Wen-Tung Wang1, Dzung Pham1, and John A Butman1,2
1Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, NIH/USU, Bethesda, MD, United States, 2Radiology and Imaging Sciences, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States
Synopsis
First-order flow compensation has been widely used in MRI.
While it works for visualization of vessels and CSF, the residual flow effects
can impact the vessels visualization in some applications, such as minimum
intensity projection, which is often used in detecting cerebral
microhemorrhages on SWI images. When applying minIP, slight offset of spatial
registration, and residual flow dephasing from acceleration and pulsatility can
manifest as segments of hypointensities, compounding the difficulties in
microhemorrhage detection. By including flow sensitization gradients in SWI
sequence to suppress flow signal, dark vessels are delineated at correct
spatial locations.
INTRODUCTION
In magnetic resonance imaging, proton movement, such as
those in blood vessels or cerebrospinal fluid, during playout of magnetic field
gradients results in erroneous phase accumulations at echo time (TE). These accumulations
are dependent on proton velocity, acceleration, and pulsatility. Without proper
correction, they lead to incorrect frequency and phase encoding in k-space,
which in turn manifest as flow artifacts in image domain. Flow compensation1,2 employs additional gradients to null gradient moments so that the accumulated
phase of moving protons is correct at TE, and thus no flow artifacts in the resultant
image. For first-order gradient moment nulling (GMN), one additional gradient is
needed to compensate for the velocity of protons; for second-order GMN, two
gradients are needed to compensate for acceleration; and for third-order GMN,
three gradients are needed for pulsatility.
Adding gradients in a pulse sequence requires extending
minimum TR and possibly minimum TE. Therefore, in practice, only first-order
flow compensation is implemented and in general it works adequately that most
flow artifacts are suppressed and the bulk part of blood vessels are correctly spatially
encoded. Ideally, signal from blood in vessels would be of uniform intensity
and spatially registered. However,
incomplete flow compensation due to flow acceleration and pulsatility leads to incomplete
restoration of signal and somewhat inaccurate spatial encoding of tissue. This
is clearly seen on, for example, minimum intensity projection (minIP) whish is
often applied to detect cerebral microhemorrhages5 or vascular thrombus on SWI3,4 images. Because of the above, arteries in particular can appear irregular or
frankly inrerrupted into segments and thus misinterpreted as vascular stenoses
or as microhemorrhage. METHODS
To
enable flow sensitization, a pair of magnetic field gradients were added to readout,
phase-encoding, and slice-select directions of a gradient-recalled echo (GRE)
pulse sequence. The two gradients were the same but of opposite polarities to
prevent altering spatial encoding.
Healthy volunteers were scanned under
an IRB approved protocol (NCT00001711) using a vendor-provided
GRE and the custom GRE-FlowSens pulse sequences on a Siemens Biograph mMR 3T
MRI system (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). Contrast parameters were TR = 27 ms,
TE = 20 ms, and flip angle = 15°. Geometric parameters included image matrix of
256 × 256 × 40, and voxel size of 0.9 × 0.9 × 4 mm. A total of 3 sets of images
were obtained: GRE without and with flow compensation (GRE-FlowComp), and GRE-FlowSens.RESULTS
In Figure 1, magnitude, mIP, and minIP images from GRE,
GRE-FlowComp, and GRE-FlowSens were compared. While flow compensation spatially
registers the bulk part of blood vessels to correct locations, mis-registration
occurs when it was incomplete as indicated by the arrow. The blood vessel
structure was better delineated in GRE-FlowSens images. Residual flow dephasing
can manifest as hypointense segments in minIP, as shown in Figure 2. In certain
contexts such as traumatic brain injury, these segments can mimic cerebral
microhemorrhages.DISCUSSION
We developed a dark blood SWI sequence by adding flow
sensitization gradients in GRE sequence, which dephases blood signals and thus
better delineate blood vessels. It is shown that this sequence may be able to
reduce false positive of hypointense pathology, such as microhemorrhages. The
tradeoff of having flow sensitization gradients is that, while they dephase
signals of flowing protons, the additional gradients will make the sequence
more sensitive to patient motion. Further optimization is needed in this
regard.CONCLUSION
Dark blood SWI using a flow sensitization strategy results
in dark arteries which better conform to the anatomic structure of the
vaculature by minimizeing the artifacts resulting from incomplete flow
compensation. This strategy may improve
the utility of SWI for assessing the vasculature and minimize the generation of
artifactual microhemorrhage.Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Department of
Defense in the Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine and the
Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health.References
1 A. D. Elster, 'Motion
Artifact Suppression Technique (Mast) for Cranial Mr Imaging: Superiority over
Cardiac Gating for Reducing Phase-Shift Artifacts', AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 9 (1988), 671-4.
2 E.
M. Haacke, and G. W. Lenz, 'Improving Mr Image Quality in the Presence of
Motion by Using Rephasing Gradients', AJR
Am J Roentgenol, 148 (1987), 1251-8.
3 E.
M. Haacke, S. Mittal, Z. Wu, J. Neelavalli, and Y. C. Cheng,
'Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging: Technical Aspects and Clinical Applications,
Part 1', AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 30
(2009), 19-30.
4 E.
M. Haacke, Y. B. Xu, Y. C. N. Cheng, and J. R. Reichenbach, 'Susceptibility
Weighted Imaging (Swi)', Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine, 52 (2004), 612-18.
5 R.
N. K. Nandigam, A. Viswanathan, P. Delgado, M. E. Skehan, E. E. Smith, J.
Rosand, S. M. Greenberg, and B. C. Dickerson, 'Mr Imaging Detection of Cerebral
Microbleeds: Effect of Susceptibility-Weighted Imaging, Section Thickness, and
Field Strength', American Journal of
Neuroradiology, 30 (2009), 338-43.