Miran Han1, Woo Sang Jung1, and Jin Wook Choi1
1Radiology, Ajou University Medical Center, Suwon, Republic of Korea
Synopsis
We evaluate the feasibility of HR-VWI for diagnosing PICA dissection. Our
results demonstrated that HR-VWI could effectively diagnose arterial dissection
even in PICA, small diameter vessel. The dissection flap with outer wall
enlargement on T2W HR-VWI was most confident sign for diagnosing PICAD.
Isolated PICAD is not a rare cause of ischemic stroke in posterior circulation.
Therefore, in case of PICA territory infarction of uncertain origin, differentiating
PICAD using HR-VWI is necessary for proper treatment of patients, and T2WI
should be included in HR-VWI.
INTRODUCTION
The spontaneous isolated posterior inferior cerebellar artery dissection
(PICAD) has been known to be a rare disease entity, especially in case of dissection
presented as ischemic stroke.1-4
Recent progress in neuroimaging techniques, high resolution-vessel wall imaging
(HR-VWI), have improved diagnosis of arterial dissection, and dissections
presented as luminal stenosis and ischemic stroke have been found to be more
common than previous thought.5-7
Therefore, the purpose of this study was to clarify the radiologic features of
PICAD presented as ischemic stroke and to show the diagnostic feasibility of
HR-VWI for PICAD that has been underdiagnosed.METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed
consecutive 468 patients suspected of having arterial dissection involving posterior
cerebral circulation and underwent HR-VWI between March 2012 and July
2019. 309 patients were
diagnosed with arterial dissection involving posterior cerebral circulation and
44 patients among them (14.2%) finally diagnosed with isolated PICAD. The
confirmative diagnosis was decided by
consensus of 3 experts composed with neuroradiologist, neurointerventionist and
stroke neurologist after reviewing all clinical and paraclinical investigations
(initial CT, MR, DSA images and etiologic work up) available at hospital and
follow-up. At least one imaging or clinical follow up was performed within 3
months. The HR-VWI consist of 2D sequences(PD, T2, T1, CE-T1 with FOV of 10cm,
matrix size of 200x200, slice thickness of 2mm and black blood imaging using
saturation band), 3D contrast enhanced Motion-sensitized driven-equilibrium (CE-MSDE) T1 sequences with voxel
size of 1mm and TOF MRA with source images.
Two neuroradiologists independently reviewed HR-VWI and looked for direct
evidence of dissection (mural hematoma, dissection flap, outer
wall dilatation on T2WI of steno-occlusive segment on vascular image) on each
sequences of HR-VWI. The visualization of direct evidence was scaled as
0 = not demonstrated, 1 = demonstrated but not clearly visualized, and 2 =
clearly visualized. Diagnostic confidence was also scored as 5 point scale; 1 =
not suspicious to 5 = definite PICAD. Intra- and inter-observer agreement for
diagnosing PICAD and detecting dissection evidences were estimated with
weighted kappa coefficientRESULTS
Finally 43 patients (median age: 48years,
range: 33-65 years) were enrolled in this study. A patient was excluded,
because dissecting segment was not fully covered on HR-VWI. On CTA and MRA, PICAD were most often
presented as occlusion (41.9%), in contrast, stenosis and dilatation on DSA
(57.7%). Among dissection signs (Table on Fig. 1), dissecting flap were detected
on T2WI in all cases of PICAD, most of dissection flaps (83.7%) were also
clearly visualized. Outer wall enlargement were also detected in almost of
cases (97.7%). The mural hematomas were more frequently observed in CE-T1WI
(95.3%) and 3D CE-MSDE-T1WI (97.1%) than in T2WI (76.7%). Mean diagnostic
confidence scoring was 4.72. In 38 patients (88.4%), T2WI was the most useful
sequence for diagnosing PICAD, CE-T1WI was more useful than T2WI in only 5
patients (11.6%). The intra/inter-observer agreement (Table on Fig. 1) for
detecting dissection sign showed more than substantial agreement (0.62~0.94). In
diagnostic confidence scoring, almost perfect agreement was observed (intra-/inter-reader
agreement, 0.97/0.92)DISCUSSION
The
isolated PICAD were diagnosed in 14.2% of arterial dissection involving
posterior cerebral circulation in our study, this incidence is higher than that
(5.4~9.8%) in previous reports.1,8,9
The diagnosis rate of isolated PICAD presented as ischemic stroke is increasing
with the recent progress in vessel wall imaging.
