Xiao Cui1, Xianshun Yuan1, Hui Gu1, Mo Wang2, Yin Dong1, Ximing Wang1, and Xiang Feng3
1Department of Radiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China, 2Department of Vascular Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, China, 3MR Scientific Marketing, Diagnosis Imaging, Siemens Healthcare Ltd, Beijing, China
Synopsis
This
study aimed to compare the diagnostic values between HR-MRI and CTA in young
adults with cervical artery dissections. Totally 42 patients with ischemic
stroke were recruited, including 20 carotid artery dissections, 12 vertebral
artery dissections and 10 non-dissected cervical arteries. Two radiologists
separately analyzed all the images. According to the radiologists’ scores for
the likelihood of the dissections, positive predictive value, negative
predictive value, sensitivity and specificity for both modalities were
calculated. We found the higher sensitivity and specificity of HR-MRI. This
study supports the value of HR-MRI in non-invasive diagnosis of young adults
due to cervical artery dissections.
Purpose
Stoke
remains the competing risk of demise and the leading cause of disability from
other causes for the patients, such as cancer and infectious diseases.1
The estimated global lifetime risk of stroke for the age between 18 years and
45 years is relatively high among the population. Cervical-artery dissection is
the major cause of ischemic stroke in young adults. The purpose of this study
is to compare the application and diagnosis performance of high-resolution
magnetic resonance (HR-MRI) with computed tomographic angiography
(CTA) on young patients with ischemic stroke due to cervical artery dissections.Material and Methods
Totally 42 symptomatic patients were involved in this retrospective study.
Among them, 38 patients underwent CTA, HR-MRI and Digital Subtraction
Angiography (DSA) for diagnosis, while the remaining 4
patients of vertebral artery dissections were
diagnosed by follow-up after 2-3 month therapy (anticoagulant
therapy and symptomatic treatment).
The
MRI examinations were performed on a 3T whole body scanner (MAGNETOM Verio,
Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) with a standard 16-channel head-neck
coil. The HR-MRI protocol contains a 3D time of flight (TOF) sequence with the
following parameters: repetition time (TR) = 20 ms, echo time (TE) = 3.27 ms,
field-of-view (FOV) = 230mm × 195mm, slice thickness = 1 mm, axial orientation,
covering from the carotid bifurcation to wills circle. The 2D T1-weighted
fat saturated (fs) dark blood (db) turbo spin echo (TSE) was scanned in transversal
plane with the parameters of TR = 1000ms, TE = 26ms, FOV = 140mm × 140mm, matrix
= 256 × 256, slice thickness = 2mm, 14 slices, covering the dissection part.
The 2D T2-weighted fs-db-TSE was applied with TR = 2500ms, TE = 60ms, FOV =
140mm × 140mm, matrix = 256 × 256, slice thickness = 2mm, 14 slices. Gd-DTPA
was used for contrast enhancement (CE) via vessel injection, with the bolus of
0.2 ml/kg (total bolus 10-15ml). The non-CE and CE 3D T1-weighted SPACE was
used in sagittal plane, with the sequence parameters of TR = 700ms, TE = 20ms,
FOV = 241mm × 241mm, matrix = 256 × 256, slice thickness = 0.9mm, 128 slices,
covering from carotid bifurcation to wills circle.
CTA examination was performed
on a 320-slice CT scanner (Aquillion ONE, Toshiba Medical Systems, Japan) with high-pitch
spiral scan mode.
CTA and HR-MRI images were separately and
blindly analyzed by two radiologists. The diagnosis performance of HR-MRI and
CTA was examined, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value
(PPV), negative predictive value (NPV). The receiver operating characteristic
(ROC) curves for the likelihood of diagnosis of the dissections were analyzed,
and their corresponding area under the curve (AUC) of each imaging modality was
calculated.Results
A
total of 20
carotid artery dissections, 12 vertebral artery dissections and 10
non-dissected cervical arteries were detected by both HR-MRI
and CTA. The inter-observer concordance of HR-MRI and CTA was moderate (κ = 0.806
vs. 0.776). The sensitivity and specificity of HR-MRI and CTA on
detecting the dissections are 87.5% vs. 62.5%, and 90.0% vs. 80.0%,
respectively. Area under the ROC curve of HR-MRI (0.94 [95% CI, 0.86–0.97]) was
greater than that of CTA (0.87 [95% CI, 0.71–1.0]).Discussion
Cervical artery dissections often manifested
as mural hematoma. The signal intensity of an acute hematoma within the first
48 hours is hypointense on T1WI and T2WI. Between
one week and two months, intramural hematoma will show hyper-intensity on
T1-weighted images. And subacute intramural hematomas have a characteristic
crescent shape with hyper-intensity around of the vessel lumen.2,3However,
if the intramural hematoma surrounding the lumen in subacute or chronic
cerebral infarction, it manifested as equidensity or low density on
CTA, which may cause missed diagnosis as luminal stenosis or occlusions and
misdiagnosis with atypical atherosclerosis, Takayasu Arteritis or other
diseases. Most patients in this study had sub-acute or chronic cerebral
infarction, which might explain the results of this study that the sensitivity
and specificity of HR-MRI is relatively higher.
In
some cases of this study, the signal intensity of the hematoma in HR-MRI was
complex and the form of the hematoma did not manifest as crescent shape around
of the vessel lumen. However, we could not find other typical signs. Thus, we
need to perform a further study and explore more signs to accurate diagnosis.Conclusions
Compared to CTA, HR-MRI is more sensitive
and specific for the diagnosis of cervical artery dissections in high-risk
symptomatic patients. This study supports the value of HR-MRI in non-invasive
diagnosis of young adults with cervical artery dissections.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Maigeng Zhou, Haidong Wang,
Xinying Zeng, et al. Mortality,
morbidity, and risk factors in China and its provinces, 1990–2017: a systematic
analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The
Lancet 2019; 394:1145-1158.
2. Debette
S, Leys D. Cervical-artery dissections: predisposing
factors, diagnosis, and outcome.
Lancet Neurol 2009; 8:668-678.
3. Flis CM, Jäger HR, Sidhu
PS. Carotid and vertebral artery dissections: clinical aspects, imaging
features and endovascular treatment. Eur Radiol 2007; 17:820-834.