Shuai Yuan1, Larry Davis1, Petrice Cogswell2, Spencer Waddle3, Lori Jordan1, and Manus Donahue4
1Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States, 2Mayo clinic, Rochester, MN, United States, 3Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States, 4Vanderbilt University Medical Center Department of Radiology, Nashville, TN, United States
Synopsis
Sickle cell disease leads to
increased risk of intracranial vasculopathy and stroke. Therefore, sensitive radiological
indicators of cerebrovascular disease severity are needed to aid in treatment
planning. 3T vessel wall imaging MRI studies demonstrated increased basilar artery wall thickness in sickle cell disease patients and inverse relationship between hematocrit and basilar wall thickness likely due to increased blood flow velocities and wall stress. Evaluation of internal carotid artery is difficult possibly
due to variable CSF signal suppression in these regions.
INTRODUCTION
Sickle
cell disease (SCD) is a monogenetic disorder with a high risk of intracranial
vasculopathy and stroke. While hematological measures of anemia and Doppler evaluation
of intracranial flow velocity provide coarse metrics of disease severity, only
10-20% of SCD patients have large vessel vasculopathy and as such sensitive radiological
indicators of cerebrovascular disease severity that may inform beyond what is
discernable on lumenography are needed to provide a more complete perspective
of disease severity and aid in treatment planning. We hypothesized that
intracranial vessel wall imaging (VWI) performed at the clinical field strength
of 3 Tesla (3T), which has already been applied for characterization of
intracranial plaque in older adults1 and patients
with atherosclerotic intracranial stenosis2,3, could
be applied to SCD patients, and specifically that reduced hematocrit and
associated elevated flow velocity lead to concentric vessel wall thickening. METHODS
SCD
patients (n=83; age (range)=19.4±8.2 (6-39) years; sex=36/47 Male/Female) and age-matched
controls (n=38; age (range)=22.2±8.9 (8-39) years; sex=19/19 Male/Female) were
consented and underwent a 3T brain MRI with standard anatomical imaging
(T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and diffusion weighted imaging), intracranial time-of-flight
angiography, and VWI (3D turbo-spin-echo; TR/TE=1500/33 ms; refocusing
sweep=40-120°;
0.5x0.5x1 mm). In a subgroup of volunteers (n=38), the VWI protocol was
repeated using a delay-alternating-nutation-with-tailored-excitation (DANTE)
module with DANTE4 flip angle=8° to
evaluate the impact of additional basal cistern CSF suppression on vessel wall
contrast-to-noise-ratio (Figure 1).
VWI images were reformatted in a plane orthogonal to the vessel course (Figure 2) using guidelines outlined in
the literature5 to measure mid basilar
artery and bilateral supraclinoid internal carotid arteries (ICA) lumen and
wall. Hematocrit was measured in SCD patients within 7 days of imaging. To test
the hypothesis that vessel wall thickness was higher in SCD patients versus
controls, vessel wall thickness measures were compared using a Student’s t-test.
To assess the relationships between vessel wall thickness and clinical
indicators of disease severity in SCD patients, first a Pearson’s correlation
was applied to evaluate the dependent of vessel wall thickness on hematocrit.
Next, regression analyses were performed using vessel wall thickness as the
dependent variable and age, sex, vasculopathy extent, and hematocrit as
explanatory variables. In all tests, significance criterion was two-sided
p<0.05. RESULTS
No
control participants had evidence of intracranial vasculopathy or infarcts,
whereas 12.0% of SCD patients had evidence of intracranial vasculopathy and
48.2% of SCD patients had overt or silent cerebral infarcts. Basilar wall
thickness was significantly higher (p<0.001) in SCD patients (1.08 +/- 0.17
mm) compared to age-matched controls (0.90 +/- 0.10 mm) and was inversely
related to hematocrit on Pearson’s correlation testing (r=-0.24; p=0.028) (Figures 3-4). On linear regression, an
inverse relationship was found between basilar wall thickness and hematocrit
(p=0.046) after controlling for age, sex, and vasculopathy. These finding were
not significant when considering ICA wall thickness, however trends for
significance were observed at the two-sided p-value of 0.10 – 0.20 when ICA
thickness was utilized as the vessel wall measurement of interest. DISCUSSION
This
study utilized an intracranial 3T VWI protocol with parameters within guideline
ranges2 in SCD patients
and age- and sex-matched control volunteers. Reduced hematocrit was found to inversely
correlate with basilar vessel wall thickness in SCD patients, consistent with
increased flow velocities and wall stress leading to concentric wall thickening.
ICA vessel walls did not meet criteria for significance, possibly due to more variable
CSF signal suppression in these regions as has been described6. When a
subset (n=38) of scans was repeated with additional CSF suppression from DANTE
preparation modules, measurements were not significantly different. However,
the vessel wall was deemed to be more difficult to interpret due to lower contrast-to-noise-ratio.
These findings are consistent with vessel wall damage persisting in the absence
of overt vasculopathy visible on MRA in patients with SCD, and suggest that
vessel wall damage as a result of reduced hematocrit and associated higher and
more turbulent flow profiles can manifest beyond simple luminal narrowing. This
may suggest that vascular regulation and oxygen extraction at the microvascular
level may be impaired due to vessel wall damage. CONCLUSION
Vessel
wall thickness, which can be measured using non-invasive 3T VWI MRI at the
spatial resolution of 0.5-1 mm, may provide an additional marker of
cerebrovascular impairment in SCD patients.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Harteveld A, van der Kolk A, van der Worp H, et al. High-resolution intracranial vessel wall MRI in an elderly asymptomatic population: comparison of 3T and 7T. Eur Radiol. 2016;27(4):1585-1595.
2. Mandell D, Mossa-Basha M, Qiao Y, et al. Intracranial Vessel Wall MRI: Principles and Expert Consensus Recommendations of the American Society of Neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016;38(2):218-229.
3. Qiao Y, Guallar E, Suri F, et al. MR Imaging Measures of Intracranial Atherosclerosis in a Population-based Study. Radiology. 2016;280(3):860-868.
4. Li L, Miller K, Jezzard P. DANTE-prepared pulse trains: A novel approach to motion-sensitized and motion-suppressed quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2012;68(5):1423-1438.
5. Cogswell P, Lants K, Davis L, et al. Vessel wall and lumen characteristics with age in healthy participants using 3T intracranial vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;50(5):1452-1460.
6. Cogswell P, Siero J, Lants K, et al. Variable impact of CSF flow suppression on quantitative 3.0T intracranial vessel wall measurements. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;48(4):1120-1128.