Recent
reviews 10-12 about HR-VWI for
arterial dissection considered the CE 3D T1WI as the most optimal sequence and
mural hematoma as the most common finding. However, these studies targeted the
vertebrobasilar artery. In cases of PICA, which has smaller diameter than
vertebrobasilar artery, T2W HR-VWI seems more helpful for diagnosis of
dissection by viewing vessel dilatation. In our study, T2W HR-VWI clearly
showed the outer wall dilatation of PICA by the dissection in most of cases
(97.7%) and was more useful than CE T1WI, regardless of 2D or 3D. Furthermore, unlike
the intramural hematoma which shows active change of signal intensity according
to disease stage and is less sensitive in acute stage, dissection flap were clearly visualized in most of our cases
(83.7%) on T2W HR-VWI, irrespective of stage. Therefore, to diagnose the PICAD,
finding a dissection flap and outer wall dilatation on T2W HR-VWI may be more
useful than finding a mural hematoma on T1WI.
The 3D
HR-VWI has the advantages, image reformat of various planes and wide field of view.
However, our results showed that 2D HR-VWI achieved higher detection rate for
dissection evidences. This might be due to the lower spatial resolution of 3D
CE-MSDE, voxel size of 1.0 versus 0.5mm for 2D HR-VWI of our protocol. For
achieving higher spatial resolution of 3D MSDE-T1WI, 0.5mm voxel size as like
2D T1W HR-VWI, the acquisition time have to be longer, 2 or 3 times. Prolonged
acquisition times will inevitably lead to degradation of image quality from the
patient’s movement which frequently occurs in patients with dissection due to
severe headache, cerebral infarction or subarachnoid hemorrhageCONCLUSION
The HR-VWI could effectively diagnose arterial dissection even in PICA,
small diameter vessel. The dissection flap with outer wall enlargement on T2W
HR-VWI was most confident sign for diagnosing PICAD. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Matsumoto J., Ogata T., Abe H., et al. Do characteristics of
dissection differ between the posterior inferior cerebellar artery and the
vertebral artery? J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2014;23(10):2857-2861.
2. Sedat J., Chau Y., Mahagne M. H., et al. Dissection of the
posteroinferior cerebellar artery: clinical characteristics and long-term
follow-up in five cases. Cerebrovasc Dis 2007;24(2-3):183-190.
3. Tawk R. G., Bendok B. R., Qureshi A. I., et al. Isolated
dissections and dissecting aneurysms of the posterior inferior cerebellar
artery: topic and literature review. Neurosurg Rev 2003;26(3):180-187.
4. Park M. G., Choi J. H., Yang T. I., et al. Spontaneous isolated
posterior inferior cerebellar artery dissection: rare but underdiagnosed cause
of ischemic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2014;23(7):1865-1870.
5. Choi J. W., Han M., Hong J. M., et al. Feasibility of improved
motion-sensitized driven-equilibrium (iMSDE) prepared 3D T1-weighted imaging in
the diagnosis of vertebrobasilar artery dissection. J Neuroradiol
2018;45(3):186-191.
6. Park K. J., Jung S. C., Kim H. S., et al. Multi-Contrast
High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Findings of Spontaneous and Unruptured
Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissection: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis
According to Stages. Cerebrovasc Dis 2016;42(1-2):23-31.
7. Han M., Rim N. J., Lee J. S., et al. Feasibility of
high-resolution MR imaging for the diagnosis of intracranial vertebrobasilar
artery dissection. Eur Radiol 2014;24(12):3017-3024.
8. Kwon J. Y., Kim N. Y., Suh D. C., et al. Intracranial and
extracranial arterial dissection presenting with ischemic stroke: Lesion
location and stroke mechanism. J Neurol Sci 2015;358(1-2):371-376.
9. Chang F. C., Yong C. S., Huang H. C., et al. Posterior
Circulation Ischemic Stroke Caused by Arterial Dissection: Characteristics and
Predictors of Poor Outcomes. Cerebrovasc Dis 2015;40(3-4):144-150.
10. Tan H. W., Chen X., Maingard J., et al. Intracranial Vessel Wall
Imaging with Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Current Techniques and Applications.
World Neurosurg 2018;112:186-198.
11. Mandell D. M., Mossa-Basha M., Qiao Y., et al. Intracranial Vessel
Wall MRI: Principles and Expert Consensus Recommendations of the American
Society of Neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38(2):218-229.
12. Kontzialis Marinos, Wasserman Bruce A. Intracranial vessel wall
imaging: current applications and clinical implications. Neurovascular Imaging
2016;2(1):4.