<50%
stenosis; 2, 50%-99% stenosis; and 3, occluded).
All
statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 19.0 software. The difference of
SNR values between each segment of cASL- and hASL- zTE-MRA were evaluated using
a paired-samples T test. The ratings of image quality were evaluated using
Wilcoxon-signed-rank tests respectively. P<0.05 was considered statistically
significant.Results
There were no evident vascular diseases
within 24 healthy volunteers. In addition, two patients with cerebrovascular
disorders were included: 1 stenosis case and 1 arteriovenous malformation (AVM)
case.
At
the segmental level, hASL-zTE-MRA performed well for all intracranial ICA
segments and the proximal branches of
arterial segments (vertebral artery, M1, A1, P1 segments). In
particular, hASL-zTE-MRA showed significantly superior SNR to cASL-zTE-MRA for
cervical ICA (10.15±1.50 vs 7.30±1.04; p<0.05) and petrous ICA segments
(10.77±1.44 vs 9.12±1.67; p<0.05). The SNR values for hASL-zTE-MRA were
also calculated for basilar artery, M2, A2, and P2 arterial segments. Comparable
values were revealed relative to those for cASL-zTE-MRA. Mean score of the
signals homogeneity for hASL-zTE-MRA (3.56±0.35) was superior scores for cASL-zTE-MRA
(3.27±0.44). There was less edge blur
effect in depiction of cerebral arteries especially all intracranial ICA
segments (Fig.1).
For
the patient with artery stenosis, hASL-zTE-MRA, compared to cASL-zTE-MRA, showed higher signal homogeneity (3.48±0.29
vs 3.30±0.41; p<0.05). While some lesions might be overestimated
on cASL-zTE-MRA, the artery stenosis has been clearly visualized in hASL-zTE-MRA
images, of which the quality was equal to that on CTA (Fig.2). 1 AVM patients
could be diagnosed, however, hASL-zTE-MRA showed more accurate details than cASL-zTE-MRA
(Fig.3).Discussion and conclusion
In this work, we evaluated the feasibility of hASL-zTE-MRA
in intracranial arteries by comparing with a conventional cASL-zTE-MRA. While
keeping the silent nature of zTE MRA, hASL vessel images didn’t show the
hollowing artifact and flow void effect which have been usually appeared in cASL.
Moreover, hASL images had higher SNR and less edge blur effect in depiction of proximal branches of intracranial arterial
segments. Additionally, hASL showed more robust performance in depicting
cerebrovascular diseases, which can improve the accuracy of clinical diagnosis.
In
conclusion, with these early but promising results, hASL-zTE-MRA has shown a potential to image patients with
cerebrovascular diseases in the clinic. To further validate this, studies with
a large clinical cohort are requested to be implemented in the near future.Acknowledgements
References
[1].
Bash
S, Villablanca JP, Jahan R, et al. Intracranial Vascular Stenosis and Occlusive
Disease: Evaluation with CT Angiography, MR Angiography, and Digital
Subtraction Angiography. Ajnr Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26 (5):1012-1021.
[2]. Shang S, Ye J, Dou W, et al. Validation of Zero TE–MRA in
the Characterization of Cerebrovascular Diseases: A Feasibility Study[J].
American Journal of Neuroradiology, 2019, 40(9): 1484-1490.
[3]. Qu
JX, Wu B, Zhou ZY. Silent Magnetic resonance angiography with hybrid arterial
spin labeling techniques. In: Proceedings of the 24th scientific meeting,
International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Singapore. 2016;p1426